Journals / Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology / 2020 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Management of Far-Advanced Otosclerosis: Stapes Surgery or Cochlear Implant

Pages
35–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, all patientshad satisfactory face-to-face communication and 90%could use telephone.Conclusion: Bilateral stapedotomy and wearinghearing aid is an effective and cost-effective solutionfor restoring natural binaural hearing and requires nospecific training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this report is to share our experience and treatment outcomes with far-advancedotosclerosis (FAO) patients.Methods: Patients that underwent surgery from 2003through 2014 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Audiological results and the ability to communicate face to face and over telephonewere considered as the main outcome measures.Results: Six FAO patients benefited well from stapedotomy with an average of 5.9-decibel (dB) air-bonegap and 86% median speech discrimination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, all patientshad satisfactory face-to-face communication and 90%could use telephone.Conclusion: Bilateral stapedotomy and wearinghearing aid is an effective and cost-effective solutionfor restoring natural binaural hearing and requires nospecific training.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this report is to share our experience and treatment outcomes with far-advancedotosclerosis (FAO) patients.Methods: Patients that underwent surgery from 2003through 2014 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. Nineteen FAO patients were included in the study. Audiological results and the ability to communicate face to face and over telephonewere considered as the main outcome measures.Results: Six FAO patients benefited well from stapedotomy with an average of 5.9-decibel (dB) air-bonegap and 86% median speech discrimination. Cochlearimplantation (CI) was performed in 13 patients; twohad disease progression after stapedotomy, five hadfailed stapes surgeries elsewhere, and six preferred CIas primary treatment. Median speech discriminationscore of CI patients was 78.4%. Overall, all patientshad satisfactory face-to-face communication and 90%could use telephone.Conclusion: Bilateral stapedotomy and wearinghearing aid is an effective and cost-effective solutionfor restoring natural binaural hearing and requires nospecific training. Should stapedotomy fail, cochlearimplantation is always a successful back-up option.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAJİN, M. D., ERGUN, O., ÇINAR, B. Ç., SENNAROĞLU, L. (2020). Management of Far-Advanced Otosclerosis: Stapes Surgery or Cochlear Implant. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 35–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/368903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Ramsay HA, Linthicum FH. Mixed hearing loss in otosclerosis: indication for long-term follow-up. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 536-9
  2. House HP, Sheehy JL. Stapes surgery: selection of the patient. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1961; 70: 1062-8. [Crossref] 3. Berrettini S, Burdo S, Forli F, Ravecca F, Marcaccini M, Casani AP, et al. Far advanced otosclerosis: stapes surgery or cochlear implantation? J Otolaryngol 2004; 33: 165-71. [Crossref] 4. Kabbara B, Gauche C, Calmels MN, Lepage B, Escude B, Deguine O, et al. Decisive criteria between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation in patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36: e73-8. [Crossref] 5. Merkus P, van Loon MC, Smit CF, Smits C, de Cock AF, Hensen EF. Decision making in advanced otosclerosis: an evidence-based strategy. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 1935-41. [Crossref] 6. Keith RW, Kereiakes TJ, Willging JP, Devine J. Evaluation of cochlear function in a patient with "far-advanced" otosclerosis. Am J Otol 1992; 13: 347-9
  3. Verhaert N, Borgers C, De Voecht K, Boon E, Desloovere C. A role for acoustic stimulation in advanced otosclerosis: Direct acoustic cochlear implant versus cochlear implant. Audiol Neurootol 2018; 23: 89-97. [Crossref] 8. Chang CJ, Wen YH, Sun CH, Beltrame MA, Wu HP. Treatment of moderate-to-severe otosclerosis with simultaneous piston surgery and incus vibroplasty. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 31: 96-101. [Crossref] 9. Marshall AH, Fanning N, Symons S, Shipp D, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM. Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 1728-33. [Crossref] 10. Munoz-Fernandez N, Morant-Ventura A, Achiques MT, Dualde-Beltran D, Garcia-Callejo FJ, Monrroy-Parada MV, et al. Evolution of otosclerosis to cochlear implantation. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2012; 63: 265-71. [Crossref] 11. Roland PS, Roth L. Interinterpreter variability in determining the SP/AP ratio in clinical electrocochleography. Laryngoscope 1997; 107: 1357-61. [Crossref] 12. Van Loon M, Merkus P, Smit C, Smits C, Witte B, Hensen E. Stapedotomy in cochlear implant candidates with far advanced otosclerosis: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2014; 35: 1707-14. [Crossref] 13. Calmels MN, Viana C, Wanna G, Marx M, James C, Deguine O, et al. Very far-advanced otosclerosis: stapedotomy or cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127: 574-8. [Crossref] 14. Sainz M, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Ballesteros JM. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otoscler