Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2009 / Sayı: 116

The role of clientelism in Turkish politics

Birimiz hepimiz, hepimiz birimiz için mi? Dağınık bir siyasetin topluma sunduğu elde kalan tutkal: Klientalist ağlar

Pages
21–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the study is concluded with a sketch of the reaction of the clientelist structure to the domination of Turkish politics by Islamist groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to explore the role of clientelism in Turkish politics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The second emphasis of the essay is on the distributiori of materials and services after the transition to the multiparty regime in 1946.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the study is concluded with a sketch of the reaction of the clientelist structure to the domination of Turkish politics by Islamist groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the role of clientelism in Turkish politics. More specifically, it aims to explore how clientelism has served in the socialization of Turkish people by drawing from a diverse array of examples from Turkish political history. The paper starts out by arguing that the clientelist networks in Turkey have been shaped by traditional motives and thus initially helped the single party regime of the newly established Turkish Republic to connect with the masses through the brokerage of peripheral notables. The second emphasis of the essay is on the distributiori of materials and services after the transition to the multiparty regime in 1946. It is during this period that clientelism eased the tension between social groups and helped the periphery to become a part of the political arena; thus contributing to the political stability in Turkey. The study then examines the effect of the 1980 military coup and the following neoliberal economic policies on the existing and newly developing clientelist networks. Finally, the study is concluded with a sketch of the reaction of the clientelist structure to the domination of Turkish politics by Islamist groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOMŞUOĞLU, A. (2009). The role of clientelism in Turkish politics. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 116, 21–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/367198

References (23)

  1. Altan, Çetin (1979) Ben Milletvekili İken. Hürriyet Yayınları,
  2. İstanbul.
  3. Auyero, Javier (2000) Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Duke University Press,
  4. Durham, Londra. Aytaç, Ömer (2005) "Türkiye Kentleşmesinde Bir Ara Kurum: Kent Kahvehaneleri", Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, s. 179-200. Bayhan,Vehbi (2008) "Üniversite Gençliğinin Sosyolojik Profili 2008",
  5. İnönü Üniversitesi Uygulaması, Yayınlanmamış sonuç raporu. Bayhan,Vehbi(2001) "Üniversite Gençliğinin Sorunları ve Gelecek Tasarımı", Yedinci Ulusal Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara.
  6. Brown, Kenneth (1977) "Changing forms of patronage in a Moroccan city". Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies içinde (der. E. Gellner ve J. Waterbury), Duckworth, Londra, s.309-327.
  7. Cizre, Ümit (2002) "From Ruler to Pariah, The life and Times of True Path Party", Political Parties in Turkey içinde (der. Barry M. Rubin, Metin Heper), Routledge, s.82-101.
  8. Demirel, Süleyman (1967) "30 Ekim 1966 Tarihinde Kadın Kolları 1.Genel Kogresinde Yaptığı Konuşma", Konuşmalar. Adalet Partisi Genel Merkezi Yayınları,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Demirel, Süleyman (1967) "16 Kasım 1966 Tarihinde Gaziantep II Kongresinde Yaptığı Konuşma", Konuşmalar. Adalet Partisi Genel Merkezi Yayınları,
  11. Ankara.
  12. Eisenstadt, S.N. ve Roniger, L. (1980) "Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange", Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22 (1), s.43-78.
  13. Eisenstadt, S.N. ve Roniger, L. (1984)
  14. Patrons, Clients and Friends. Cambridge University Press,
  15. Cambridge. Fonchingong, C.C (2004) "The travails of democratization in Cameroun in the context of political liberalization since the 1990s", African and Asian Studies, 3, s.33-59.
  16. Gordin, Jorge P. (2002) "The political and partisan determinants of patronage in Latin America 1960-1995", A Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 41(4), s.513-549.
  17. Golden, M.A. (2003) "Electoral connections: the effects of the personal vote on political patronage, bureaucracy and legislation in postwar Italy", British Journal of Political Science, 33, s. 189-212.
  18. Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe (1990) "Kasabada politika ve politikacı". Toplum ve Bilim, 50, s.97-110.
  19. Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe (1992) CHP (Örgüt ve İdeoloji). Gündoğan Yayınları,
  20. Ankara.
  21. Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe (1993) "Siyasette Kollamacılık", Siyasal Ahlak ve Siyasal Ahlaksızlık içinde (der. Türker Alkan), Bilgi Yayınları,
  22. Ankara.
  23. Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe (1994a) "Clientelism: Premodern, modern, post