Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2009 / Sayı: 115

Security sector and construction of (in)security: Understanding a social paranoia

Güvenlik endüstrisi ve güven(siz)liğin inşası: Bir toplumsal paranoyayı anlamak

Pages
204–225
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reorganisation of the external military apparatus (private armies), internal policing (private security companies), and criminal justice system (private prisons) are then ana lysed as the instances in which the emerging relationship between security threats, security measures, and security sector is crystallized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article critically assesses the relationship among security threats, security measures, and security sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It argues that security became the organizing principle of the social and political life both at the global and domestic level, cross-cutting the private and public spheres.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reorganisation of the external military apparatus (private armies), internal policing (private security companies), and criminal justice system (private prisons) are then ana lysed as the instances in which the emerging relationship between security threats, security measures, and security sector is crystallized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article critically assesses the relationship among security threats, security measures, and security sector. It argues that security became the organizing principle of the social and political life both at the global and domestic level, cross-cutting the private and public spheres. The article shows that the relationship between security consciousness and security threats, both at the global and domestic level, are not direct. It argues that our contemporary obsession with security should be explained by focusing on the re-organization of the security sector, rather than focusing on the presence or absence of security threats. The re-organisation of the security sector is analyzed as a two dimensional phenomena; first a large-scale privatization of supposedly state supplied security services to private companies and second the emergence of new security spheres and commodities. The reorganisation of the external military apparatus (private armies), internal policing (private security companies), and criminal justice system (private prisons) are then ana lysed as the instances in which the emerging relationship between security threats, security measures, and security sector is crystallized.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALTA, E. P. (2009). Security sector and construction of (in)security: Understanding a social paranoia. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 115, 204–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/367197

References (11)

  1. Abrahamsen, Rita ve Michael C. Williams (2007) "Securing the City: Private Security Companies and Non-State Authority in Global Governance", International Relations, 21: 237. Amoore, Louise (2009) "Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror", Antipode, 41(1): 49-69.
  2. Andreas, Peter ve Richard Price (2001) "From War Fighting to Crime Fighting: Transforming the American National Security State", International Studies Review, 3(3): 31-52.
  3. Aradau, Claudia ve Rens Van Munster (2007) "Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future", European Journal of International Relations, 13(1): 89-115.
  4. Arnold, Guy (1999) Mercenaries: The Scourge of the Third World, Basingstoke: Macmillan. Atılgan, Mehmet (2007) "Güvenliğin Özel Tedariki", İstanbul, 59:52-56.
  5. Avant, Deborah (2005) The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University. Balta, Evren (2004) "Bildiğimiz Anlamda Devletin Sonu mu? İmparatorluk ve Özel Ordular", Biri-kim, 178: 11-19.
  6. Beck, Ulrich (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Londra: Sage. — (1999)
  7. World Risk Society, Cambridge: Polity. — (2002) "The Silence of Words and Political Dynamics in the World Risk Society", Logos, 1(4):1-18. — (2003) "The Silence of Words: On Terror and War", Security Dialogue, 34(3):255-267. — (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Londra: Sage. Bigo, Didier (2004) "Security and Civil Liberties in Europe and in the US: Do We Have a State of Exception" Montréal: Üniversite du Quebec, 'War, Sovereignty and Security Today" konferansında sunulan tebliğ, 15-16
  8. Mart. Bobbitt, P (2008) Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-First Century, New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Bobbitt, Philiph (2002) The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, New York: Knopf. Bora, Tanil (2001) "Özel Hapishane Önerileri: 'Yüz kişi daha içeri tıkıldı. Bereket Zindancılık A.Ş. hisseleri değer kazandı'", Radikal İki, 14 Ocak 2001. — (2004b) "Özel Güvenlik ve 'Polis Toplumu'", Birikim, sayı:178. — (2007) "Garibana 'Emniyet', Kibar Muhitlere 'Özel Güvenlik'", İstanbul, sayı: 59: 58-61.
  9. Brayton, Steven (2002) "Outsourcing War: Mercenaries and the Privatization of Peacekeeping",Journal of International Affairs, 55(2):303-330.
  10. Bubandt, Nils (2005) "Vernacular Security: The Politics of Feeling Safe in Global, National and Local Worlds", Security Dialogue, 36(3): 275-296.
  11. Bush, George W. (2006) President Bush Adresses the Nation in Atlanta http://ww