Journals / Journal of Research in Economics / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

TWO PHASES OF DEINDUSTRIALIZATION POLICIES IN ISTANBUL

İSTANBUL’DA SANAYİSİZLEŞME POLİTİKALARININ İKİ SAFHASI

Pages
186–207
Publication Date
2018-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although Istanbul is still the primary center of Turkish manufacturing, the results show that the deindustrialization policies reduced the share of Istanbul in the Turkish manufacturing sector while at the same time deteriorating its quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The city of Istanbul is the economic and cultural heart of Turkey and is one of the oldest industrial regions in the country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, its share of the manufacturing sector in the Turkish economy has been steadily declining since the 1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although Istanbul is still the primary center of Turkish manufacturing, the results show that the deindustrialization policies reduced the share of Istanbul in the Turkish manufacturing sector while at the same time deteriorating its quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sanayisizleşme · Verimlilik Değişmesi · Firma Büyüklüğü

Abstract

The city of Istanbul is the economic and cultural heart of Turkey and is one of the oldest industrial regions in the country. However, its share of the manufacturing sector in the Turkish economy has been steadily declining since the 1980s. It is possible to define two different phases of deindustrialization during the last several decades. Discouraging new manufacturing investments was the goal of the first phase. During the second phase, priority was given to financial and real estate activities, as favored alternatives to manufacturing. The aim of the paper is to trace the effects of this policy on the structure of the manufacturing sector in Istanbul over the course of deindustrialization in Istanbul. Although Istanbul is still the primary center of Turkish manufacturing, the results show that the deindustrialization policies reduced the share of Istanbul in the Turkish manufacturing sector while at the same time deteriorating its quality.

Özet

İstanbul kenti Türkiye’nin ekonomik ve kültürel kalbi ve ülkenin en eski sanayi bölgelerinden biridir. Ancak, İstanbul’daki imalat sanayinin Türkiye ekonomisindeki payı 1980 yılından bu yana istikrarlı bir şekilde düşmektedir. Son dönemler için iki farklı sanayisizleşme safhası tanımlamak mümkündür. Yeni

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRUEL, A. S., DOĞRUEL, F. (2018). TWO PHASES OF DEINDUSTRIALIZATION POLICIES IN ISTANBUL. Journal of Research in Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 186–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/3690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ARUP, (undated), Istanbul International Financial Center. ARUP (ARUP is a global firm of consulting engineers, designers, planners, and project managers.)http://www.arup.com/Projects/Istanbul_International_Financial_Centre.aspx [Accessed on May 30, 2014, 12:10]. Audretsch, D. B., Oliver, F., and Stephan, H. (2007). It’s All in Marshall: The Impact of External Economies on Regional Dynamics, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2094, (September). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1016956
  2. Barff, R. A., and Prentice, L K. (2006).
  3. Dynamic Shift-Share Analysis, Growth and Change, 19(2):1-10.
  4. Bilsel, C. (2007). Yayın Değerlendirme: Cumhuriyet Dönemi Istanbul Planlama Raporları 1934-1995, Mimarlık, 338, Kasım-Aralık. http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=288&RecID=1662
  5. Clark, C. (1967). Von Thünen’s Isolated State, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 19(3): 370-377.
  6. Creamer, D. B. (1943). Industrial Location and National Resources, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Doğruel, F. (2013). Deindustrialization of Old Industrial Regions in Turkey, Rives Méditerranéennes, 46: 93-108.
  7. Doğruel, F., and Doğruel, A. S. (2006). Openness and Regional Distribution of Turkish Manufacturing Industries, Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies (electronic journal), 8. http://www.luc.edu/orgs/meea/volume8/PDFS/Dogruel.pdf
  8. Doğruel, F., and Doğruel, A. S. (2011). Privatization and Regional Distribution of Manufacturing in Turkey, Turkish Economic Association, Discussion Paper 2011/4. http://www.tek.org.tr
  9. Doğruel, F., and Doğruel, A. S. (2012).
  10. Openness, Technological Changes, and Differentiation in Turkish Manufacturing Sector. Hadi S. Esfahani and G. Tuna (Ed.), Economic Development in the Middle East and North African Countries: Some Contemporary Issues, in: 1-17, New York: Novascience Publishing House. DPT (1995) VII. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı 1996-2000, Ankara: DPT Publication. http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/vii/plan7.pdf
  11. Duranay, N., Gürsel, E., and Ural, S. (1972). Cumhuriyetten Bu Yana Istanbul Planlaması, Mimarlık, 105: 67-108. http://dergi.mo.org.tr/dergiler/4/421/6606.pdf
  12. Feldstein, M. S., and Foot, D. K. (1971). The Other Half of Gross Investment: Replacement and Modernization Expenditures, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53(1): 49-58.
  13. Fujita, M., and Thisse, J. F. (1996). Economics of Agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10(4): 339-378.
  14. Fujita, M., and Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of Agglomerati