Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Is It Possible to Protract the Maxilla by Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Intermaxillary Class III Elastics?

Pages
96–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Superior lower labial area (Area 3; p<0.05) decreased as a result ofslight increase in facial height and changes in maxillary–mandibular incisor relationship at the end of the treatment.Conclusion: The results suggest that the improvement in the facial profiles of the patients is related to the significant increase in thebony and dental support of the upper lip region together with the contribution of the superior lower lip area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate skeletal and soft tissue changes with surgically assisted rapid maxillaryexpansion (SARME) and intermaxillary Class III elastics.Methods: A total of 15 patients (mean age: 19.58 years) were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Each patient underwent SARME with the use ofClass III elastics (500 g) applied through miniscrews to stimulate maxillary advancement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Superior lower labial area (Area 3; p<0.05) decreased as a result ofslight increase in facial height and changes in maxillary–mandibular incisor relationship at the end of the treatment.Conclusion: The results suggest that the improvement in the facial profiles of the patients is related to the significant increase in thebony and dental support of the upper lip region together with the contribution of the superior lower lip area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate skeletal and soft tissue changes with surgically assisted rapid maxillaryexpansion (SARME) and intermaxillary Class III elastics.Methods: A total of 15 patients (mean age: 19.58 years) were included in the study. Each patient underwent SARME with the use ofClass III elastics (500 g) applied through miniscrews to stimulate maxillary advancement. Lateral cephalograms and posteroanteriorradiographs obtained before treatment (T1), after SARME and elastic use (T2), and after treatment (T3) were analyzed to determinethe changes in each phase of treatment. Planimeter was used to evaluate facial soft tissue changes. Wilcoxon signed-rank test wasused to evaluate the changes that occur during treatment.Results: SARME provided permanent and efficient maxillary expansion at both skeletal and dental levels (p<0.01). Maxillary skeletal(ANS-Ver and U1i-Ver; p<0.01) and soft tissue (Pr-Ver, Sn-Ver, and ULA-Ver; p<0.01) variables and superior upper labial area (Area 1;p<0.05) increased due to maxillary dental and skeletal changes. Superior lower labial area (Area 3; p<0.05) decreased as a result ofslight increase in facial height and changes in maxillary–mandibular incisor relationship at the end of the treatment.Conclusion: The results suggest that the improvement in the facial profiles of the patients is related to the significant increase in thebony and dental support of the upper lip region together with the contribution of the superior lower lip area.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHBAZ, E. B., CESUR, E., ALTUĞ, A. T., ERGÜL, K. C., KARASU, H. A., MEMİKOĞLU, U. T. (2019). Is It Possible to Protract the Maxilla by Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Intermaxillary Class III Elastics?. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 96–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/374732

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Zimring JF, Isaacson RJ. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. III. Forces present during retention. Angle Orthod 1965; 35: 178-86
  2. Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 41-66. [CrossRef] 3. Timms DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 500-7. [CrossRef] 4. Suri L, Taneja P. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 133: 290-302. [CrossRef] 5. Bell WH, Epker BN. Surgical-orthodontic expansion of the maxilla. Am J Orthod 1976; 70: 517-28. [CrossRef] 6. Furquim LZ, Janson G, Furquim BD, Filho LI, Henriques JFC, Ferreira GM. Maxillary protraction after surgically assisted maxillary expansion. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 308-15. [CrossRef] 7. Parello D, Bolamperti L, Caprioglio A. Interdisciplinary treatment of Class III malocclusion: a case report. Prog Orthod 2011; 12: 169-79. [CrossRef] 8. Marchetti C, Pironi M, Bianchi A, Musci A. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion vs. segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: Transverse stability over a 2-year period. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009; 37: 74-8. [CrossRef] 9. Janson M, Janson G, Sant'ana Eduardo, Nakamura A, de Freitas MR. Segmental Lefort I osteotomy for treatment of a class III malocclusion with temporomandibular disorder. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 302-9. [CrossRef] 10. Haas Junior OL, Guijarro-Martínez R, de Sousa Gil AP, da Silva Meirelles L, de Oliveira RB, Hernández-Alfaro F. Stability and surgical complications in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46: 1071-87.[CrossRef] 11. Yilmaz HN, Garip H, Satilmis T, Kucukkeles N. Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 48-57. [CrossRef] 12. Nevzatoğlu Ş, Küçükkeleş N. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 1002-9. [CrossRef] 13. Küçükkeleş N, Nevzatoğlu Ş, Koldaş T. Rapid maxillary expansion compared to surgery for assistance in maxillary face mask protraction. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 42-9. [CrossRef] 14. Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Ludwig B, Kau CH, Drescher D. Early Class III treatment with a Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 15-21
  3. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: A new perspective for t