Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS IN PNEUMONIA DIAGNOSIS USING CHEST X-RAY IMAGES

Pages
129–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the best results of this study, this model was able to accurately predict the class of 93.4% of the test data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the analysis of medical images using deep learning techniques has become an area of increasing popularity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Advances in this area have been particularly evident after the discovery of deep artificial neural network models and achieving more successful performance results than other traditional models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the best results of this study, this model was able to accurately predict the class of 93.4% of the test data.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deep Learning · Medical Diagnosis · Data Augmentation

Abstract

In recent years, the analysis of medical images using deep learning techniques has become an area of increasing popularity. Advances in this area have been particularly evident after the discovery of deep artificial neural network models and achieving more successful performance results than other traditional models. In this study, the performance comparison of different deep learning models used to efficiently diagnose pneumonia on chest x-ray images was performed. The data set used in the study consists of a total of 5840 chest x-ray images of individuals. In order to classify these data, three different deep learning models are used: Convolutional Neural Network, Convolutional Neural Network with Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning. The images in the data set were classified into two categories as pneumonia and healthy people using these three deep learning models. The performances of these three deep learning models used in classification were compared in terms of loss and accuracy. In the comparison of three different deep learning models with two different performance values, 5216 chest x-ray images in the data set were used to train the deep learning model and the remaining 624 were used to test the model. At the end of the study, the most successful performance result was obtained by convolutional neural network model applied with data augmentation technique. According to the best results of this study, this model was able to accurately predict the class of 93.4% of the test data.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLGÜN, O. D., EROL, H. (2020). CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS IN PNEUMONIA DIAGNOSIS USING CHEST X-RAY IMAGES. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 129–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/370874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aghdam, H. H. and Heravi, E. J. (2017). Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks, NY: Springer, New York, USA Chest X-Ray Images, https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/chestxray-pneumonia [Accessed 20 July 2019]. Convolution Operation, https://medium.com/@bdhuma/6-basic-things-to-knowabout-convolution-daef5e1bc411 [Accessed 21 July 2019]. Data Augmentation, https://developers.google.com/machinelearning/practica/image-classification/preventingoverfitting [Accessed 26 July 2019]. Dropout, https://medium.com/@amarbudhiraja/httpsmedium-com-amarbudhiraja-learning-less-to-learnbetter-dropout-in-deep-machine-learning-74334da4bfc5 [Accessed 26 July 2019]. Features, https://medium.com/abraia/getting-startedwith-image-recognition-and-convolutional-neuralnetworks-in-5-minutes-28c1dfdd401 [Accessed 29 July 2019]. First Model, http://fourier.eng.hmc.edu/e176/lectures/ch10/node8.html [Accessed 27 July 2019]. Flattening, https://www.kaggle.com/kanncaa1/convolutional-neuralnetwork-cnn-tutorial/notebook [Accessed 25 July 2019]. Fully Connected Layer, http://cs231n.github.io/convolutional-networks/ [Accessed 22 July 2019].
  2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016).
  3. Deep learning, MIT press, Massachusetts, USA. Image Pixels, https://ai.stanford.edu/~syyeung/cvweb/tutorial1.html [Accessed 20 July 2019].
  4. Indraswari, R., Kurita, T., Arifin, A. Z., Suciati, N. and Astuti, E. R. (2019). “Multi-projection deep learning network for segmentation of 3D medical images.” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 125, pp. 791-797.
  5. Kermany, D. K., & Goldbaum, M. (2018). Labeled optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Chest X-Ray images for classification. Mendeley Data, 2. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G. E. (2012). “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” Neural Information Processing Systems 2012,
  6. NIPS, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, USA, pp. 1097-1105.
  7. Li, Y., Zhang, H., Bermudez, C., Chen, Y., Landman, B. A. and Vorobeychik, Y. (2019). “Anatomical context protects deep learning from adversarial perturbations in medical imaging.” Neurocomputing. Lundervold, A. S. and Lundervold, A. (2019). “An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI.” Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 102-127. Max Pooling, http://adventuresinmachinelearning.com/convolutionalneural-networks-tutorial-tensorflow/[Accessed 22 July 2019]. Relu Activation Function, https://www.kaggle.com/kanncaa1/convolutional-neuralnetwork-cnn-tutorial/notebook [Acce