Journals / Turkish Journal of Cancer / 2001 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Detection of metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes of primary breast cancer patients by lymphatic mapping and intraoperative gamma probe: Initial experience

Pages
27–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If our future results accumulate to give the same success rate with no or very infrequent false evaluations, we might then proceed to targeting only the SLN as a reliable predictor of the axillary LN status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study documents our initial experience for visualisation of sentine! lymph nodes (SLNs) with lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection of SLN with the handheld gamma probe in patients with primary breast cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fourteen women with palpable breast cancer had peritumoral injection of 99mTc labeled nanocolloid in four different regions. 1mCi of 99mTc labeled nanocolloid in 0.8 mi saline were divided into four equal portions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If our future results accumulate to give the same success rate with no or very infrequent false evaluations, we might then proceed to targeting only the SLN as a reliable predictor of the axillary LN status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öncül lenf düğümü biyopsisi · Meme neoplazmları · Lenf düğümleri

Abstract

This study documents our initial experience for visualisation of sentine! lymph nodes (SLNs) with lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection of SLN with the handheld gamma probe in patients with primary breast cancer. Fourteen women with palpable breast cancer had peritumoral injection of 99mTc labeled nanocolloid in four different regions. 1mCi of 99mTc labeled nanocolloid in 0.8 mi saline were divided into four equal portions. Thirty minutes' dynamic images and static images, every 30 minutes for 3 hours, were obtained. After intraoperative identification and resection of the SLN(s), all the patients underwent full axillary dissection. We were able to visualise and localise the SLN(s) in all patients. An average of 30.1 lymph nodes (range 19-44) were harvested. Metastatic involvement of the axillary nodes was found in only 4 of the 14 patients in this series (28.6%). in one of these 4 patients with axillary involvement, the sentine! lymph node was the only involved node. in the other three patients, metastases were also found in lymph nodes other than the SLN. Our initial experience is promising that SLNs can be accurately localised with our technique of combination lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe. The SLN was predictive of the presence or absence of LN metastasis in all patients. If our future results accumulate to give the same success rate with no or very infrequent false evaluations, we might then proceed to targeting only the SLN as a reliable predictor of the axillary LN status.

Özet

Detection of metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes of primary breast cancer patients by lymphatic mapping and intraoperative gamma probe: Initial experience

🔖

Cite This Article

KİTAPÇI, M. T., MENTEŞ, B. B., ÜNER, A., ABAMOR, E., DURSUN, A., KAPLAN, M., FERAHKÖŞE, Z., TATLICIOĞLU, E. (2001). Detection of metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes of primary breast cancer patients by lymphatic mapping and intraoperative gamma probe: Initial experience. Turkish Journal of Cancer, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 27–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/368380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Moore CH. On the influence of inadequate operations on the theory of cancer. R Chir Soc 1867;1:244-8
  2. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. NIH Consensus Conference. JAMA 1991;265:391-5
  3. Coates A. Management of early breast cancer: An Australian Consensus Report. Oncology 1995;52:82-5
  4. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumour size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989;63:181-7
  5. Fisher B, Bauer M, Wickerham DL, et al. Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer: An NSABP update. Cancer 1983;52:1551-7
  6. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Bauer M, et al. The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histological nodal status in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:765-72
  7. Consensus Conference. Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA 1985;254:3461-63
  8. Rosen PP, Groshen S, Saigo PE, et al. A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:355-366
  9. Wilson RE, Donegan WL, Mettlin C, et al. The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1984;159:309-18
  10. Hellman S. Natural history of small breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2229- 2234
  11. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Treatment of early stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;11:1-5
  12. Kiricuta CI, Tausch J. A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement based on 1446 complete axillary dissections in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992;69:2496-501
  13. Axelsson CK, Mouridsen HT, Zedeler K. Axillary dissection for level I and II lymph nodes is important in breast cancer classification. The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:1415-8
  14. Baxter N, McCready DR, Chapman JA, et al. Clinical behaviour of untreated axillary nodes after local treatment for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:235-40
  15. Graversen HP, Blichert-Toft M, Andersen J, Zedeler K and the Danish Breast Cancer Co-operative Group. Breast cancer: risk of axillary recurrence in nodenegative patients following partial dissection of the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 1988;14:407-12
  16. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L. Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer. Can J Surg 1993;36:315-20
  17. Beatty JD, Robinson