Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 5

Do the Children of Mothers with Optimum PICCOLO Scores Have Better Denver II Test Results?

Pages
423–428
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When adjusted for child’s age, gender, presence of a sibling, maternal age, mother’s education level, mother’s occupation, and household size, multiple logistic regression revealed higher rates for optimum responsiveness and encouragement domains, and total scores in age-appropriate and questionable groups, than in the delayed development group (P < .05).Conclusion: Supporting all areas, especially the responsive and encouragement domains in mother–child interactions, may improve child development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Positive parenting skills, especially mother–child interactions, are associated with positive effects in countless areas of child development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to evaluate mother–child interactions in children with developmental delay compared to those with age-appropriate development.Material and Methods: Children aged 1-5 years admitted to the outpatient clinic for child health supervision were evaluated for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When adjusted for child’s age, gender, presence of a sibling, maternal age, mother’s education level, mother’s occupation, and household size, multiple logistic regression revealed higher rates for optimum responsiveness and encouragement domains, and total scores in age-appropriate and questionable groups, than in the delayed development group (P < .05).Conclusion: Supporting all areas, especially the responsive and encouragement domains in mother–child interactions, may improve child development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Positive parenting skills, especially mother–child interactions, are associated with positive effects in countless areas of child development. We aimed to evaluate mother–child interactions in children with developmental delay compared to those with age-appropriate development.Material and Methods: Children aged 1-5 years admitted to the outpatient clinic for child health supervision were evaluated for the study. A 10-minute video recording was obtained while the participant mother–child couple played together in a room. Children were divided into 3 developmental groups using the Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST-II); as age-appropriate, questionable, and delayed. Mother–child interaction was assessed using the “Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes” (PICCOLO) tool.Results: A total of 142 children, whose developmental status was evaluated according to DDST-II and were grouped as age-appropriate (59), questionable (39), and delayed (44), were included in the study. The mean age of the children was 29.0 ± 11.9 months. The median PICCOLO score was 43 (interquartile range (IQR)=36-47) in the age-appropriate developmental group, 44 (IQR=35-51) in the questionable group, and 36 (IQR=32-45) in the delayed group. When adjusted for child’s age, gender, presence of a sibling, maternal age, mother’s education level, mother’s occupation, and household size, multiple logistic regression revealed higher rates for optimum responsiveness and encouragement domains, and total scores in age-appropriate and questionable groups, than in the delayed development group (P < .05).Conclusion: Supporting all areas, especially the responsive and encouragement domains in mother–child interactions, may improve child development.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAR, G., YALÇIN, S. S., BAYOĞLU, B. (2021). Do the Children of Mothers with Optimum PICCOLO Scores Have Better Denver II Test Results?. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 5, 423–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/369952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Yalçin SS, Yurdakök K, Açikgöz D, Özmert E. Short‐term developmental outcome of iron prophylaxis in infants. Pediatr Int. 2000
  2. 42(6):625-630. [CrossRef] 2. Yalçın SS TS, Güçiz-Doğan B, Yurdakök K. Ankara Atatürk Çocuk Yuvası'ndaki çocuklarda Denver II testleri ve test sonuçlarına etki eden faktörler. Turk J Pediatr. 1998
  3. Bencik S, YalYalçin S, Yilmaz G, Yalçinkaya F. Teacher-identified smart children: Low somatic problems and high communication levels 由教師鑑定的資優兒童: 低軀體化症狀及高溝通水平. HK J Paediatr (new series). 2012
  4. 17(3):156-161. 4. Campbell F, Conti G, Heckman JJ, et al. Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science. 2014
  5. 343(6178):1478- 1485. [CrossRef] 5. Organization WH. Improving Mother/Child Interaction to Promote Better Psychosocial Development in Children. Geneva: World Health Organization
  6. Urbain-Gauthier N, Wendland J. Mother–child interactions in young children with excessive physical aggression and in typically developing young children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017
  7. 22(3):467-482. [CrossRef] 7. De Falco S, Emer A, Martini L,, Rigo P, Pruner S, Venuti P. Predictors of mother–child interaction quality and child attachment security in at-risk families. Front Psychol. 2014
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Shah R, Sobotka SA, Chen YF, Msall ME. Positive parenting practices, health disparities, and developmental progress. Pediatrics. 2015
  9. 136(2):318-326. [CrossRef] 9. Gordon N. Some influences on cognition in early life: A short review of recent opinions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1998
  10. 2(1):1-5. [CrossRef] 10. Arias D, Peña M. Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: The communicative value of infant-directed talking and singing. Psychopathology. 2016
  11. 49(4):217-227. [CrossRef] 11. Hallas D, Koslap-Petraco M, Fletcher J. Social-emotional development of toddlers: Randomized controlled trial of an office-based intervention. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Anlar B, Denver YK II. Developmental screening test manual: Adaptation and standardization for Turkish children. Meteksan. 1996. 13. Frankenburg WK, Goldstein AD, Camp BW. The revised Denver Developmental Screening Test: İts accuracy as a screening instrument. J Pediatr. 1971
  13. 79(6):988-995. [CrossRef] 14. Ayar G, Köksal T, Kurt F, et al. Mother-child interaction and the development status of children who have been accidentally poisoned. Turk J Pediatr. 2020
  14. 62(1):61-67. [CrossRef] 15. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Jump Norman V, Christiansen K. Par