Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2015 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine Costs and Respiratory Complications in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Obstrüktif Uyku Apnesi Ameliyatı Yapılan Hastalarda Sugammadeks ve Neostigmin Kullanımının Solunum Sistemi Komplikasyonları ve Maliyetinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
387–395
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sugammadex decreases the incidence of post-operative respiratory complications and related costs in patients with SA

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare sugammadex and neostigmine regarding the efficacy in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the incidence of post-operative respiratory complications and costs in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (SA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: After obtaining ethical approval and patient consent, 74 patients in ASA physical status I or II were randomised into two groups to receive 2-mg kg−1 sugammadex (Group S) or 0.04-mg kg−1 neostigmine+0.5-mg atropine (Group N).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sugammadex decreases the incidence of post-operative respiratory complications and related costs in patients with SA
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare sugammadex and neostigmine regarding the efficacy in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block, the incidence of post-operative respiratory complications and costs in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (SA). Methods: After obtaining ethical approval and patient consent, 74 patients in ASA physical status I or II were randomised into two groups to receive 2-mg kg−1 sugammadex (Group S) or 0.04-mg kg−1 neostigmine+0.5-mg atropine (Group N). Groups were compared regarding time to TOF (train-of-four) 0.9, operating room time, post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, post-operative respiratory complications, costs related to neuromuscular block reversal and follow-up and treatment complications.Results: Patient demographics, anaesthesia, surgical data and total rocuronium doses were similar between groups. Time to TOF 0.9 was shorter for group S [Group N: 8 (5–18) min; Group S: 2 (1.5–6) min (p<0.001)]. Operating room time [Group S: 72.4±14.3 min; Group N: 96.6±22.8 min (p<0.001)] and PACU stay [Group S: 22.9±10.1 dk; Group N: 36.3±12.6 dk (p<0.001)] were also shorter in Group S. After extubation, desaturation was observed in 12 (32.4%) patients in group N and in 4 (8%) patients in group S (p=0.048). In group N, three patients were reintubated; there were eight (21.6%) unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. There was one unplanned ICU admission in group S. Negative pressure pulmonary oedema was observed in one patient in group N. The results regarding costs were as follows: the cost of staff anaesthesia doctor was 0.392 TL per min and the cost of nurse anaesthetist was 0.244 TL per min. The reversal cost was higher in the sugammadex group (vial cost 98.14 TL) than that in the neostigmine group (ampoule cost 0.27 TL; total 6147.88 TL vs. 3569.5 TL); however, the total follow-up and complication treatment cost were lower in group S than those in group N (199.5 TL vs. 3944.6 TL). Conclusion: This study confirmed the efficacy of sugammadex over neostigmine for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Sugammadex decreases the incidence of post-operative respiratory complications and related costs in patients with SA

Özet

Amaç: Obstrüktif uyku apnesi (OUA) tanısı ile ameliyat edilen hastalarda sugammadeks ve neostigmin kullanımının roküronyumun etkisini antagonize etme etkinliği, postoperatif solunum komplikasyonlarının oluşma sıklığına etkisi ve maliyetinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntemler: Bu prospektif araştırmada Etik Kurul izni ve hasta onamı alınarak, ASA I-II fizyoloji sınıfındaki, 74 erişkin hasta, randomize olarak 2 mg kg-1 sugammadeks (Grup S) veya 0,04 mg kg-1 neostigmin + 0,5 mg atropin (Grup N) gruplarına dahil edildi. Grupların, TOF (dörtlü uyarı) 0,9 elde edilme süresi, ameliyat salonu kullanım süresi, anestezi sonrası bakım ünitesinde (ASBÜ) izlem süresi, postoperatif solunumla ilgili komplikasyonların görülme sıklığı, izlem, tetkik ve tedavi maliyetleri (Sağlık Uygulama Tebliği) karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hasta, anestezi ve ameliyat özellikleri, toplam rokü- ronyum dozları her iki grupta benzerdi. TOF 0,9 elde edilme süresi sugammadeks grubunda daha kısadır [Grup N: 8 (5-18) dk Grup S: 2 (1,5- 6) dk, p<0,001]. Ameliyat salonu kullanım süresi [Grup S: 72,4±14,3 dk, Grup N: 96,6±22,8 dk (p<0,001)] ve ASBÜ izlem süresi [Grup S: 22,9±10,1 dk, Grup N: 36,3±12,6 dk (p<0,001)] de Grup S'de daha kısa bulundu. Ekstübasyondan sonra, Grup N'de 12 (%32,4), Grup S'de ise 4 (%10,8) hastada desatürasyon tespit edildi (p=0,048). Neostigmin grubunda, 3 hasta tekrar entübe edildi ve 8 (%21,6) planlanmayan yoğun bakıma yatışı oldu. Sugammadeks grubunda 1 (%2,7) hasta yoğun bakıma yatırıldı. Neostigmin grubunda 1 hastada, negatif basınçlı pulmoner ödem gelişti. Maliyet: Anestezi doktor ücreti 0,392 TL dk-1, anestezi tekniker ücreti 0,244 TLdk-1 bulundu. Sugammadeks (98,14 TL birim-1) grubunun tedavi ve izlem maliyeti neostigmin (0,27 TL birim-1) grubundan yüksektir (6147,88 TL'ye karşın 3569,5 TL), neostigmin grubunda ise komplikasyon tedavi maliyeti daha yüksektir (3944,6 TL'ye karşın 199,5 TL). Sonuç: Bu araştırmanın sonuçları, sugammadeksin roküronyumun etkisini neostigminden daha etkin geri döndürdüğünü doğruladı. OUA ameliyatlarından sonra, neostigmin kullanımı ile karşılaştırıldığında sugammadeks kullanımı solunum sistemi komplikasyonları- nın oluşma sıklığı ve kamu maliyetlerinde azalma sağlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, D. Y., BARAN, İ., MUTLU, M., URAL, G., AKKAYA, T., ÖZLÜ, O. (2015). Comparison of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine Costs and Respiratory Complications in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 387–395. https://ajindex.com/articles/370608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gaszynski T, Szewczyk T, Gaszynski W. Randomized comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation in morbidly obese undergoing general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2012
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Işıl CT, Sivrikaya UG, Erol MK, Ekşioğlu B, Hancı A. Postoperative residual curarisation after rocuronium and atracurium. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2011
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Eikermann M, Fassbender P, Malhotra A, Takahashi M, Kubo S, Jordan AS, et al. Unwaranted administration of acetylcholnesterase inhibitors can impair genioglossus and diaphragm muscle function. Anesthesiology 2007
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2010
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Naguib M. Sugammadex: another milestone in clinical neuromuscular pharmacology. Anesth Analg 2007
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Otomo S, Iwasaki H, Takahoko K, Onodera Y, Sasakawa T, Kunisawa T, et al. Prediction of optimal reversal dose of sugammadex after rocuronium administration in adult surgical patients. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2014
  7. 848051. [CrossRef] 7. Ledowski T, Hillyard S, Kozman A, Johnston F, Gillies E, Greenaway M, et al. Unrestricted access to sugammadex: impact on neuromuscular blocking agent choice, reversal practice and associated healthcare costs. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012
  8. Paton F, Paulden M, Chambers D, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, et al. Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Br J Anaesth 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Alkış N, Meço BC. Postoperative residual block and complications Review. Anesthesia 2011
  10. Young T, Evans L, Finn L, Palta M. Estimation of the clinically diagnosed proportion of sleep apnea syndrome in middleaged men and women. Sleep 1997
  11. Memtsoudis S, Liu SS, Ma Y, Chiu YL, Walz JM, Gaber-Baylis LK, et al. Perioperative pulmonary outcomes in patients with sleep apnea after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2011
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Coté CJ, et al. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2006
  13. [CrossRef] 13