Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2010 / Sayı: 119

Ladas, Pentzopoulos and the Turco-Greek Exchange of Populations: An analysis of a metanarrative

Ladas, Pentzopoulos ve Türk-Yunan Nüfus Mübadelesi: Bir üst-anlatının anlatısı

Pages
184–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of the recent critical scholarship, it shows that the meta-narrative of the Exchange is unfounded in terms of its facts, assumptions and conclusions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Turco-Greek Exchange of Populations agreed at Lausanne (1923) was a worldhistorical event as it marked the first forceful removal of minorities under the auspices of an international organization (League of Nations).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the occurrence of the event, this success paradigm has been incorporated into the academic discourse and political rhetoric and publicly acclaimed especially in the 1930s and 1990s when ethnic nationalism was at its heyday.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of the recent critical scholarship, it shows that the meta-narrative of the Exchange is unfounded in terms of its facts, assumptions and conclusions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Turco-Greek Exchange of Populations agreed at Lausanne (1923) was a worldhistorical event as it marked the first forceful removal of minorities under the auspices of an international organization (League of Nations). Despite the predicaments and suffering it inflicted upon the people, the Exchange was attributed a success story for having resolved inter-state conflict and consolidating the nationstate by providing its ethnic-religious homogenization. Since the occurrence of the event, this success paradigm has been incorporated into the academic discourse and political rhetoric and publicly acclaimed especially in the 1930s and 1990s when ethnic nationalism was at its heyday. The present study examines two major texts that fabricated the meta-narrative of the Exchange as a successful undertaking. In light of the recent critical scholarship, it shows that the meta-narrative of the Exchange is unfounded in terms of its facts, assumptions and conclusions.

Özet

1923te Lozanda karara bağlanan Türk-Yunan Nüfus Mübadelesi, uluslararası bir örgüt tarafından (Cemiyet-i Akvam) onanan ilk zorunlu göç hareketi olarak tarihe geçmiştir. Yarattığı birçok soruna rağmen, Mübadele, ülkeler arası ihtilafı çözen ve etnik/dinî türdeşliği sağlamak suretiyle ulus-devleti pekiştiren bir olay olarak bir tür başarı öyküsü haline dönüştürülmüştür. Gerçekleştiği andan günümüze değin, özellikle etnik milliyetçiliğin yükseldiği iki ayrı dönem olan 1930larda ve 1990larda, bu başarı öyküsü hem siyasi hem de akademik söylemde geniş yankı bulmuştur. Bu çalışma, Mübadeleye atfedilen başarı öyküsünün bir tür üst-anlatı haline gelmesini sağlayan iki temel metni konuyla ilgili son dönemde ortaya çıkan eleştirel tarih yazını ışığında ele alarak, bu üst-anlatının olguları, varsayımları ve çıkarımları açısından dayanaktan yoksun olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, O. (2010). Ladas, Pentzopoulos and the Turco-Greek Exchange of Populations: An analysis of a metanarrative. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 119, 184–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/366965

References (22)

  1. Alexandris, A. (1992) The Greek Minority of Istanbul and Greek-Turkish Relations 1918-1974, Atina: Centre for Asia Minor Studies. Bell-Fialkoff, A. (1996)
  2. Ethnic Cleansing, New York: St. Martin Press.
  3. Clogg, R. (1995) “Brutality Management”, The Times Higher Education, (1 Aralık). Eddy, C. (1931)
  4. Greece and the Greek Refugees, Londra: George Allen & Unwin LTD. Fedder, D. “Israel Should Prepare for Armageddon”; http://www.townhall.com/columnists/donfeder/
  5. Fedder, D. http://www.jpost.com/com/Archive/01.Jun.1998/Opinion/Article-1.html.
  6. Frank, Matthew. (2007) Expelling the Germans: British Public Opinion and Post-1945
  7. Population Transfer in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Ginnakos, S. A. (2009) “Unacceptable Solutions to Ethnic Conflict: The 1923 Calamity of Population Expulsions,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology, Cilt. 36, 1, s. 19-35.
  9. Gürsoy, Y. (2008) “The Effects of the Population Exchange on the Greek and Turkish Political Regimes in the 1930s,”
  10. East European Quarterly, XLII, 2, s. 95-128.
  11. Hirschon, R. (1989) Heirs of the Greek Catastrophe: The Social Life of Asia Minor Refugees in Piraeus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Hirschon, R. (der.) (2003) Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange between Greece and Turkey, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books. http://arsiv.ntvmsnbc.com/news/465353.asp
  13. Inbar, E. (2009) “The Rise and Demise of the Two-State Paradigm,” ORBIS, A Journal of World Affairs, Cilt. 53, 2, s. 265-283.
  14. Katz, Y. (1992) “Transfer of Population as a Solution to International Disputes, Population Exchanges between Greece and Turkey as a Model for Plans to Solve the Jewish-Arab Dispute in Palestine during the 1930s”,
  15. Political Geography, Cilt XI, No 1, s. 55-72.
  16. Katz, Y. (1998) Partner to Partition: The Jewish Agency’s Partition Plan in the Mandate Era, Londra: Frank Cass. Kaufmann, C. (1996) “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars,” International Security, Cilt 20, no. 4, Bahar, s. 136-175.
  17. Kaufmann, C. (1998) “When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century,” International Security, Cilt 23, no. 2, Güz, s. 120-156.
  18. Kitsikis, D. (1964)
  19. Yunan Propagandası, İstanbul:
  20. Meydan Neşriyat. Kontogiorgi, E. (2006) Population Exchange in Greek Macedonia: The Rural Settlement of Refugees, 1922-1930, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Ladas, S. P. (1932)
  22. The Exchange of Minorities, Bulgaria, Greece, and Turkey, New York: The MacMillan Company. “L