AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightRadiation hazards associated with CXR and CT, as well as potentially risky transfer of patients to CT room, can alsobe minimised.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a rapid bedside 6-point lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by an intensive care unit(ICU) physician for detection of four common pathological conditions of the lung, such as alveolar consolidation, pleural effusion, interstitialsyndrome and pneumothorax, in critically ill patients and its comparison with bedside chest X-ray (CXR) and high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax. Volume of pleural effusion measured by LUS and CT thorax was also compared.Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study of 90 adult patients with an acute lung injury score of ≥1 admitted to the medical-surgical ICU. They were examined by CXR and 6-point LUS as per BLUE protocol at bedside, followed by CT thorax in the radiology department.Results: The sensitivity of 6-point LUS for detecting alveolar consolidation, pleural effusion, interstitial syndrome and pneumothorax was 76%,88%, 83% and 89%, respectively, which was remarkably higher than that of CXR. The specificity of LUS was 100% for all pathologies, whichwas again notably higher than that of CXR except for interstitial syndrome for which it was 88.5%. Measurement of volume of pleural effusionby LUS was comparable and had a strong absolute agreement with CT thorax.Conclusion: 6-Point LUS can be a useful diagnostic tool and is better than CXR in diagnosing respiratory pathologies in critically ill patients.Owing to the comparable diagnostic performance of LUS and CT scan and with increasing evidence in favour of LUS, the requirement of CTthorax can be reduced. Radiation hazards associated with CXR and CT, as well as potentially risky transfer of patients to CT room, can alsobe minimised.