Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6

Bond strength of tension lap-splices in full scale-compacting concrete beams

Pages
377–386
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that as the diameter of the steel bar increased from 16 to 20 mm the bond strength decreased regardless of concrete type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Twelve full-scale beam specimens (2000 × 300 × 200 mm) were tested in positive bending with the loading system designed to determine the effect of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and the diameter of reinforcement on bond-slip characteristics of tension lap-slices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The splice length of the deformed bars was set at 310 mm in all beam specimens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that as the diameter of the steel bar increased from 16 to 20 mm the bond strength decreased regardless of concrete type.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Twelve full-scale beam specimens (2000 × 300 × 200 mm) were tested in positive bending with the loading system designed to determine the effect of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and the diameter of reinforcement on bond-slip characteristics of tension lap-slices. The specimens of lap-splice series were tested with lap-spliced bars centred on the midspan in a region of constant positive bending. The splice length of the deformed bars was set at 310 mm in all beam specimens. This value was selected to develop a steel stress less than yield to ensure splitting mode failure in all beam specimens. The beams were cast with the 16 and 20 mm bars (the tension lap-splices) in the bottom position. The casting procedure was the same for all beams. Two types of concrete were used in the experimental programme, including normal concrete (NC), with a slump less than 68 mm, as the comparatively low-slump concrete, and SCC as an extremely high-workability concrete. The variables used in this study were the concrete type (SCC and NC) and reinforcing bar size (16 and 20 mm). It was found that as the diameter of the steel bar increased from 16 to 20 mm the bond strength decreased regardless of concrete type. Finally, although the compressive strength of concretes was almost the same and there were slight differences between the diameters of lap-spliced bars, the normalised bond strengths of the SCC mixes were about 4% higher than those of the NC mixes for both bar diameters, indicating that the reinforcing bar was completely covered by SCC due to its filling ability.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRK, K., BENLİ, A., CALAYIR, Y. (2008). Bond strength of tension lap-splices in full scale-compacting concrete beams. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 6, 377–386. https://ajindex.com/articles/369139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Azizinamini, A., Stark, M., Roller, J.J. and Ghosh, S.K., “Bond Performance of Reinforcing Bars Embedded in High-Strength Concrete”, ACI Structural Journal, 90, 554-561, 1993.
  2. Chan Y.W., Chen, Y.S. and Liu, Y.S., “Development of Bond Strength of Reinforcing Steel in Self- Consolidation Concrete”, ACI Structural Journal, 100, 490-498, 2003.
  3. Darwin, D., Zuo, J., Tholen, M.L. and Idun, E.K., “Development Length Criteria for Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars”, ACI Structural Journal, 93, 347-359, 1996.
  4. Dogangun, A., “Betonarme yapıların hesap ve tasarımı”, Birsen Yayınevi, Turkey, 2003. EFNARC, “European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete”, Specification and Production and Use, Association House,UK,(www.efnarc.org), 2005.
  5. Esfahani, M.R., Lachemi, M. and Kianoush, M.R., “Top-Bar Effect of Steel Bars in Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC)”, Cement and Concrete Composite, 30, 52- 60, 2008.
  6. Esfahani, M.R. and Rangan, B.V., “Bond between Normal Strength and High-Strength Concrete and Reinforcing Bars in Splices in Beams”, ACI Structural Journal, 95, 272-280, 1998.
  7. Ezeldin, A.S. and Balaguru, P N. “Bond Behavior of Normal and High Strength Fiber-Reinforced Concrete”, ACI Structural Journal, 86, 515-524, 1989. Hoshino M., “Relationships between Bleeding, Coarse Aggregate, and Specimen Height of Concrete”, ACI Materials Journal, 86, 185-190, 1989.
  8. Hwang, S.J., Leu, Y.R. and Hwang, H.L., Tensile Bond Strengths of Deformed Bars of High-Performance Strength Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 93, 11-20, 1996.
  9. Okamura, H. and Ozawa, K., “Mix Design for Self- Compacting Concrete”, Concrete Libr. JSCE, 25, 107- 120, 1995.
  10. Orangun, C.O., Jirsa, J.O. and Breen, J.E., “A Reevaluation of Test Data on Development Length and Splices”, ACI Journal, 74, 114-122, 1977.
  11. Turk, K., Caliskan, S. and Yildirim, M.S., “Influence of Loading Condition and Reinforcement Size on The Concrete / Reinforcement Bond Strength”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 19, 337-346, 2005.
  12. Turk, K. and Yildirim, M.S., “Bond Strength of Reinforcement in Splices in Beams”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 16, 469-478, 2003.
  13. Valcuende, M. and Para, C., “Bond Behaviour of Reinforcement in Self-Compacting Concretes”, Construction and Building Materials, 23, 162-170, 2009.
  14. Yerlici, V.A. and ¨Ozturan T., “Factor Affecting Anchorage Bond Strength in High-Performance Concrete”, ACI Structural Journal, 97, 499-507, 2000.
  15. Zhu, W., Sonebi, M. and Bartos, P.J.M., “Bond and Interfacial Pro