SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trakya Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi B Serisi Fen Bilimleri / 2001 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Ağaç farelerinde (Gliridae, Rodentia) orta kulağın morfolojik biçimleri ve evrimsel yolları

Morphological patterns and evolutionary pathways of the middle ear in dormice (Gliridae, Rodentia)

Elena G. POTAPOVA
Pages
159–170
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Close affinity of Selevinia to Myomimus, and of Dryomys to Eliomys are also argued.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The morphology of the middle ear was examined in all recent glirid genera except Chaetacauda.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The evolutionary transformation of auditory bulla in this group is interconnected with pneumatization of its tympanic and mastoid regions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Close affinity of Selevinia to Myomimus, and of Dryomys to Eliomys are also argued.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:morfoloji · filogeni · Gliridae

Abstract

The morphology of the middle ear was examined in all recent glirid genera except Chaetacauda. The evolutionary transformation of auditory bulla in this group is interconnected with pneumatization of its tympanic and mastoid regions. Several pathways of the middle ear specialization in glirids was recognized. The scheme of interrelations between different groups within family Gliridae showing morphological diversity of the dormice middle ear morphology is presented. Glirulus stands far apart from Glis. The Muscardinus also represents independent line that seems to be more closely related to the Dryomys-Eliomys phylum than to Glis. Among graphiurins, independent position can be asserted to each of G.(Aethglis) hueti and G.(Claviglis) crassicaudutus. Close affinity of Selevinia to Myomimus, and of Dryomys to Eliomys are also argued.

Özet

Chaetocauda cinsi dışında güncel glirid cinslerinin orta kulak morfolojileri incelenmiştir. Bu grupta işitme kemiğinin evrimsel dönüşümü timpanik ve mastoid bölgenin pneumatizasyona bağlıdır. Gliridlerde orta kulak özelleşmesine ait bir kaç evrimsel yol tanımlanmıştır. Orta kulak morfolojileri bakımından morfolojik farklılık gösteren Gliridae familyası içindeki farklı gruplar arasındaki ilişkilerin şeması sunulmuştur. Glirulus cinsi Glis cinsinden çok uzakta bulunur. Aynı şekilde bağımsız bir yol izleyen Muscardinus cinsi de Dryomys-Eliomys filumuna Glis'den çok daha yakın görünmektedir. Graphiurinler içinde, hem G (Aethglis) hueti hem de G. (Claviglis) crasssicaudutus taksonlarının bağımsız bir pozisyonlan olduğu söylenebilir. Selevinia cinsinin Myominus cinsine Dryomys cinsinin de Eliomys cinsine çok yakın akrabalıkları da tartışılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POTAPOVA, E. G. (2001). Ağaç farelerinde (Gliridae, Rodentia) orta kulağın morfolojik biçimleri ve evrimsel yolları. Trakya Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi B Serisi Fen Bilimleri, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 159–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/373729

References (20)

  1. Lay, D.M. Journ. Morphol. V. 138, N 1: 41-120. 1972
  2. Webster D.B., Webster M. Journ. Morphol. V. 146, N 2: 343-376. 1975
  3. Pavlinov, I.Ja. Bull. MOIP, ser. biol. V. 85, N 4: 20-33. 1980 (in Russian)
  4. Pavlinov, I.Ja. Zool. Jour. V. 67, N 5: 739-750. 1988 (in Russian)
  5. Pavlinov, I.Ja., Dubrovsky, Yu.A., Rossolimo, O.L., Potapova, E.G. Gerbils of the World.: 1-368. Moscow: Nauka. 1990 (in Russian)
  6. Shenbrot, G.I. In: Phylogenetics of mammals. O.L.Rossolimo (ed.). Archives of Zool. Mus. Moscow State Univ. V. 29: 176-200. Moscow Univ. Press. 1992 (in Russian)
  7. Potapova, E.G. In: State of theriofauna of Russia and adjacent countries. Proc. Internat. meeting. 1-3 February, 1995. Moscow. V.E.Sokolov (ed.).: 280-285. Moscow. 1996 (in Russian)
  8. Potapova, E.G. Zool. Jour. V. 77, N 1: 80-87. 1998 (in Russian)
  9. Alexander, R. Biomecanics.: 1-339. Moscow: Mir. 1970 (in Russian)
  10. Moore, W.J. The mammalian skull.: 1-369. Lnd, New York: Cambridge Univ. press. 1981
  11. Wahlert J.H., Sawitzke Sh.L., Holden M.E. Amer. Mus. Novitates. N 3061: 1-32. 1993
  12. Webster D.B. Journ. Morphol. V. 146, N 2: 377-394. 1975
  13. Parent, J.-P. Recherche sur l’oreille moyenne des Rongeurs actuels et fossiles. In: Mém. Trav. Inst. Montpellier, école Prat. Haut. étud. 11: 286 pp. 1980
  14. Lavocat, R., and Parent, J.-P. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents, a multidisciplinary analysis. W.P.Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger (eds.). 333-354. New York, Lnd.: Plenum Press. 1985
  15. Chaline, J., and Mein, P. Les Rongeurs et l’évolution. Paris: Doin Ed. 1-235. 1979
  16. Bugge, J. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents, a multidisciplinary analysis. W.P.Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger (eds.). 355-379. New York, Lnd.: Plenum Press. 1985
  17. Wahlert J.H. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents, a multidisciplinary analysis. W.P.Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger (eds.). 685-712. New York, Lnd.: Plenum Press. 1985
  18. Meng, J. Amer. Mus. Novitates. N 2972: 1-35. 1990
  19. Wood, C. Encyclop. Britan. V. 15: 969-980. 1974. 20.Vianey-Liaud M. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents, a multidisciplinary analysis. W.P.Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger (eds.). 685-712. New York, Lnd.: Plenum Press. 1985
  20. Yachontov E.L., Potapova E.G. In: Problem of systematics, fauna and paleontology of the small mammals. (Proc. of Zool. Inst. of Academy USSR. V. 243). 127-147. S. Peterburg. 1991.