Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Dissolved nutrient behaviour along the estuarine salinity gradient at the Gediz River mouth (Aegean See, Turkey

Pages
67–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, simultaneous sampling carried out over the entire bay area provided an opportunity to study the effects of the river on the bay during periods of maximum and minimum discharge.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Gediz River is the largest fresh water source for ˙Izmir Bay.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several studies have been carried out on the river’s physical and biogeochemical dynamics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, simultaneous sampling carried out over the entire bay area provided an opportunity to study the effects of the river on the bay during periods of maximum and minimum discharge.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Gediz River is the largest fresh water source for ˙Izmir Bay. Several studies have been carried out on the river’s physical and biogeochemical dynamics. However, there has not been a particular geographical focus on the mouth of the river. In this study, along the salinity gradient towards the bay in 2004 and 2005, the dissolved inorganic nutrients were seasonally measured at the river mouth. During the sampling period, the concentration of the constituents showed variability in the range of 0.04-156 $\mu M$ for $NO^-_3$ , 0.02-12 $\mu M$ for $NO^{-2}$ , 0-237 $\mu M$ for $NH^+_4$ , 0.02-26 $\mu M$ for $PO^{3-}_4$ , and 1-293 $\mu M$ for $SiO_2$, while the river discharge fluctuated between 5.2 and 123 m3/s. Resulting highly contrasted salinity gradients between 0.29 and 39.62 psu significantly influenced the concentrations of dissolved inorganic nutrients. Furthermore, simultaneous sampling carried out over the entire bay area provided an opportunity to study the effects of the river on the bay during periods of maximum and minimum discharge.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜZAL, A., BİZSEL, N., BİZSEL, K. C., HÜSREVOĞLU, Y. S. (2008). Dissolved nutrient behaviour along the estuarine salinity gradient at the Gediz River mouth (Aegean See, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 67–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/369085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aksu, A.E., Ya¸sar, D. and Uslu, O., “Assessment of Marine Pollution in ˙Izmir Bay: Heavy Metal and Organic Compound Concentrations in Surficial Sediments”, Turkish. J. Eng. Env. Sci. 22, 387-415, 1998.
  2. Altnayar, G., “Assessment for Problems of Gala Lake, Reasons and Solutions” (In Turkish), DS˙I General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, XI. Regional Directorate, Edirne, 46, 2003.
  3. Atici, T. and Ahiska, S., “Pollution and Algae of Ankara Stream”, G.¨U. Journal of Natural Sciences, 18, 51-59, 2005.
  4. Batki, H. “Assessment of Chemical Parameters for Gediz River” (in Turkish), PhD Thesis, Ege University Department of Aquaculture, 93, 2002.
  5. Bayar, M. and Oğuz, F., “Analysis of Stream Polution in Gediz Basin” (in Turkish), Dokuz Eylül University Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate Project, 1990.
  6. Bennekon, A.J., Van Gieskes, W.W.C. and Tijssen, S.B., “Eutrophication of Dutch Coastal Waters”, Royal Society of Proceedings 189, 359-374, 1975.
  7. Bizsel, C., Bizsel N., S¨uzal, A., Demirdağ, A. and Öztürk, M. Transportation of Particle and Dissolved Organic and Inorganic Matters through the Salinity Gradient around the Mouth of Gediz River (İzmir Bay, Aegean Sea). TÜBİTAK CAYDAG, Project No: 104Y037, 2008.
  8. Boran, M. and Sivri, N., “Nutrient and Total Suspended Solitude Determination for Solak and Surmene brooks (Trabzon, TURKEY)” (in Turkish), E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences. 18, 343-348, 2001.
  9. Boyacioglu, H., “Surface Water Quality Assessment Using Factor Analysis”, http://www.wrc.org.za. ISSN 0378-4738 = Water SA Vol. 32 No. 3, ISSN 1816-7950 = Water SA (on-line), 2006.
  10. Briggs, J.C. and Ficke, F.J., “Quality of Rivers of the United States”, 1975Water Year-Based on the National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN): US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 78, 200-436, 1977.
  11. Boynton, W.R., Garber, J.H., Summers, R. and Kemp, W.M., “Inputs, Transformations and Transport of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and Selected Tributaries”, Estuaries, 18, 285-314, 1995.
  12. Brzezinski, M.A. “The Si:C:N Ratio of Marine Diatoms: Interspecific Variability and the Effect of some Environmental Variables”, Journal of Phycology, 21, 347-357, 1985. Defra, “Developing Measures to Promote Catchment- Sensitive Farming. A Joint Defra-HM Treasury Consultation”, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, www.defra.gov.uk, 2004. DMİGM, ”Republic of Turkey Ministry of Enviroment and Forestry Turkish State Meteoro