Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

AUTOMATIC GROUND EXTRACTION FOR URBAN AREAS FROM AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA

Pages
113–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The quality control basically performed qualitatively by visual inspection and quantitatively by calculation of overall accuracy, which is conduct by comparing the proposed algorithm results with data provider’s ground classification and Cloth Simulation Filtering (CSF) algorithm’s results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Terrain models play a key role in many applications, such as hydrological modeling, volume calculation, wire and pipeline route planning as well as many engineering applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While terrain models can be generated from traditional data sources, an advanced and recently popular geospatial technology, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data, is also a source for generating high-density terrain models in the last decades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The quality control basically performed qualitatively by visual inspection and quantitatively by calculation of overall accuracy, which is conduct by comparing the proposed algorithm results with data provider’s ground classification and Cloth Simulation Filtering (CSF) algorithm’s results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ground Extraction · LiDAR · Ground Modeling

Abstract

Terrain models play a key role in many applications, such as hydrological modeling, volume calculation, wire and pipeline route planning as well as many engineering applications. While terrain models can be generated from traditional data sources, an advanced and recently popular geospatial technology, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data, is also a source for generating high-density terrain models in the last decades. The main advantage of LiDAR technology over traditional data sources is that it generates 3D point clouds directly so that the representation of the surfaces is obtained fast. On the other hand, before terrain modeling, ground points need to be extracted by point labeling in the 3D point cloud. In this study, a new algorithm is proposed for automatic ground point extraction from airborne LiDAR data for urban areas. The proposed algorithm is mainly based on height information of the points in the dataset and labels ground points comparing height differences in local windows. The algorithm does not require any user input threshold and a neighborhood definition. The proposed ground extraction algorithm was tested with three different urban area LiDAR data. The quality control basically performed qualitatively by visual inspection and quantitatively by calculation of overall accuracy, which is conduct by comparing the proposed algorithm results with data provider’s ground classification and Cloth Simulation Filtering (CSF) algorithm’s results. The overall accuracy of the proposed algorithm is found between 95%-98%. The experimental results showed that the algorithm promises reliable results to extract ground points from airborne LiDAR data for urban areas.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVGEN, S. C., KARSLI, F. (2020). AUTOMATIC GROUND EXTRACTION FOR URBAN AREAS FROM AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 113–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/370936

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akçay, Ö, Erenoğlu, R, Avşar, E (2017). The Effect Of Jpeg Compression In Close Range Photogrammetry. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2 (1), 35-40 DOI: 10.26833/Ijeg.287308 Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 33 (B4/1): 110–117.
  2. Büyüksalih İ., Gazioglu C (2019). New Approach in Integrated Basin Modelling: Melen Airborne LIDAR. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO) 6: 22-32. 10.30897/ijegeo.530272. Canaz S, Habib A (2013) Photogrammetric features for the registration of terrestrial laser scans with minimum overlap. J. Geod. Geoinf. 2013, 2, 1–8.
  3. Canaz Sevgen, S. (2019). Airborne Lidar Data Classification In Complex Urban Area Using Random Forest: A Case Study of Bergama, Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4 (1), 45-51.doi: 10.26833/ijeg.440828 Chen Z, Gao B, Devereux B (2017) State-of-the-art:DTM generation using airborne LIDAR data. Sensors 2017, 17, 150. Chen Q, Gong P, Baldocchi D, Xin G (2007). Filtering airborne laser scanning data with morphological methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73(2), 175-185.
  4. Filin S, Pfeifer N (2006) Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using a slope adaptive neighborhood. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 60, 71–80.
  5. Kilian J, Haala N, Englich M (1996) Capture and evaluation of airborne laser scanner data, International Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 31(B3), 383-388.
  6. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (2001) Advanced DTM generation from LIDAR data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIV (Pt. 3/W4) (2001), pp. 23-30.
  7. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (1998) Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 53(4), 193-203.
  8. LAStools (2017) Award-winning software for efficient LiDAR processing with LASzip, obtained from https://rapidlasso.com/LAStools/
  9. Lee HS, Younan NH (2003) DTM extraction of LiDAR returns via adaptive processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41(9), 2063-2069.
  10. Liu X, Zhang Z (2008) Lidar data reduction for efficient and high quality DEM generation. Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inform. Sci. vol. 37 (pg. 173 -178 ). Liu X (2008) Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Prog.