Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2009 / Sayı: 116

Violence as a "dividing" and as a "unifying" factor

Bir "bölücü" ve "birleştirici" olarak şiddet

Pages
6–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The acquisition of such a status, however, requires, the capacity of using violence and legitimizing it by means of a discourse based on enmity, and restraining, at the same time, its impact on the represented groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Through a series of research hypotheses, this article proposes that for many decades the society in Turkey has been, at once, a producer and container of high-scale violence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Political, ethnic and linguistic violence does not only lead to divisions in the society; but it also offers to different strata of the society the possibility to imagine themselves in different camps with their specific sacralized symbols (historical narratives, cult of martyrs, flags...) and give birth to new, although fragmented, power structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The acquisition of such a status, however, requires, the capacity of using violence and legitimizing it by means of a discourse based on enmity, and restraining, at the same time, its impact on the represented groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Through a series of research hypotheses, this article proposes that for many decades the society in Turkey has been, at once, a producer and container of high-scale violence. Political, ethnic and linguistic violence does not only lead to divisions in the society; but it also offers to different strata of the society the possibility to imagine themselves in different camps with their specific sacralized symbols (historical narratives, cult of martyrs, flags...) and give birth to new, although fragmented, power structures. Throughout this process, some actors become "referential actors" for some segments of the society. The acquisition of such a status, however, requires, the capacity of using violence and legitimizing it by means of a discourse based on enmity, and restraining, at the same time, its impact on the represented groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZARSLAN, H. (2009). Violence as a "dividing" and as a "unifying" factor. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 116, 6–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/366979

References (20)

  1. Baudrillard, Jean (2002)
  2. L'esprit du terrorisme, Paris, Galilee. Belge, Murat (1983)
  3. Tarihten Güncelliğe, İstanbul,
  4. Alan Yayıncılık. Ben Elizer, Uri (2003) "Tsahal et l'lntifada al-Aqsa: une armee post-moderne dans une guerre post-moderne" Alain Dieckhoff ve Remy Leveau (der.), Israeliens et Palestiniens. La Guerre en partage içinde, Paris, Balland, s. 55-88. Benslama Fathi ve Nadia Tazi (der.) (2004)
  5. La virilite en Islam, La Tour d'Aigues, L'Aube. Bozarslan, Hamit (1999) "Le phenomene milicien: une composante de la violence politique en Turquie des annees 70", Turcica, no. 31, s. 185-244.
  6. Bozarslan, Hamit(2009) "İktidar Yapıları, Zor ve Şiddet", Semih Vaner (der.), 21. Yüzyıla Girerken Türkiye içinde, İstanbul, Kitap Yayınevi, 2009, s. 222-245.
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre (1992)
  8. Reponses, Paris, Seuil. Braud, Philippe (1999) "Violence symbolique, violence physique. Elements de problematisation", Jean Hannoyer (dir.), Guerres civiles. Economies de la violence, dimensions de la civilite içinde, Paris, Karthala. Cizre, Ümit (1999)
  9. Muktedirlerin Siyaseti, İstanbul,
  10. İletişim. Elwert, George, S. Feuchtwang ve D. Neubert (der.) (1999) Dynamics of Violence. Processes of Escalation and De-Escalation in Violent Conflicts, Berlin, Duncker. Eppler, Erhard (2002) Vom Gewaltmonopol zum Gewaltmarkt?, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp. Ergil, Doğu (1980)
  11. Türkiye'de Terör ve Şiddet, Ankara,
  12. Turhan Kitabevi.
  13. Erikson, Erik H. (1990) Adolescence et Crise. La quete de l'identite, Paris, Flammarion. Feyerabend, Paul (1979) Contre la methode. Esquisse d'une theor'ıe anarchiste de la connaissance, Paris, Seuil. Gökalp, Altan (tarihsiz) Prix de la tradition: les menages turcs et les prestations matrimoniales, Paris/Nanterre, CNRS. Laçiner, Ömer (1979), "Türkiye'de. Maraş'tan Sonra", Birikim, n°46-47.
  14. Lüküslü, Demet (2009) Türkiye'de 'Gençlik Miti' ve 1980
  15. Sonrası Türkiye Gençliği, İstanbul,
  16. İletişim. Mardin, Şerif (1991) "Türkiye'de Gençlik ve Şiddet", Ş. Mardin, Türk Modernleşmesi, Makaleler 4 içinde, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, s. 251-290.
  17. Mardin, Şerif (1992) Bediüzzaman Said Nursi Olayı: Modern Türkiye'de Din ve Toplumsal Değişim, İstanbul,
  18. İletişim. Massicard, Elise (2008) "L'islamisme turc a l'epreuve du pouvoir municipal: production d'espaces, pratique de gouvernement et gestion des societes locales", Critique 'Internationale, no. 42, s. 21-38.
  19. Pecaut, Daniel (1994) "Violence et politique: quatre elements de reflexion â propos de la Colombie", Cultures et Conflits, no. 13-14.
  20. Rule, James B. (1