Journals / Toplum ve Bilim / 2013 / Sayı: 128

Desire and politics: An attempt of mapping the 1970 s Turkey

Arzu ve politika: '70'lere dair bir haritalama denemesi

Pages
84–101
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Instead of taking the period as a fruitless pro- cess throughout which desires were suppressed for the sake of supreme objec- tives or were deferred up until the revolution, it will try to track the 1970s as a fertile time period in which the desire-fluxes of social groups, even though always subjected to the re-territorialization processes, could overflow the given segmen- tarities, flee the territories that were fixed for themselves and make encounters that increased the puissance of the society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is built as a broad mapping attempt about how desire operated across the social plane in the 70s in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is built as a broad mapping attempt about how desire operated across the social plane in the 70s in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Instead of taking the period as a fruitless pro- cess throughout which desires were suppressed for the sake of supreme objec- tives or were deferred up until the revolution, it will try to track the 1970s as a fertile time period in which the desire-fluxes of social groups, even though always subjected to the re-territorialization processes, could overflow the given segmen- tarities, flee the territories that were fixed for themselves and make encounters that increased the puissance of the society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is built as a broad mapping attempt about how desire operated across the social plane in the 70s in Turkey. Instead of taking the period as a fruitless pro- cess throughout which desires were suppressed for the sake of supreme objec- tives or were deferred up until the revolution, it will try to track the 1970s as a fertile time period in which the desire-fluxes of social groups, even though always subjected to the re-territorialization processes, could overflow the given segmen- tarities, flee the territories that were fixed for themselves and make encounters that increased the puissance of the society.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 70ler Türkiyesinde arzunun toplumsal uzamda nasıl iş gördüğüne dair genel bir haritalama girişimi olarak kurgulanmıştır. 70leri, zannedildiği gibi yalnızca yüce amaçlar uğruna arzuların bastırıldığı ya da devrim sonrasına ertelendiği kısır bir süreç olarak değil, ama bundan öte, toplumsal grupların arzu akışlarının verili bölmelerden taşabildikleri, her daim yeniden-yerliyurtlulaştırma süreçlerine tabi olsalar da, kendilerine tayin edilmiş yeryurtları terk edip birbirleriyle karşılaşabildikleri, toplumun varolma kudretini arttıran verimli bir dönem olarak izlemeye çalışacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİRDAL, S. C. (2013). Desire and politics: An attempt of mapping the 1970 s Turkey. Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı: 128, 84–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/366906

References (30)

  1. Aydınoğlu, Ergun (2011) Türkiye Solu (1960-1980), 3. Baskı,
  2. Versus Kitap, İstanbul.
  3. Baker, Ulus (2011) “Spinoza: Hayatın Geometrisi”, Yüzeybilim Fragmanlar, (der.) Ege Berensel, Birikim Yayınları, İstanbul, s.31-40.
  4. Belge, Murat (1987) “The Left”, Turkey in Transition: New Perspectives (der.) I.C. Shick ve E. A. Tonak, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s. 147-176.
  5. Birdal, Serhat Celâl (2013) “‘Kaçak Anı’ ya da ‘Tarihin Tüylerini Tersine Taramak’”, Birikim Güncel, 07.07.2013, http://www.birikimdergisi.com/birikim/makale.aspx?mid=992 (son güncelleme tarihi 15.09.2013).
  6. Bora, Aksu (2013) “Kadınlar, Rüyalar, Ejderhalar”, Toplum ve Bilim, 127: 196-207.
  7. Bozkurt, Sümercan (2008) The Resistance Committees: Devrimci Yol and the Question of Revolutionary Organization in Turkey in the late 1970s, yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  8. Colebrook, Claire (2009) Gilles Deleuze, çev. Cem Soydemir, Doğu Batı Yayınları,
  9. İstanbul.
  10. Deleuze, Gilles ve Claire Parnet (1987a) Dialogues, ing. çev. Hugh Tomlinson, Barbara Habberjam, Columbia University Press,
  11. New York. Deleuze, Gilles ve Félix Guattari (1987b) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, İng. çev. Brian Massumi, University of Minnesota Press,
  12. Minneapolis. Deleuze, Gilles (2010) Bergsonculuk, 2. Baskı, çev. Hakan Yücefer, Otonom Yayınları,
  13. İstanbul.
  14. Deleuze, Gilles ve Félix Guattari (2012) Anti-Ödipus: Kapitalizm ve Şizofreni 1, çev. Fahrettin Ege, Hakan Erdoğan, Mustafa Yiğitalp, Bilim ve Sosyalizm Yayınları,
  15. Ankara.
  16. Ersan, Vehbi (2013) 1970’lerde Türkiye Solu, İletişim Yayınları,
  17. İstanbul.
  18. Guattari, Félix (2012) “Faşizmin Mikropolitikası”, çev. Serhat Celâl Birdal, FelsefeYazın, 20: 23-31.
  19. Holland, Eugene. W. (2007) Deleuze ve Guattari’nin Anti-Oedipus’u, çev. Ali Utku, Mukadder Erkan, Otonom Yayınları,
  20. İstanbul.
  21. Mater, Tayfun (der.) (1989) Devrimci Yol Savunması: 12 Eylül Öncesi ve Sonrası, Simge Yayınevi,
  22. Ankara.
  23. Erdoğan, Necmi (1998) “Demokratik soldan Devrimci Yol’a: 1970’lerde sol popülizm üzerine notlar”, Toplum ve Bilim, 78: 22-37.
  24. Goodchild, Philip (2005) Deleuze & Guattari: Arzu Politikasına Giriş, çev. Rahmi G. Öğdül, Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  25. İstanbul.
  26. Mater, Nadire (2012) Sokak Güzeldir: 68’de ne oldu?, 3. Baskı,
  27. Metis Yayınları,
  28. İstanbul.
  29. Müftüoğlu, Oğuzhan (1988) “Devrimci Yol Üzerine Notlar”, Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi, cilt 7, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, s. 2250-2253.
  30. Özdemir Taştan, İnan (2012) Devrimci Yol’un Retor