Journals / Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology / 2020 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3

Perspectives of Young Otolaryngologists on Pediatric ENT and the Future of the Field in Turkey

Pages
163–168
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 71 participants (65.1%) were in training for residency and 38 (34.9%) were in their first year of expertise.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the current status and the future of pediatric otolaryngology in Turkey by evaluating the opinions of young otolaryngologists on pediatric otolaryngology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 224 otolaryngology physicians who were senior residents registered with the Turkish Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Association (TORL-HNS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 71 participants (65.1%) were in training for residency and 38 (34.9%) were in their first year of expertise.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the current status and the future of pediatric otolaryngology in Turkey by evaluating the opinions of young otolaryngologists on pediatric otolaryngology. Methods: The study included 224 otolaryngology physicians who were senior residents registered with the Turkish Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery Association (TORL-HNS). The physicians were in their last two years of otolaryngology training (154 physicians) or had completed their residency training and were in their first year of otolaryngology practice (70 physicians). They were approached via e-mail and Short Message Service (SMS) in October through December 2019 with a descriptive letter and asked to voluntarily complete an online questionnaire consisting of total 25 questions in five sections. Results: The online questionnaire was sent to 224 physicians, and 109 (49%) participated in the survey. All 109 participants answered all the questions. Overall, 71 participants (65.1%) were in training for residency and 38 (34.9%) were in their first year of expertise. According to their professional interests, the participants listed rhinology (45 participants, 41.3%), head and neck surgery (27 participants, 24.8%), facial plastic surgery (19 participants, 17%), otology-neurotology (16 participants, 14.7%), and laryngology-phoniatry (2 participants, 1.8%) as their first preference for subspecialty. Pediatric otolaryngology was never a first choice among the participants, although four (3.7%) listed pediatric otolaryngology as their second preference. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to shed light on the current and future status of pediatric otolaryngology in Turkey. We believe the establishment of exclusive pediatric otolaryngology clinics under the umbrella of general ear, nose and throat (ENT) clinics and the foundation of officially approved fellowship programs would bring this subspecialty field to its deserved and desired level in our country.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURGUT, N. F., ÖZDEMİR, D., MEHEL, D. M., Akgül, G., ÖZGÜR, A., TURGUT, S. (2020). Perspectives of Young Otolaryngologists on Pediatric ENT and the Future of the Field in Turkey. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3, 163–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/368915

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Osman EZ, Aneeshkumar MK, Clarke RW. Paediatric otolaryngology services in the UK: a postal questionnaire survey of ENT consultants. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119: 259-63. [Crossref] 2. Preciado D, Tunkel D, Zalzal G. Pediatric otolaryngology in the United States: demographics, workforce perceptions, and current practices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 135: 8-13. [Crossref] 3. Cunningham MJ, Lin AC. Pediatric otolaryngology: the maturation of a pediatric surgical subspecialty. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 194-201. [Crossref] 4. Verwoerd C, Froehlich P, Gryczynska D, Katona G, Pitkaranta A, Blayney A. Pediatric otorhinolaryngology anno 2008: towards European standards for training? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 839-41. [Crossref] 5. Ruben RJ. Development of pediatric otolaryngology in North America. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 541-6. [Crossref] 6. Hoeve HLJ. Paediatric otorhinolaryngology in the Netherlands. Clin Otolaryngol 2005; 30: 98. [Crossref] 7. Kerscher K, Tabaee A, Ward R, Haddad Jr J, Grunstein E. The residency experience in pediatric otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 718-22. [Crossref] 8. Bell JR, Ruch-Ross H, Hotaling AJ. Practice patterns and projections for the US pediatric otolaryngology workforce. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142: 823-7. [Crossref] 9. Stoddard JJ, Cull WL, Jewett EAB, Brotherton SE, Mulvey HJ, Alden ER. Providing pediatric subspecialty care: a workforce analysis. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 1325-33. [Crossref] 10. Alberti PW. Pediatric ear, nose and throat services’ demands and resources: a global perspective. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 49: S1-9. [Crossref] 11. Miller RH. Otolaryngology residency and fellowship training. The resident’s perspective. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120: 1057-61. [Crossref] 12. Erdağ TK, Durmuşoğlu M, Özay H, Sönmez F, Doğan E. [Turkey’s place in Europe in respect of pediatric otorhinolaryngology publications in scope of Science Citation Index]. Kulak Burun Boğaz Ihtis Derg 2015; 25: 163-9. [Crossref] 13. Côté V, Kus LH, Zhang X, Richardson K, Nguyen LHP. Advanced airway management teaching in otolaryngology residency programs in Canada: a survey of residents. Ear Nose Throat J 2015; 94: 187-92