Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Reliability of Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models of Patients with a Cleft Lip and Palate

Pages
65–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it may be recommended to use 3Ddigital images of infants with CLP for nasolabial measurements especially if performed in postgraduate settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the more and less reliable measurements/methods and (2) the influenceof knowledge and skill on the inter- examiner, intra-examiner, and inter-method reliability of nasolabial measurements on plastercasts and three dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetric images of casts in infants with an unrepaired unilateral cleft lip and palate(UUCLP).Methods: Preoperative extraoral plaster casts from 42 patients with UUCLP were measured with a digital caliper, and the imageacquisition of casts was performed with the 3dMDface stereophotogrammetry system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two examiners (one postgraduate student, one lecturer) evaluated 19 nasolabial measurements in two separate sessions.Results: Intra-rater, inter-rater, and inter-method reliability was lower in measurements of nasal, philtral, and nasal floor width.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it may be recommended to use 3Ddigital images of infants with CLP for nasolabial measurements especially if performed in postgraduate settings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the more and less reliable measurements/methods and (2) the influenceof knowledge and skill on the inter- examiner, intra-examiner, and inter-method reliability of nasolabial measurements on plastercasts and three dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetric images of casts in infants with an unrepaired unilateral cleft lip and palate(UUCLP).Methods: Preoperative extraoral plaster casts from 42 patients with UUCLP were measured with a digital caliper, and the imageacquisition of casts was performed with the 3dMDface stereophotogrammetry system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA). Two examiners (one postgraduate student, one lecturer) evaluated 19 nasolabial measurements in two separate sessions.Results: Intra-rater, inter-rater, and inter-method reliability was lower in measurements of nasal, philtral, and nasal floor width. Almostall of the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for measurements performed by the lecturer were above 0.75, whereas the intra-examiner reliability of some measurements performed by the postgraduate student showed low ICC (<0.75).Conclusion: Measurements of curving slopes, such as nasal width, of small dimensions, such as nostril floor width, and deformity-affected anatomic parts, such as philtrum width, presented a low reliability. Measurements on 3D images showed a higher reliabilitycompared to plaster model measurements performed by the postgraduate student. Therefore, it may be recommended to use 3Ddigital images of infants with CLP for nasolabial measurements especially if performed in postgraduate settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, R. B. N., ÇAKAN, D. G., ALTAY, M., CANTER, H. İ. (2019). Reliability of Measurements on Plaster and Digital Models of Patients with a Cleft Lip and Palate. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 65–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/374676

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nur RB, Ilhan D, Fişekçioğlu E, Oktay İ, Arun T. Prevalence of orthodontic malocclusion and evaluation criteria in 7 geographic regions of Turkey. Turk J Orthod 2014
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Tomatr AG, Demirhan H, Sorkun HC, Köksal A, Ozerdem F, Cilengir N. Major congenital anomalies: a five-year retrospective regional study in Turkey. Genet Mol Res 2009
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Rosenstein SW. A new concept in the early orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod 1969
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Vegter F, Hage JJ. Standardized facial photography of cleft patients: just fit the grid? Cleft Palate Craniofac 2000
  5. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ. Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993
  7. Bacher M, Göz G, Pham T, Bacher U, Werner O, Buchner P, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of cleft palate topology in newborn infants with reference to the cranial skeleton. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998
  8. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Schmitz JH, Colombo A. Quantitative description of the morphology of the human palate by a mathematical equation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Holdberg C, Schwenzer K, Mahaini L, Rudzki-Janson I. Accurancy of facial plaster casts. Angle Orthod 2006
  10. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 2010
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Castalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Dirksen D, Diederichs S, Runte C, von Bally G, Bollmann F. Three-dimensional acqusition and visiualisation of dental arch features from optically digitized models. J Orofac Orthop 1999
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Jin J, Niblett TB, Urguhart C, et al. A three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study casts: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997
  14. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a t