SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2009 / Sayı: 116

Notes on China Miéville's Between equal rights: A Marxist theory of international Law

China Miéville'in between equal rights: A marxist theory of international law adlı çalışması üzerine notlar

ALİ MURAT ÖZDEMİR
Pages
243–261
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Following China Mieville's attempt to employ political economy to make better sense of the functions of international law-in the world capitalist system, this article also aims to explore the possible contributions of the Marxist literature on international law to the book.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article discusses and examines the potentials offered by China Mieville's book for the theory of international law in general and for the Marxist approaches to law in particular.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mieville's book critically examines existing theories of international law and provides the reader a starting point to develop an alternative Marxist approach on the basis of commodity form theory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Following China Mieville's attempt to employ political economy to make better sense of the functions of international law-in the world capitalist system, this article also aims to explore the possible contributions of the Marxist literature on international law to the book.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article discusses and examines the potentials offered by China Mieville's book for the theory of international law in general and for the Marxist approaches to law in particular. Mieville's book critically examines existing theories of international law and provides the reader a starting point to develop an alternative Marxist approach on the basis of commodity form theory. While Mieville satisfactorily illuminates the reader on various deficiencies of bourgeois international law theory, his attempt falls into the same traps Pashukanis did before. Following China Mieville's attempt to employ political economy to make better sense of the functions of international law-in the world capitalist system, this article also aims to explore the possible contributions of the Marxist literature on international law to the book.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A. M. (2009). Notes on China Miéville's Between equal rights: A Marxist theory of international Law. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 116, 243–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/366976

References (27)

  1. Angie, A: (2005)
  2. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Arthur, C. (1983) Introduction to Y. Pashukanis Law and Marxism: A General Theory Towards a Critique of the Fundamental Concepts, Londra, Pluto Press.
  4. Arthur, C. (1984)
  5. The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital, Leiden, Brill Academic Publishers.
  6. Baxi, U. (1993)
  7. Marx, Law and Justice, Bombay, Indian Perspectives. Bowring, B. (2008) The Degradation of the International Legal Order?: The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics, Oxon, Routledge. Callinicos, A. (2003)
  8. New Mandarins of American Power, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  9. Carty, A. (2007)
  10. Philosophy of International Law, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
  11. Chimni, B.S. (1999) "Marxism and International Law: A Contemporary Analysis" Economic and Political Weekly, Şubat, 337-349.
  12. Chimni, B. S. (1993) International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches, Londra, Sage Publications. Cutler, C. (2001) "Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organisation: A Crisis of Legitimacy", Review of International Studies, 27 (2) 133-150.
  13. Evans, T. (1996) US Hegemony and the Project of Universal Human Rights, Londra, Macmillan Press.
  14. Fine, B. (1986) Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liberal Ideas and Marxist Critiques, Londra, Pluto Press.
  15. Fritzpatrick, P (2001)
  16. Modernism and the Grounds of Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  17. Gill, S. (2003) Power and Resistance in the New World Order, New York, Palgrave. Hardt, M. ve Negri, A. (2001) İmparatorluk (çev. Abdullah Yılmaz), Istanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  18. Hardt, M. ve Negri, A. (2004) Çokluk (çev. Barış Yıldırım), İstanbul,
  19. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  20. Hunt, A. (1993) Explorations in Law and Society: Towards a Constitutive Theory of Law, Londra ve New York, Routledge. Keach, W. (2003) International Law: illusion and Reality, International Socialist Review, 27 http:// www.isreview.org/issues/27/international_law.shtml Koskenniemi, M. (2005)
  21. From Apology to Utopia, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  22. Marx, K. (1992) Kapital İkinci Cilt (çev. Alaattin Bilgi), Ankara,
  23. Sol Yayınları.
  24. Marx, K. (1990) Kapital Üçüncü Cilt (çev. Alaattin Bilgi), Ankara,
  25. Sol Yayınları.
  26. Mieville, C. (2005) Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law, Boston, Historical Materialism. Milovanoviç, D. (2003) An Introduction to the Sociology of Law, New York, Criminal Justice Press.
  27. Özdemir, A.M. (2008) Sözün Mülki