Journals / The European Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5

Mesenteric panniculitis: can venous anatomy and malignancy be a trigger cause?

Pages
509–514
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Study results show that MP is not associated with PV, SMV and PMA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To investigate whether portal vein (PV), splenic vein (SV), superior mesenteric vein (SMV) diameters and portomesenteric angle (PMA) may play a role in the etiology of mesenteric panniculitis (MP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We included 70 patients with MP and 70 patients age, gender, sagittal abdominal diameter randomly matched control group, retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Study results show that MP is not associated with PV, SMV and PMA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mesenteric panniculitis · Computed tomography · Portomesenteric angle

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether portal vein (PV), splenic vein (SV), superior mesenteric vein (SMV) diameters and portomesenteric angle (PMA) may play a role in the etiology of mesenteric panniculitis (MP). To investigate relationship between MP and malignancy. Methods: We included 70 patients with MP and 70 patients age, gender, sagittal abdominal diameter randomly matched control group, retrospectively. Results: We found slightly higher PV and SMV diameter and slightly lower SV diameter in MP patients compared with control group. But these results were not statistically significant (p1 = 0.321 and p2 = 0.147, p1 = 0.540 and p2 = 0.185, p1= 0.216 and p2 = 0.617, for two observers respectively). We found higher PMA in MP patients compared with control group but this difference is not statistically significant (p1 = 0.252 and p2 = 0.366, for two observers). Twenty three (32.9%) of 70 patients diagnosed MP have underlying malignancy while 17 (24.3%) of 70 control subject were coexisted malignancy. But this difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.262). Interobserver agreement was excellent in terms of SMV and SV diameters and PMA measurements (ICC were 0.927, 0.911 and 0.965 respectively), good for PV diameters (ICC was 0.884). Conclusions: Study results show that MP is not associated with PV, SMV and PMA. Contrary to some studies, there is no relationship between MP and malignancy.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLTEKİN, M. A. (2021). Mesenteric panniculitis: can venous anatomy and malignancy be a trigger cause?. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5, 509–514. https://ajindex.com/articles/368597

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Daskalogiannaki M, Voloudaki A, Prassopoulos P, Magkanas E, Stefanaki K, Apostolaki E et al. CT evaluation of mesenteric panniculitis: prevalence and associated diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:427-31
  2. Sharma P, Yadav S, Needham CM, Feuerstadt P. Sclerosing mesenteritis: a systematic review of 192 cases. Clin J Gastroenterol 2000;10:103-111
  3. Seo BK, Ha HK, Kim AY, Kim TK, Kim MJ, Byun JH et al. Segmental misty mesentery: Analysis of CT features and primary causes. Radiology 2003;226:86-94
  4. Sahin A, Artas H, Eroglu Y, Tunc N, Demirel U, Bahcecioglu IH et al. An overlooked potentially treatable disorder: idiopathic mesenteric panniculitis. Med Princ Pract 2017;26:567-72
  5. Kipfer RE, Moertel CG, Dahlin DC. Mesenteric lipodystrophy. Ann Intern Med 1974;80:582-8
  6. Gögebakan Ö, Albrecht T, Osterhoff MA, Reimann A. Is mesenteric panniculitis truely a paraneoplastic phenomenon? A matched pair analysis. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1853-9
  7. Protin-Catteau L, Thiefin G, Barbe C, Jolly D, Soyer P, Hoeffel C. Mesenteric panniculitis: review of consecutive abdominal MDCT examinations with a matched-pair analysis. Acta Radiol 2016;57:1438-44
  8. Coulier B. Mesenteric panniculitis. Part 2: prevalence and natural course: MDCTprospective study. JBR-BTR 2011;94:241-6
  9. Canyigit M, Koksal A, Akgoz A, Kara T, Sarisahin M, Akhan O. Multidetector-row computed tomography findings of sclerosing mesenteritis with associateddiseases and its prevalence. Jpn J Radiol 2011;29:495-502
  10. Nakatani K, Nakamoto Y, Togashi K. FDG-PET/CT assessment of misty mesentery: feasibility for distinguishing viable mesenteric malignancy from stable conditions. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e380-5
  11. Halligan S, Plumb A, Taylor S. Mesenteric panniculitis: systematic review of crosssectional imaging findings and risk of subsequent malignancy. Eur Radiol 2016;26:4531-7
  12. Soumerai S, Kirkland WG, McDonnell WV, Schanz A. Nodular mesenteritis: report of a case simulating carcinoma of the sigmoid colon and analysis of its histologic profile. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:448-52
  13. Pemberton J, Comfort MW, Fair E, Zaslow B. Intestinal lipodystrophy (Whipple’s disease). Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947;85:85-91.