Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2016 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Influence of Different Doses of Ketamine on Intubating Conditions during a Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation Model

Hızlı Seri İndüksiyon ve Entübasyon Modelinde Farklı Ketamin Dozlarının Entübasyon Kalitesine Etkisi

Pages
26–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Side effects were comparable among all groups.Conclusion: The combination of 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium along with propofol improves intubation conditions in a stimulated rapid-sequence induction model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study aimed to compare the effects of three different doses of ketamine or lidocaine on intubating conditions and haemodynamics in a rapid-sequence induction model with 3 mg kg-1 propofol and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 128 ASA I-III patients who were scheduled for elective surgery were randomized in the following five groups: Group 1 (n=24), 1 mg kg-1 lidocaine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 2 (n=23), 0.1 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 3 (n=29), 0.3 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 4 (n=26), 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium and Group 5 (n=26), 3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium+saline as placebo.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Side effects were comparable among all groups.Conclusion: The combination of 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium along with propofol improves intubation conditions in a stimulated rapid-sequence induction model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study aimed to compare the effects of three different doses of ketamine or lidocaine on intubating conditions and haemodynamics in a rapid-sequence induction model with 3 mg kg-1 propofol and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium. Methods: A total of 128 ASA I-III patients who were scheduled for elective surgery were randomized in the following five groups: Group 1 (n=24), 1 mg kg-1 lidocaine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 2 (n=23), 0.1 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 3 (n=29), 0.3 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium; Group 4 (n=26), 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine+3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium and Group 5 (n=26), 3 mg kg-1 propofol+0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium+saline as placebo. After preoxygenation, induction was performed with the assigned combination, and intubation was initiated after 60 s. The time to intubation, intubation score (Viby-Mogensen score) and haemodynamic data were recorded. Postoperative hoarseness, sore throat and hallucination incidences were followed up.Results: Demographic, time to intubation and haemodynamic data were comparable among groups. Group 4 [13.5 (4-14)] revealed a higher intubation score then groups 1, 2 and 5 [12 (3-14), 11 (2-14) and 9.5 (0-13) and p=0.026, p=0.001 and p=0.000001, respectively]. Groups 3 [13 (4-14)] and 4 [13.5 (4-14)] had similar intubation scores. Side effects were comparable among all groups.Conclusion: The combination of 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine and 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium along with propofol improves intubation conditions in a stimulated rapid-sequence induction model.

Özet

Amaç: Bu prospektif, randomize, çift kör çalışmada, bir hızlı seri indüksiyon ve entübasyon modelinde, 3 mg kg-1 propofol ve 0,6 mg kg-1 rokuroniyum ile yapılan standard indüksiyona 3 farklı ketamin dozunun veya lidokainin eklenmesinin entübasyon kalitesine ve hemodinamik parametreler üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştı- rılması hedeflenmiştir. Yöntemler: Elektif cerrahi planlanan toplam 128 ASA I-III hasta beş gruba randomize edildi. Grup 1 (n=24): lidokain 1 mg kg- 1+propofol 3 mg kg-1+rocuronium 0,6 mg kg-1, Grup 2 (n=23): ketamin 0,1 mg kg-1+propofol 3 mg kg-1+rocuronium 0,6 mg, Grup 3 (n=29): ketamin 0,3 mg kg-1+propofol 3 mg kg-1+rocuronium 0,6 mg, Grup 4 (n=26): ketamin 0,5 mg kg-1 +propofol 3 mg kg-1+rocuronium 0,6 mg kg-1 ve Grup 5 (n=26): propofol 3 mg kg-1+rocuronium 0,6 mg kg-1+ plasebo olarak tanımlandı. Preoksijenasyonu takiben, gruplara uygun indüksiyon yapıldı ve indüksiyondan 60 saniye sonra entübasyon denendi. Entübasyon zamanı ve entübasyon skoru (Viby Mogensen Skoru) ve hemodinamik veriler kaydedildi. Postoperatif ses kısıklığı, boğaz ağrısı ve halüsinasyon insidansı takip edildi. Bulgular: Demografik veriler, entübasyon zamanı ve hemodinamik veriler gruplar arasında benzer olarak değerlendirildi. Grup 4'ün entübasyon skoru [13,5 (4-14)] Grup 1, 2 ve 5'e göre [12 (3-14), 11 (2-14) ve 9,5 (0-13), sırası ile p=0,026, p=0,001, p=0,000001] daha iyi olarak değerlendirildi. Grup 3 [13 (4-14)] ve 4'ün [13,5 (4-14)] skorları benzerdi. Yan etkiler gruplar arasında benzerdi. Sonuç: Ketaminin 0,5 mg kg-1 dozunun 0,6 mg kg-1 rokuroniyum ve propofol ile kombinasyonu, bir hızlı seri indüksiyon modelinde entübasyon koşullarını iyileştirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEÇO, B. C., BERMEDE, A. O., ALANOĞLU, Z., YAKA, O., ALKIŞ, N. (2016). Influence of Different Doses of Ketamine on Intubating Conditions during a Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation Model. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 26–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/370316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Stollings JL, Diedrich DA, Oy LJ. Rapid-sequence ıntubation: a review of the process and considerations when choosing medications. Ann Pharmacother 2014; 48: 62-76. [CrossRef] 2. El-Orbany M, Connolly LA. Rapid sequence induction and intubation: current controversy. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 1318- 25. [CrossRef] 3. Engbaek J, Viby-Mogensen J. Can rocuronium replace succinylcholine in a rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 1-3. [CrossRef] 4. Oh Young A, Cho SJ, Seo KS, Ryu JH, Han SH, Hwang JW. Dose of rocuronium for rapid tracheal intubation following remifentanil 2 µg kg-1 and propofol 2 mg kg-1. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 550-5. [CrossRef] 5. Gopalakrishna MD, Krishna HM, Shenoy UK. The effect of ephedrine on intubating conditions and haemodynamics during rapid tracheal intubation using propofol and rocuronium. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 191-4. [CrossRef] 6. Doğruel B, Varnalı G, Selek Ç, Telci L, Akıncı İÖ. Comparison of different ınduction dose strategies of rocuronium and vecuronium in neuroanaesthesia practice. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2014; 42: 6-11. [CrossRef] 7. Yektaş AK, Şinikoğlu SN, Gümüş F, Çömlekçi M, Erkalp K. Effects of sevoflurane, propofol and midazolam on muscle relaxant properties of rocuronium. Turk J Anaesth Reanim 2012; 40: 71-81. 8. Ledowski T, Wulf H. The influence of fentanyl vs s-ketamine on intubating conditions during induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and rocuronium. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 519- 23. [CrossRef] 9. Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 59-74. [CrossRef] 10. Lowry DW, Carroll MT, Mirakhur RK, Hayes A. Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid sequence induction of anesthesia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 247-52. [CrossRef] 11. Alanoglu Z, Ates Y, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. Is there an ideal approach for rapid-sequence induction in hypertensive patients? Journal of Clin Anesth 2006; 18: 34-40. [CrossRef] 12. Fuchs-Buder T, Sparr HJ, Ziegenfuss T. Thiopental or etomidate for rapid sequence induction with rocuronium. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 504-6. [CrossRef] 13. Hans P, Brichant JF, Hubert B, Dewandre PY, Lamy M. Influence of induction of anaesthesia on intubating conditions one minute after rocuronium administration: comparison of ketamine and thiopentone. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: