Journals / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation / 2021 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Single-Centre Open-Label Comparative Trial of Video-Assisted Fibreoptic-Bronchoscope-Guided Oral Versus Nasal Intubation in Anaesthetised Spontaneously Breathing Paediatric Patients

Pages
37–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The number of attempts needed, first attempt and overall success rate, external manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, subjective assessment of ease of intubation and complications, if any, were also recorded.Results: The time to glottic view (76.26±.7 s vs. 46.33±16.9 s; p=0.001) and total intubation time (4.55±1.07 min vs. 3.05±0.60 min; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the FOI group as compared to the FNI group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Flexible fibreoptic intubation is challenging in paediatric patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We hypothesised that the total time to a successful fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation would be faster through the nasal route when compared to the oral route.Methods: Sixty children aged 6–12 years were randomised to receive fibreoptic tracheal intubation through oral (group FOI) or nasal route (group FNI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The number of attempts needed, first attempt and overall success rate, external manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, subjective assessment of ease of intubation and complications, if any, were also recorded.Results: The time to glottic view (76.26±.7 s vs. 46.33±16.9 s; p=0.001) and total intubation time (4.55±1.07 min vs. 3.05±0.60 min; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the FOI group as compared to the FNI group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Flexible fibreoptic intubation is challenging in paediatric patients. Very few studies have compared fibreoptic intubation via oral and nasal routes in children. We hypothesised that the total time to a successful fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation would be faster through the nasal route when compared to the oral route.Methods: Sixty children aged 6–12 years were randomised to receive fibreoptic tracheal intubation through oral (group FOI) or nasal route (group FNI). We measured the time to glottic view and total time to successful tracheal intubation. The number of attempts needed, first attempt and overall success rate, external manoeuvres needed to obtain an adequate laryngeal view, subjective assessment of ease of intubation and complications, if any, were also recorded.Results: The time to glottic view (76.26±.7 s vs. 46.33±16.9 s; p=0.001) and total intubation time (4.55±1.07 min vs. 3.05±0.60 min; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the FOI group as compared to the FNI group. An overall success rate was 100% in the FNI group and 96.6% in the FOI group. The haemodynamic parameters (mean heart rate and blood pressures) changes were comparable in the two groups at all time intervals. The subjective assessment of ease of intubation was comparable in the two groups (p=0.21). Complications were minor and self-limiting.Conclusion: Intubation guided by a nasal flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope is easier and faster when compared to oral intubation in children aged 6–12 years with normal airway, and it should be preferred for intubation in children requiring fibreoptic intubation.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHARMA, K., GANAPATHY, U., GUPTA, A., BAGGA, D. (2021). Single-Centre Open-Label Comparative Trial of Video-Assisted Fibreoptic-Bronchoscope-Guided Oral Versus Nasal Intubation in Anaesthetised Spontaneously Breathing Paediatric Patients. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/370066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway: with special emphasis on tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1991
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Hasan MA, Black AE. A new technique for fibreoptic intubation in children. Anaesthesia 1994
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Okuyama M, Imai M, Fujisawa A, Kemmotsu O. Fiberoptic intubation under general anaesthesia for children with Goldenhar syndrome. Masui 1994
  4. Blanco G, Melman E, Cuairan V, Moyao D, Ortiz-Monasterio F. Fibreoptic nasal intubation in children with anticipated and unanticipated difficult intubation. Pediatric Anesth 2001
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Sunder RA, Haile DT, Farrell PT, Sharma A. Pediatric airway management: current practices and future directions. Paediatr Anaesth 2012
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Litman RS, Fiadjoe JE, Stricker PA, Cote CJ. The pediatric airway. In: Cote CJ, Lerman J, Anderson JB, eds. A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2013
  7. Duggan L, Jagannathan N. Unique airway issues in the pediatric population. In: Hung O, Murphy M, eds. Management of the Diffi cult and Failed Airway. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 8. Sims C, vonUngern-Sternberg BS. The normal and the challenging pediatric airway. Paediatr Anaesth 2012
  8. [CrossRef] 9. Weiss M, Engelhardt T. Proposal for the management of the unexpected diffi cult pediatric airway. Paediatr Anaesth 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Roth AG, Wheeler M, Stevenson GW, Hall SC. Comparison of a rigid laryngoscope with the ultrathin fi breoptic laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in infants. Can J Anaesth 1994
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Wheeler M, Roth AG, Dsida RM, Rae B, Seshadri R, Sullivan CL, et al. Teaching residents pediatric fi beroptic intubation of the trachea: traditional fi berscope with an eyepiece versus a video-assisted technique using a fi berscope with an integrated camera. Anesthesiology 2004
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Jagannathan N, Sequera-Ramos L, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Wasson N, et al. Randomized comparison of experts and trainees with nasal and oral fi breoptic intubation in children less than 2yr of age. Br J Anaesth 2015
  12. [CrossRef] 13. Xue FS, Li CW, Liu KP, Sun HT, Zhang GH, Xu YC, et al. Circulatory Responses to Fiberoptic Intubation in Anesthetized Children: A Comparison of Oral and Nasal Routes. Anesth Analg 2007
  13. [CrossRef] 14. Johnson C, Roberts JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fi ber