Journals / Turkish Journal of Cancer / 2000 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Basal cell carcinoma and demodicidosis: Is there an etiologic or coincidental relationship?

Pages
111–118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another explanation for these results would be that an age-related decline in immunity may be responsible for the increased mite positivity and mite numbers in BCC cases, or these findings may indicate only a coincidental relationship between demodicosis and BCC, but not an etiologic one.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although solar irradiation is the major factor in the development of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), some other factors also seem to play an etiopathogenetic role regarding the fact that relatively sun-protected areas are also often involved.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated a total of 142 histopathologic skin specimens which include at least 5 pilosebaceous units, taken from 94 cases with BCC and from 48 healthy subjects with benign skin lesions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another explanation for these results would be that an age-related decline in immunity may be responsible for the increased mite positivity and mite numbers in BCC cases, or these findings may indicate only a coincidental relationship between demodicosis and BCC, but not an etiologic one.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deri hastalıkları · Karsinom · bazal hücreli

Abstract

Although solar irradiation is the major factor in the development of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), some other factors also seem to play an etiopathogenetic role regarding the fact that relatively sun-protected areas are also often involved. Pilosebaceous follicle mites, Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis are found most frequently and densely in the same facial areas including eyelids, forehead, nasal and periauricular regions where basal cell carcinomas also appear more commonly than elsewhere. We therefore investigated whether there is an etiopathogenetic relationship between demodicidosis and BCC. We evaluated a total of 142 histopathologic skin specimens which include at least 5 pilosebaceous units, taken from 94 cases with BCC and from 48 healthy subjects with benign skin lesions. The demodicidosis rate and mean demodex number were found significantly higher in BCC cases (44.68%, and 0.872±1.193, respectively) than those in controls (25%, and 0.458±1.009, respectively) (p<0.05). Mite frequency was significantly higher in the periorbitally located BCCs as compared to other locations (p<0.05), while it did not differ significantly among the histologic subtypes of BCC (p>0.05). Conclusively, demodicidosis can be one of the predisposing factors which contribute to the carcinogenesis process of BCC, by causing perifollicular chronic inflammation or by its traumatic effect. Another explanation for these results would be that an age-related decline in immunity may be responsible for the increased mite positivity and mite numbers in BCC cases, or these findings may indicate only a coincidental relationship between demodicosis and BCC, but not an etiologic one.

Özet

Although solar irradiation is the major factor in the development of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), some other factors also seem to play an etiopathogenetic role regarding the fact that relatively sun-protected areas are also often involved. Pilosebaceous follicle mites, Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis are found most frequently and densely in the same facial areas including eyelids, forehead, nasal and periauricular regions where basal cell carcinomas also appear more commonly than elsewhere. We therefore investigated whether there is an etiopathogenetic relationship between demodicidosis and BCC. We evaluated a total of 142 histopathologic skin specimens which include at least 5 pilosebaceous units, taken from 94 cases with BCC and from 48 healthy subjects with benign skin lesions. The demodicidosis rate and mean demodex number were found significantly higher in BCC cases (44.68%, and 0.872±1.193, respectively) than those in controls (25%, and 0.458±1.009, respectively) (p<0.05). Mite frequency was significantly higher in the periorbitally located BCCs as compared to other locations (p<0.05), while it did not differ significantly among the histologic subtypes of BCC (p>0.05). Conclusively, demodicidosis can be one of the predisposing factors which contribute to the carcinogenesis process of BCC, by causing perifollicular chronic inflammation or by its traumatic effect. Another explanation for these results would be that an age-related decline in immunity may be responsible for the increased mite positivity and mite numbers in BCC cases, or these findings may indicate only a coincidental relationship between demodicosis and BCC, but not an etiologic one.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBAĞCI, Z., ERKILIÇ, S. (2000). Basal cell carcinoma and demodicidosis: Is there an etiologic or coincidental relationship?. Turkish Journal of Cancer, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 111–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/368513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Miller SJ. Biology of basal cell carcinoma (Part I). J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:1-13
  2. Patterson JW. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Demis DJ, editor. Clinical Dermatology: 19th rev. ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1992;Unit 21- 18:1-26
  3. Friedman RJ, Darrell SR, Kopf AW, et al. In: Cancer of the skin. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1991: 35-70
  4. Miller SJ. Biology of basal cell carcinoma (Part II). J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:161-75
  5. Noodleman FR, Pollack SV. Trauma as a possible etiologic factor in basal cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1986;12:841-6
  6. Erbağcı Z, Özgöztaşı O. The significance of Demodex folliculorum density in rosacea. Int J Dermatol 1998;37:421-5
  7. English FP, Nutting WB. Demodicidosis of ophthalmic concern. Am J Ophtalmol 1981;91:362-72
  8. Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC. The demodex mite population in rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28:443-8
  9. Forton F, Seys B, Marchal JL, et al. Demodex folliculorum and topical treatment: acaricidal action evaluated by standardised skin surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:456-60
  10. Barrio J, Lecona M, Hernanz JM, et al. Rosacea-like demodicidosis in an HIVpositive child. Dermatology 1996;192:143-5
  11. Zackheim HS. Origin of the human basal cell epithelioma. J Invest Dermatol 1963;40:283-97
  12. Hogan DJ, To T, Gran L, et al. Risk factors for basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 1989;28:591-4
  13. Özyazgan I, Kontacs O. Basal cell carcinoma arising from surgical scars: a case and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 1999;25:965-8
  14. Wilkin JK, Strobel D. Basal cell carcinoma arising at the site of venipuncture. Cutis 1985;36:297-8
  15. Roth AM. Demodex folliculorum in hair follicles of eyelid skin. Ann Ophtalmol 1979;11:37-40
  16. Sengbusch HG, Hauswirth JW. Prevalence of hair follicle mites, Demodex folliculorum and D. brevis (Acari: Demodicidae) in a selected human population in western New York, USA. J Med Entomol 1986;23:384-8
  17. Forton F. Demodex et inflammation périfolliculaire chez l’homme: revue et obsevation de 69 biopsies. Ann Dematol Vénéréol 1986;113:1047-58
  18. Hellerich U, Metzelder M. Incidence of scalp involvement by Demodex folliculorum Simon ectoparasites in a pathologic-anatomic and forensic medicine autopsy sample. Arch Kriminol 1994;194:111-8
  19. Wikel SK. Immunomodulation of host responses to ectoparasite infestation: an overview. Vet Parasitol 1984;14:321-39
  20. Wikel SK, Ramachandra RN, Bergman DK. Tick-induced modulation of the hos