Journals / Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Ürolojik cerrahide üç farklı intratekal levobupivakain dozunun karşılaştırılması

Comparison of three different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine in urological surgery

Pages
214–219
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We concluded that the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine was superior to the isobaric forms in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of hyperbaric and isobaric solutions of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cases were randomly divided into three groups of 20 patients each.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We concluded that the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine was superior to the isobaric forms in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Enjeksiyon · spinal · Analjezi

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of hyperbaric and isobaric solutions of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery. Patients and Methods: The study included urological patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia. The cases were randomly divided into three groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 received 13.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine, group 2 received 12.5 mg isobaric levobupivacaine and group 3 received 15 mg isobaric levobupivacaine in a total volume of 3 ml intrathecally. Sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, pain scores, adverse effects and analgesic requirements of the patients were recorded. Results: The time to reach T10 sensory block and the onset time to Bromage 0 were statistically different among the three groups (p<0.05). The mean time to reach T10 was significantly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2 (p<0.001). Regarding the mean onset time to Bromage 0, group 1 had a lower mean value than that of group 3 (p<0.001). The mean duration for analgesic requirement was longer in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). Conclusion: We concluded that the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine was superior to the isobaric forms in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı transüretral endoskopik cerrahide intratekal izobarik ve hiperbarik levobupivakainin etkinliğini kıyaslamaktır. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya, spinal anestezi altında elektif ürolojik cerrahi planlanan olgular alındı. Olgular rastgele 20 hastadan oluşan üç gruba ayrıldı. İntratekal yolla toplamda 3'er ml, Grup 1 olgulara (n=20) 13.5 mg hiperbarik levobupivakain, Grup 2 olgulara (n=20) 12.5 mg izobarik levobupivakain ve Grup 3 olgulara (n=20) 15 mg izobarik levobupivakain uygulandı. Tüm olgularda duyusal ve motor blok, hemodinamik parametreler, ağrı skorları, yan etkiler ve analjezik gereksinimler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Ortalama T10 duyusal blok ve Bromage 0'a ulaşma süreleri açısından gruplar arası farklılık saptandı (p<0.05). Grup 2 ile kıyaslandığında Grup 1'de T10'a ulaşma süresi belirgin bir şekilde daha düşüktü (p<0.001). Motor bloğun kalkması (Bromage 0 düzeyine erişme süreleri) için geçen süre Grup 1'de Grup 3'ten daha düşük değere sahipti (p<0.001). Ameliyat sonrası ilk analjezik gereksinimi için geçen süre Grup 1'de Grup 2 ve 3'ten daha uzun bulundu (sırasıyla p<0.05 ve p<0.001). Sonuç: Transüretral endoskopik cerrahi için yapılan spinal anestezide hiperbarik form levobupivakainin klinik etkisinin, izobarik formlardan daha etkin olduğu sonucuna vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, H., AKBAŞ, M., SIZLAN, A., ATEŞ, F., DERE, K., GÜNDÜ, İ., ÖZKAN, S., DAĞLI, G. (2009). Ürolojik cerrahide üç farklı intratekal levobupivakain dozunun karşılaştırılması. Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 214–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/369817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gristwood RW. Cardiac and CNS toxicity of levobupivacaine: strengths of evidence for advantage over bupivacaine. Drug Saf 2002;25:153-63
  2. Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998;46:245-9
  3. Kopacz DJ, Allen HW. Accidental intravenous levobupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1027-9
  4. Cox CR, Checketts MR, Mackenzie N, Scott NB, Bannister J. Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:594-8
  5. Cox CR, Faccenda KA, Gilhooly C, Bannister J, Scott NB, Morrison LM. Extradural S(-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:289-93
  6. Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003;31:637-41
  7. Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, Heinz MT, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S, et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2002;94:194-8
  8. Alley EA, Kopacz DJ, McDonald SB, Liu SS. Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg 2002;94:188-93
  9. Vercauteren MP, Hans G, De Decker K, Adriaensen HA. Levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil and epinephrine for intrathecal labor analgesia: a comparison with racemic bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 2001;93:996-1000
  10. Vanna O, Chumsang L, Thongmee S. Levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89:1133-9
  11. Turan A, Kaya G, Öztürk N, Pamukçu Z. Spinal anestezi uygulanan bir olguda antidepresan kullanımına bağlı konvulsiyon. Trakya Univ Tıp Fak Derg 2003;20:43-6
  12. Çolak A, İnal MT, Arar C, Oğuzhan N, Pamukçu Z. Yüksek kardiyak riskli hastada sürekli spinal anestezi uygulaması. Trakya Univ Tıp Fak Derg 2007;24:150-2
  13. Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK, Cheung AS. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005;22:899-903.