Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2021 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Conditions in Turkey: Current Status of Code Blue

Pages
30–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows the current status of ‘code blue’ according to the results of respondent data completing the survey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Globally, previously determined teams activated by ‘code blue’ calls target rapid and organised responses to medical emergency situations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The survey included 36 questions about demographic features and ‘code blue’ practices and procedures.Results: A total of 180 participants were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows the current status of ‘code blue’ according to the results of respondent data completing the survey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Globally, previously determined teams activated by ‘code blue’ calls target rapid and organised responses to medical emergency situations. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) conditions in Turkey.Methods: A web-based survey was sent to anaesthesiologists in Turkey via email. The survey included 36 questions about demographic features and ‘code blue’ practices and procedures.Results: A total of 180 participants were included. The mean working duration was 16.1±7.5 years. Of the anaesthesiologists who participated, 35% worked in university, 26.1% in education and research, 1.7% in city hospitals, 18.9% in state hospitals and 18.3% in private hospitals; 68.3% had CPR certification. There were code blue systems in 97.6% of the organisations. For code blue calls, 71.9% were activated by calling ‘2222’. There were 41.5% organisations with code blue teams of 3–4 people, whereas 26.7% had 2-member teams. Among call responders, 68.5% were anaesthesia technicians/paramedics, 60.7% were anaesthesiologists and 42.7% were anaesthesia assistants. In organisations, 66.3% regularly conducted code blue training. In total, 63.3% of the participants stated that the time to reach the location was nearly 2–4 minutes. During CPR, the use of capnography was 18.3%. Of the participants, 73.8% chose endotracheal intubation as priority airway device during CPR.Conclusion: Today, code blue practice is an important quality criterion for hospitals. This study shows the current status of ‘code blue’ according to the results of respondent data completing the survey. To prevent in-hospital cardiac arrest, a chain of preventive measures should be established, including personnel training, monitoring of patients, recognition of patient deterioration, the presence of a call for help system and effective intervention.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, G. T., ÖZBİLGİN, Ş., UĞUR, Y. L., KUVAKİ, B., BİRBİÇER, H., AKIN, Ş., DORUK, N., TÜRKAN, H., AKAN, M. (2021). Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Conditions in Turkey: Current Status of Code Blue. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/370410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Chan PS, Krein SL, Tang F, Iwashyna TJ, Harrod M, Kennedy M, et al. Resuscitation practices associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA Cardiol 2016: 1: 189-97. [CrossRef] 2. Fendler TJ, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, Chan PS; American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators. Association between hospital rates of early Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and favorable neurological survival among survivors of inhospital cardiac arrest. Am Heart J 2017; 193: 108-16. [CrossRef] 3. van Bogaert P, Clarke S. The Organizational context of nursing practice. 2018: 246-48. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-71042-6 [CrossRef] 4. Available from: https://ishen.ushahidi.io/views/map 5. Eisenberg MS, Psaty BM. Defining and Improving Survival Rates From Cardiac Arrest in US Communities. JAMA 2009; 301: 860-2. [CrossRef] 6. Eroglu SE, Onur Ö, Urgan O, Denizbasi A, Akoglu H. Blue code: Is it a real emergency? World J Emerg Med 2014; 5: 20-3. [CrossRef] 7. Available from: http://tr. wikipedia.org./wiki/hastane _acil_kod_sistemleri, Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2012. 8. Canural R, Gökalp N, Yıldırım K, Şahin M, Korkmaz A, Şahin N ÇF. Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Hasta Güvenliği: Mavi kod Uygulaması Uluslararası Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Kongresi Bildirileri Kitabı. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ankara, 2009; 772: 525-40. 9. Hasta ve Çalışan Güvenliğinin Sağlanmasına Dair Yönetmelik R. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Resmi Gazete 2011: 27897. 10. Murat E, Toprak S, Doğan BD, Mordoğan F. The Code Blue Experiences: Gains, Problems and Troubleshooting. Med Sci 2014; 3: 1002-12. [CrossRef] 11. Jackson JE1, Grugan AS. Code blue: do you know what to do? Nursing 2015; 45: 34-9; quiz 39-40. [CrossRef] 12. Topel A. İskit AT. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sıhhiye Yerleşkesinde Kardiyopulmoner Arreste Yönelik Oluşturulan Mavi Kod Uygulamasının Süreç Ve Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Epidemiyoloji Programı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 2016. 13. Soar J, Nolan JP, Böttiger BW, Perkins GD, Lott C, Carli P, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 100-47. [CrossRef] 14. Tommasi E, Lazzeri C, Bernardo P, Sori A, Chiostri M, Gensini GF, et al. Cooling techniques in mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2017; 18: 459-66. [CrossRef] 15. Dell’anna AM, Scolletta S, Donadello K, Taccone FS. Early neuroprotection after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 20