Journals / Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

A Proposal of the STEM Education for Teacher Training: Design Based Science Education

FeTeMM Eğitim Yaklaşımının Öğretmen Eğitiminde Uygulanmasına Yönelik Bir Öneri: Tasarım Temelli Fen Eğitimi

Pages
212–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the research, it is found that pre-service science teachers assess the most powerful dimensions of this process as; it enhances the learning by doing , the goal of major design task is motivating, it leads permanent learning, and it is based on questioning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study primarily aims to investigate the pre-service science teachers' assessment on Design Based Science Education process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group is determined according to the intentional sample selection method which constitutes of 6 pre-service science teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the research, it is found that pre-service science teachers assess the most powerful dimensions of this process as; it enhances the learning by doing , the goal of major design task is motivating, it leads permanent learning, and it is based on questioning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study primarily aims to investigate the pre-service science teachers' assessment on Design Based Science Education process. Thus, in order to reflect the Approach of the STEM education in science class Design Based Science Education implementation is conducted for pre-service science teachers. The "single embedded case study design" which is one of the case study patterns, used in this research. The study group is determined according to the intentional sample selection method which constitutes of 6 pre-service science teachers. The research data which were collected in the middle and at the end of the design based learning process, were carried out twice with the semi-structured interviews. Content analysis, descriptive analysis and, constant comparative analysis were performed together for data analysis. In the research, it is found that pre-service science teachers assess the most powerful dimensions of this process as; it enhances the learning by doing , the goal of major design task is motivating, it leads permanent learning, and it is based on questioning.

Özet

Bu araştırmada FeTeMM eğitim yaklaşımını fen sınıflarına yansıtabilmek amacıyla önerilen Tasarım Temelli Fen Eğitimi ile planlanan bir sürecin hizmet öncesi fen öğretmenlerinin eğitiminde uygulanması ve öğretmen adaylarının sürece yönelik değerlendirmelerinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Durum çalışması desenindeki araştırmanın çalışma grubunu amaçlı örneklem seçme yöntemi ile belirlenen 6 fen bilimleri öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Tasarım temelli fen eğitimi uygulamalarının ortasında ve sonunda olmak üzere iki kez gerçekleştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile toplanan veriler, içerik analizi, betimsel analiz ve sürekli karşılaştırmalı analiz teknikleri bir arada kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının mühendislik tasarım sürecinin en güçlü yönlerini yaparak öğrenmeyi sağlaması, büyük tasarım görevi hedefinin motive edici olması, kalıcı öğrenmeyi sağlaması ve sorgulamaya dayalı olması gibi özellikleriyle değerlendirdikleri tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAN, E. B., YAMAK, H., KIRIKKAYA, E. B. (2016). A Proposal of the STEM Education for Teacher Training: Design Based Science Education. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 212–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/368564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.
  2. Ayas, A. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde laboratuvar kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. 10 Ekim 2013 tarihinde http://w2.anadolu.edu.tr/aos/kitap/IOLTP/2283/unite07.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. Barnett, M. Connolly, K. G., Jarvin, L., Marulcu, I. Rogers, C., Wendell, K. B., & Wright, C. G. (2008). Science through http://www.legoengineering.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/05/LEcom_Compiled_Packet_Machines_LowRes. pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir. design a people mover: simple machines. Bozkurt, O., Orhan, A. T. & Ay, Y. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji laboratuvar uygulamaları I-II. Ankara:
  3. Eğiten Kitap. Bozkurt, E., Yamak, H., Buluş Kırıkkaya, E., & Kavak, N. (2013). Engineering design applications in pre-service science teacher training. The International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE) Eurasian Regional Symposium & Brokerage Event Horizon 2020,
  4. Antalya, Turkey. Brophy,S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
  5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  6. Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20-46).
  7. Wasington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301-309.
  8. Capobianco, B. M. (2011). Exploring a science teacher's uncertainty with integrating engineering design: an action research study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 645-660.
  9. Capobianco, B. M. (2013). Learning and teaching science through engineering design: insights and implications for professional development. Association for Science Teacher Education, Charleston, SC. Cotton, S. E. (2002). Making problem-solving simulations more realistic. The Technology Teacher, 62(3), 29-32.
  10. Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrai