Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2019 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 5

Clinical Analysis of Propofol, Etomidate and an Admixture of Etomidate and Propofol for Induction of General Anaesthesia

Pages
382–386
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although we found no statistically significant difference between the threegroups when assessing postoperative nausea and vomiting, these symptoms were more prevalent in groups E and PE than in group P.Conclusion: Using an admixture of etomidate and propofol as the induction agent reduced the incidence of side effects observed with use ofeither drug alone such as pain upon injection, myoclonus and haemodynamic instability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE).Methods: In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18–60 years of age who were undergoing elective surgerywith general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either propofol 2.5 mg kg−1 IV (group P; n=30), etomidate 0.3 mg kg−1 IV (group E;n=30) or an admixture of etomidate 0.2 mg kg−1 IV and propofol 1 mg kg−1 IV (group PE; n=30) as the induction agent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The haemodynamic response was first recorded at baseline, then at 1 minute following administration the study drug, and 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40minutes following intubation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although we found no statistically significant difference between the threegroups when assessing postoperative nausea and vomiting, these symptoms were more prevalent in groups E and PE than in group P.Conclusion: Using an admixture of etomidate and propofol as the induction agent reduced the incidence of side effects observed with use ofeither drug alone such as pain upon injection, myoclonus and haemodynamic instability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the clinical outcome following induction of general anaesthesia with intravenous (IV) injection of propofol (P), etomidate (E) or a 50% admixture of propofol and etomidate (PE).Methods: In this prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled study, patients 18–60 years of age who were undergoing elective surgerywith general anaesthesia were randomised to receive either propofol 2.5 mg kg−1 IV (group P; n=30), etomidate 0.3 mg kg−1 IV (group E;n=30) or an admixture of etomidate 0.2 mg kg−1 IV and propofol 1 mg kg−1 IV (group PE; n=30) as the induction agent. The haemodynamic response was first recorded at baseline, then at 1 minute following administration the study drug, and 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40minutes following intubation. Perioperative symptoms such as myoclonus, pain upon injection and/or vomiting upon induction as well aspostoperative nausea were recorded.Results: We observed a decrease in systemic haemodynamics from baseline following induction in group P compared to groups E and PE(p<0.05). Incidence of myoclonus was reduced from 76.6% in group E to 6.6% in group PE (p<0.001). There was also a reduction in reportedpain upon injection in group PE compared to group P (p<0.001). Although we found no statistically significant difference between the threegroups when assessing postoperative nausea and vomiting, these symptoms were more prevalent in groups E and PE than in group P.Conclusion: Using an admixture of etomidate and propofol as the induction agent reduced the incidence of side effects observed with use ofeither drug alone such as pain upon injection, myoclonus and haemodynamic instability.

🔖

Cite This Article

RATHORE, V. S., SİNGH, S., TAANK, P., KHANDELWAL, A., KAUSHAL, A. (2019). Clinical Analysis of Propofol, Etomidate and an Admixture of Etomidate and Propofol for Induction of General Anaesthesia. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 5, 382–386. https://ajindex.com/articles/370626

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Stoelting Robert and Simon C.Hiller. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic practice. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins publishers, 2006; 159-60
  2. Larsen R, Rathgeber J, Bagdahn A, Lange H, Riekel H. Effects of Propofol on cardiovascular dynamics and coronary blood flow in geriatric patients, a comparison with Etomidate. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 25-31. [CrossRef] 3. Prerna B, Shalendra S, Priya T. Application of ‘Priming Principle’ on the induction dose requirements of propofol - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Biomed Res 2018; 9: 320-4
  3. Reves JG, Glass P, Lubarsky DA. In: Miller RD, editors. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th Ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2005.pp.719-69
  4. Fatma S, Sennur U, Oguzhan A, Funda A, Ulku A. A clinical comparison of Etomidate-lipuro, Propofol and admixture at induction. Saudi J Anaesth 2011; 5: 62-6. [CrossRef] 6. Ghafoor H, Afshan G, Kamel R. General anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway: Etomidate vs. Propofol for hemodynamic stability. Open J Anesthesiol 2012; 2: 161-5. [CrossRef] 7. Hosseinzadeh H, Golzari SE, Torabi E, Dehdilani M. Hemodynamic Changes following Anesthesia Induction and LMA Insertion with Propofol, Etomidate, and Propofol + Etomidate. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2013; 5: 109-12
  5. Shivaprakash S, Shio P, Sathyanarayan J. A comparative study of hemodynamic effects of Propofol and Etomidate as an induction agent in coronary artery surgery. JEMDS 2015; 4: 598- 607. [CrossRef] 9. Supriya A, Vipin KG, Shashi KC, Vijay M. A comparative study between propofol and etomidate patients under general anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2016; 66: 237-24. [CrossRef] 10. Kumar Y. Comparison of propofol and etomidate in patients under general anaesthesia. Int J Contemporary Med Res 2016; 3: 3488-90
  6. Kavita M, Rajesh M, Sudhansu SN, Shashi P, Ajit K. A Comparative Study of Effects of Propofol, etomidate and Etomidate plus Propofol induction on hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation: RCT. J Anesth Clin Res 2016; 7: 5.