Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4

Neurodevelopmental Findings and Epilepsy in Malformations of Cortical Development

Pages
356–365
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients should be followed up closely with EEG.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study is to classify the malformations of cortical development in childrenaccording to the embryological formation, localization, and neurodevelopmental findings.Seizure/epilepsy and electrophysiological findings have also been compared.Material and Methods: Seventy-five children (age: 1 month-16.5 years; 56% male) followed withthe diagnosis of malformation of cortical development, in Marmara University Pendik Researchand Educational Hospital Department of Pediatric Neurology, were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Theirepilepsy characteristics, electroencephalogram (EEG) findings, and prognosis were reported.Neurodevelopmental characteristics were evaluated by the Bayley Scales of Infant and ToddlerDevelopment (Bayley-III) for the ages of 0-42 months (n = 30); the Denver DevelopmentalScreening Test-II (DDST-II) for ages 42 months-6 years (n = 11); and the Wechsler IntelligenceScales for Children (WISC-R), used for children 6 years and older (n = 34).Results: The patients were classified as 44% premigrational (14.6% microcephaly, 24% tuberoussclerosis, 2.7% focal cortical dysplasia, 1.3% hemimegalencephaly, and 1.3% diffuse cortical dysgenesis);17.3% migrational (14.6% lissencephaly, 2.7% heterotopia); and 38.6% postmigrational(14.6% schizencephaly, 24% polymicrogyria) developmentally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients should be followed up closely with EEG.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: The purpose of this study is to classify the malformations of cortical development in childrenaccording to the embryological formation, localization, and neurodevelopmental findings.Seizure/epilepsy and electrophysiological findings have also been compared.Material and Methods: Seventy-five children (age: 1 month-16.5 years; 56% male) followed withthe diagnosis of malformation of cortical development, in Marmara University Pendik Researchand Educational Hospital Department of Pediatric Neurology, were included in the study. Theirepilepsy characteristics, electroencephalogram (EEG) findings, and prognosis were reported.Neurodevelopmental characteristics were evaluated by the Bayley Scales of Infant and ToddlerDevelopment (Bayley-III) for the ages of 0-42 months (n = 30); the Denver DevelopmentalScreening Test-II (DDST-II) for ages 42 months-6 years (n = 11); and the Wechsler IntelligenceScales for Children (WISC-R), used for children 6 years and older (n = 34).Results: The patients were classified as 44% premigrational (14.6% microcephaly, 24% tuberoussclerosis, 2.7% focal cortical dysplasia, 1.3% hemimegalencephaly, and 1.3% diffuse cortical dysgenesis);17.3% migrational (14.6% lissencephaly, 2.7% heterotopia); and 38.6% postmigrational(14.6% schizencephaly, 24% polymicrogyria) developmentally. According to involved area, theclassification was 34.7% hemispheric/multilobar, 33.3% diffuse, and 32% focal. Seventy-five percentof the patients had a history of epilepsy, and 92% were resistant to treatment. The seizuresstarted before the age of 12 months in diffuse malformations, and epileptic encephalopathywas more common in microcephaly with a rate of 80% and lissencephaly with a rate of 54.5%in the first EEGs. Ninety-five percent of patients had at least one level of neurodevelopmentaldelay detected by DDST/Bayley-III; this was more common in patients with accompanyingepilepsy (P < .05). As seen more commonly in patients with diffuse pathologies and intractablefrequent seizures, mental retardation was detected by WISC-R in 64.5% of patients (P < .05).Conclusion: In cases with cortical developmental malformation, epilepsy/EEG features andneurodevelopmental prognosis can be predicted depending on the developmental process andtype and extent of involvement. Patients should be followed up closely with EEG.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAH, O., TÜRKDOĞAN, D., KÜÇÜK, S., TAKIŞ, G., ASADOV, R., ÖZTÜRK, G., ÜNVER, O., EKİNCİ, G. (2021). Neurodevelopmental Findings and Epilepsy in Malformations of Cortical Development. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 4, 356–365. https://ajindex.com/articles/369998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Koehn MA, Duchowny M. Preoperative clinical evaluation and noninvasive electroencephalogram in cortical dysplasia. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2002
  2. 13(1):35-9, viii. [CrossRef] 2. Sisodiya SM. Malformations of cortical development: Burdens and insights from important causes of human epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2004
  3. 3(1):29-38. [CrossRef] 3. Guerrini R, Sicca F, Parmeggiani L. Epilepsy and malformations of the cerebral cortex. Epileptic Disord. 2003
  4. 5(suppl 2):S9-26. 4. Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: Update 2012. Brain. 2012
  5. 135(5):1348-1369. [CrossRef] 5. Gungor S. Evaluation of Malformations of Cortical Development: Clinic, EEG and Neuroimaging Feature (Tıpta Uzmanlık tezi). Ankara: Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Pediatrics
  6. Kane N, Acharya J, Benickzy S, et al. A revised glossary of terms most commonly used by clinical electroencephalographers and updated proposal for the report format of the EEG findings. Revision 2017. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2017
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Bayley N. Technical Manual of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
  8. Bayley N. Manuel for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
  9. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
  10. Gocer C, Kavuncuoğlu S, Arslan G, et al. Neurodevelopmental problems of very low birth weight premature infants and factors affecting neurological morbidity. Turk Pediatr Ars. 2011
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Stephens BE, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the premature infant. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009
  12. 56(3):631-646. [CrossRef] 12. Vanlı L. Doğum ağırlığı normal olan bebekler ile doğum ağırlığı düşük olan bebeklerin ilk altı ay içindeki psikomotor gelişmeleri. Türk Psikoloji. Derg (Türk Pediatr Dizini). 1982
  13. Ozelli LB. A pilot study with the Bayley infant scales of mental and motor development-a Turkish sample. Turk J Pediatr. 1978
  14. 20(1–2):35-43. 14. Janssen AJ, Nijhuis‐van der Sanden MW, Akkermans RP, Oostendorp RA, Kollée LA. Influence of behaviour and risk factors on motor performance in preterm infants at age 2 to 3 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008
  15. 50(12):926-931. [CrossRef] 15. Yalaz K, Anlar B, Denver BB II, Tarama Testi G. Türkiye Standardizasyonu. Ankara: Anıl G