Journals / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale

Pages
230–235
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theinternal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86.Conclusion: As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale wasfound to be a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish society, which consists of 9 items and 2sub-dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was planned to adapt the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to Turkish and evaluateits validity and reliability.Material and Methods: This research was conducted methodologically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the studyconsisted of 317 individuals from the patient relatives in the waiting rooms, who have childrenbetween the ages 9-16, who applied to the Suleyman Demirel University Hospital policlinic inDecember 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theinternal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86.Conclusion: As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale wasfound to be a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish society, which consists of 9 items and 2sub-dimensions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study was planned to adapt the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to Turkish and evaluateits validity and reliability.Material and Methods: This research was conducted methodologically. The sample of the studyconsisted of 317 individuals from the patient relatives in the waiting rooms, who have childrenbetween the ages 9-16, who applied to the Suleyman Demirel University Hospital policlinic inDecember 2019. A questionnaire developed by the researcher and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scalewere used as data collection tools.Results: Explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis methods were used toevaluate the validity and reliability of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. In the Vaccine HesitancyScale, the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin coefficient was 0.897 and the Bartlett test’s chi-square valuewas 1319.67 and the result was significant (P <0.001). Considering the factor loads of the items, itvaries between 0.608 and 0.845. As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, it was seen thatthe scale consists of two factors. This finding is consistent with the original form of the scale. Theinternal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86.Conclusion: As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale wasfound to be a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish society, which consists of 9 items and 2sub-dimensions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNAL, Ö., EROĞLU, H. N., EVCİL, F. Y., USKUN, E. (2021). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3, 230–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/369917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kutlu R. Çocukluk Çağı Aşıları[Vaccines during childhood]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Fam Med-Special Topics 2017; 8: 311-8
  2. Haverkate M, D’Ancona F, Giambi C, et al. Mandatory and recommended vaccination in the EU, Iceland, and Norway: Results of the VENICE 2010 survey on the ways of implementing national vaccination programmes. Euro Surveill 2012; 17:20183. [Crossref] 3. Gangarosa EJ, Galazka A, Wolfe C, et al. Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: The untold story. Lancet 1998; 351: 356-61. [Crossref] 4. WHO. Immunization coverage. Immunization coverage Available from:
  3. Boom JA, Cunningham RM. Understanding and managing vaccine concerns: Springer; 2014. [Crossref] 6. WHO. The SAGE vaccine hesitancy working group what influences Vaccine Acceptance: A model of determinants of vaccine hesitancy. Available from: https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/ meetings/2014/october/1_Report_WORKING_GROUP_vaccine_ hesitancy_final.pdf
  4. Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Schulz WS, et al. Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. Vaccine 2015; 33: 4165-75. [Crossref] 8. Gür E. Aşı kararsızlığı-aşı reddi [Vaccine hesitancy - vaccine refusal]. Türk Pediatri Arşivi 2019; 54: 1-2. [Crossref] 9. Bora B, Ülgü MM, Soytutan Çİ, et al. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı [Health Statistics of 2017 from Health Ministry of Turkey]. Ankara; Sağlık Bilgi Sistemleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayınları: 2018;140
  5. Enstitüsü HÜNE. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması TNSA 2013: Ana Rapor. 2013. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu. tr/tnsa2013/rapor/TNSA_2013_ana_rapor.pdf Accessed on: December 02 2016
  6. Enstitüsü HÜNE. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması TNSA 2018: Ana Rapor. Available from: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/ tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf. Accessed on: February 4 2020
  7. Sökel SK, Önal Ö. Birinci Basamak Sağlık Personelinin Mevsimsel İnfluenza Aşısı Hakkındaki Bilgi ve Tutumları [Knowledge and attitudes of primary health care personnel about influenza vaccine]. Konuralp Med J 2016; 8. [Crossref] 13. Türkay M, Gülçin A, Aktekin MR. Antalya İlinde Seçilmiş Bir Grupta Aşı Karşıtı Olma Durumu [Vaccine refusal among a selected group in Antalya]. Akd Med J 2017; 2: 107-12
  8. Shapiro GK, Tatar O, Dube E, et al. The vaccine hesitancy scale: Psychometric properties and validation. Vaccine 2018;36: 660-7. [Crossref]