Journals / Turkish journal of nephrology (Online) / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Peritonitis on Clinical Outcomes of PD Patients: A Single Center Experience

Pages
54–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Infectious complications may affect patient and technical survival.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate peritonitis episodes and causative agents in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), to examine the effects of peritonitis on technical and patient survival, and to determine whether the number of peritonitis episodes and causative agents was a risk factor or not.Materials and Methods: The medical records of 387 patients who started PD between January 2001 and January 2015were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients without peritonitis (Group 1 (n=123 patients)) and with detected peritonitis (Group2 (n=243 patients)) were divided into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Infectious complications may affect patient and technical survival.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate peritonitis episodes and causative agents in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), to examine the effects of peritonitis on technical and patient survival, and to determine whether the number of peritonitis episodes and causative agents was a risk factor or not.Materials and Methods: The medical records of 387 patients who started PD between January 2001 and January 2015were evaluated retrospectively. Patients without peritonitis (Group 1 (n=123 patients)) and with detected peritonitis (Group2 (n=243 patients)) were divided into two groups. Group 2 patients were subdivided according to the number of peritonitis(Group 2a 1 episode and Group 2b ≥2 episodes). Sociodemographic data and clinical courses were compared, and the reasons for PD withdrawal were obtained between the groups. Survival analysis was performed, and the effects of peritonitison mortality were investigated.Results: A total of 427 peritonitis episodes were detected. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (36%).The leading cause of death was cardiovascular disease in Group 1, whereas it was infection in Group 2a and Group 2b.Technique survival and mortality rates were similar among the groups. Risk factors for patient survival were history of peritonitis more than once and history of catheter exit site/tunnel infection. History of catheter exit site/tunnel infection wasthe only risk factor for technique survival.Conclusion: Our study has shown that even though the causes for mortality were different, mortality rates, and techniquesurvival were similar between the two main groups. Infectious complications may affect patient and technical survival.

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAR, Z. A., KOÇ, Y., BAŞTÜRK, T., ÇAĞLAYAN, F. B., SAKACI, T., AHBAP, E., SİNANGİL, A., SEVİNÇ, M., KAYALAR, A., HASBAL, N. B., ÜNSAL, A. (2019). The Impact of Peritonitis on Clinical Outcomes of PD Patients: A Single Center Experience. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 54–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/374907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kotsanas D, Polkinghorne KR, Korman TM, Atkins RC, Brown F. Risk factors for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: can we reduce the incidence and improve patient selec-tion? Nephrology (Carlton) 2007
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Daly CD, Campbell MK, MacLeod AM, Cody DJ, Vale LD, Grant AM, et al. Do the Y-set and double-bag systems reduce the incidence of CAPD peritonitis? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, de Arteaga J, Fan S, Figueiredo AE, et al. ISPD Peritonitis recomendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 2016, 36: 481-508. [CrossRef] 4. Woodrow G, Turney JH, Brownjohn AM. Technique failure in peritoneal dialysis and its im-pact on patient survival. Perit Dial Int 1997
  4. Rojas-Campos E, Alcántar-Medina M, Cortés-Sanabria L, MartínezRamírez HR, Camarena JL, Chávez S, et al. Patient and technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a single center of the west of Mexico. Rev Invest Clin 2007
  5. Hsieh YP, Chang CC, Wen YK, Chiu PF, Yang Y. Predictors of peritonitis and the impact of peritonitis on clinical outcomes of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients in Tai-wan-10 years’ experience in a single center. Perit Dial Int 2014
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Hsieh YP, Chang CC, Wang SC, Wen YK, Chiu PF, Yang Y. Predictors for and impact of high peritonitis rate in Taiwanese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2015
  7. [CrossRef] 8. Brown MC, Simpson K, Kerssens JJ, Mactier RA, Scottish Renal Registry. Peritoneal dialysis associated peritonitis rates and outcomes in a national cohort are not improving in the post-millennium (2000-2007). Perit Dial Int 2011
  8. [CrossRef] 9. Ghali JR, Bannister KM, Brown FG, Rosman JB, Wiggins KJ, Johnson DW, et al. Mi-crobiology and outcomes of peritonitis in Australian peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2011
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Davenport A. Peritonitis remains the major clinical complication of peritoneal dialysis: the London, UK, peritonitis audit 2002-2003. Perit Dial Int 2009
  10. Szeto CC, Wong TY, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK. Are peritoneal dialysispatients with and without residual renal function equivalent for survival study? Insight from a retrospective review of the cause of death. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Boudville N, Kem