AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightConducting effective intervention is of critical importance.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Objective: Turkey has nearly 2.5 million Syrian refugees, and it provides them healthcare, education, shelter, and food aid.This study aimed to determine some of the socio-demographic features, income status, shelter, and living conditions inSyrian and socially underprivileged Turkish patients receiving hemodialysis. This study also makes comparisons betweenthe two groups.Materials and Methods: We included 23 Syrian and 82 socially underprivileged Turkish patients receiving hemodialysis inthis study. The questionnaires included queries on socio-demographic, income distribution, and living conditions.Results: Syrian patients were younger (34.08±12.30 vs. 55.13±17.96 years; p=0.001) and better educated (p=0.009). Compliance with hemodialysis sessions was lower in refugees (p=0.002). Per capita income was lower among Syrian patients,although there were more employed persons in Syrian families (1.86±1.09 vs. 1.04±0.92; p=0.003). The mean number ofhousehold members was 7.4±3 and 4.5±2 in families of Syrian and Turkish patients, respectively (p=0.001). Most Syrianpatients were living as tenants (p=0.002) without access to hot water (p=0.043). Having home appliances such as washingmachines, dishwashers, and refrigerators was more common among Turkish patients (p=0.013; p<0.001; p=0.001). Syrianpatients could not afford to repair old and worn furniture and could not pay their bills (p=0.011; p=0.001).Conclusion: Socio-economic status of Syrian patients receiving hemodialysis is worse as compared to that of underprivileged Turkish patients receiving hemodialysis. Conducting effective intervention is of critical importance.