Journals / Turkish Journal of Cancer / 2002 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

The prognostic predictors for disease free survival and overail survival in stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant cyclophospamide-adriamycin-5-fluorouracil (CAF) chemotherapy

Pages
92–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In univariate analyses statistically significant predictors for DFS were age, nodal status, multicentricity and receptor status; and for overall survival (OS) were nodal status and receptor status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Anthracycline-containing regimens today are considered as the standard chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival, prognostic factors and side effects of adjuvant cyclophosphamide-adriamycin-5-fluorouracil (CAF) chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In univariate analyses statistically significant predictors for DFS were age, nodal status, multicentricity and receptor status; and for overall survival (OS) were nodal status and receptor status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Meme neoplazmları · Seyir · Neoplazm evrelendirilmesi

Abstract

Anthracycline-containing regimens today are considered as the standard chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival, prognostic factors and side effects of adjuvant cyclophosphamide-adriamycin-5-fluorouracil (CAF) chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Between 1987 and 2000, 248 breast cancer patients were treated with CAF chemotherapy. The mean age of the patients were 44.6 years (range: 21 -75). The majority of the patients were premenopausal (71%). Estrogen receptor positivity was 48% in 151 patients. Progesterone receptor positivity was 47% in 130 patients. According to TNM classification 3.6%, 59.3% and 34.7% of the patients were at stage I, Il and III, respectively. During the median follow-up time of 24.1 months (range: 4.8-156.2), the median disease free survival (DFS) was 63.1 months. In univariate analyses statistically significant predictors for DFS were age, nodal status, multicentricity and receptor status; and for overall survival (OS) were nodal status and receptor status. In multivariate analyses, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was the most significant independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. While the age was another independent factor for DFS, the receptor status was an independent prognostic factor for OS. The most frequent side effects were fatigue (92%), grade 3 alopecia (84.7%) and grade 3 nausea/vomitting (65.3%). The number of the metastatic lymph nodes, especially when more than 3, revealed to be the most significant prognostic factor in patients treated with CAF. CAF is a well-tolerated combination with few side effects.

🔖

Cite This Article

OYAN, B., GÜLER, N., KARS, A., TÜRKER, A., ALTUNDAĞ, K., ÖZIŞIK, Y., BALTALI, E., ÇELİK, İ., BARIŞTA, İ., GÜLLÜ, İ., YALÇIN, Ş., HAMALOĞLU, E., ÖNER, Z., TEKUZMAN, G. (2002). The prognostic predictors for disease free survival and overail survival in stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant cyclophospamide-adriamycin-5-fluorouracil (CAF) chemotherapy. Turkish Journal of Cancer, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 92–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/368377

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Fırat D, Çelik İ. Cancer statistics in Turkey and in the world (1993-1995). Ankara, Turkish Association for Cancer Research and Control, 1998
  2. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden. Int J Cancer 1993,55:891-903
  3. Abraham J, Zujewski JA. Breast Cancer. In: Abraham J, Allegra CJ, editors. Bethesda Handbook of Clinical Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2001;127-41
  4. Seidman H, Mushinski M, Gelb S. Probability of eventually developing or dying of cancer, United States. CA 1985;35:36-8
  5. Sainsburry JRC, Anderson TJ, ^Morgan DAL. Breast cancer. BMJ 2000;321745-50. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, et al. Meeting highlights: international consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3817-27. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;352:930-42. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers, 1998. National Cancer Institute. Common toxicity criteria manual. http.//ncictep.cancer.gov. 1999:1-31. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc A 1972;135:185-206. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972;34:187- 220. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley, 1989. 14 Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer 1977;40(Suppl 1): 574-87
  6. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Day NE, et al. Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insight from results of screening. Lancet 1992;339:412-4
  7. Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU. Current status of adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer: progress and controversy. CA Cancer J Clin 1995;45:196-226
  8. NIH Consensus Statements
  9. Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. http://consensus.nih.gov. 2000;17:1-23
  10. Hutchins L, Green S, Ravdin P, et al. CMF versus CAF with and without tamoxifen in high risk node-negative breast cancer patients and a natural history follow-up study in low-risk node-negative patients: First results of Intergroup trial INT 0102 [abstract]. Proc Am Clin On