Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the longitudinal deformation of the left ventricular myocardium in subjects with impaired fasting glucose with and without increased glycated hemoglobin

Pages
160–167
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The systolic strain(–16.1%±2.0 vs. –16.8%±2.4; p=0.214), systolic strain rate (–1.3±0.2 s–1 vs. –1.4±0.2 s–1; p=0.403), and early and late-diastolic strain rates (1.4±0.3s–1 vs. 1.5±0.3 s–1; p=0.456 and 0.9±0.1 s–1 vs. 1.0±0.2 s–1; p=0.684, respectively) of the LV myocardium were not statistically different between theIFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c as detected using 2DSTE.Conclusion: The longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium as detected using 2DSTE in the subjects without significant epicardial coronaryartery stenosis was not statistically significantly different between the IFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Prediabetes comprises a heterogeneous group because of the poor concordance of its definition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study was to evaluatethe longitudinal deformation of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium at the two opposite ends of the prediabetes spectrum as defined byfasting blood sugar and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).Methods: Eighty consecutive subjects in a cross-sectional single-center study with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (100–126 mg/dL) and withoutsignificant epicardial coronary artery stenosis seen on selective coronary angiography were included in our study and were divided into twogroups based on their HbA1c levels (<5.7% and 5.7%–6.4%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The systolic strain(–16.1%±2.0 vs. –16.8%±2.4; p=0.214), systolic strain rate (–1.3±0.2 s–1 vs. –1.4±0.2 s–1; p=0.403), and early and late-diastolic strain rates (1.4±0.3s–1 vs. 1.5±0.3 s–1; p=0.456 and 0.9±0.1 s–1 vs. 1.0±0.2 s–1; p=0.684, respectively) of the LV myocardium were not statistically different between theIFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c as detected using 2DSTE.Conclusion: The longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium as detected using 2DSTE in the subjects without significant epicardial coronaryartery stenosis was not statistically significantly different between the IFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Prediabetes comprises a heterogeneous group because of the poor concordance of its definition. The aim of our study was to evaluatethe longitudinal deformation of the left ventricular (LV) myocardium at the two opposite ends of the prediabetes spectrum as defined byfasting blood sugar and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).Methods: Eighty consecutive subjects in a cross-sectional single-center study with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (100–126 mg/dL) and withoutsignificant epicardial coronary artery stenosis seen on selective coronary angiography were included in our study and were divided into twogroups based on their HbA1c levels (<5.7% and 5.7%–6.4%). The longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium was compared between the twogroups using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE).Results: The Student t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, or X2 test was used for data analysis, whichever was appropriate. The systolic strain(–16.1%±2.0 vs. –16.8%±2.4; p=0.214), systolic strain rate (–1.3±0.2 s–1 vs. –1.4±0.2 s–1; p=0.403), and early and late-diastolic strain rates (1.4±0.3s–1 vs. 1.5±0.3 s–1; p=0.456 and 0.9±0.1 s–1 vs. 1.0±0.2 s–1; p=0.684, respectively) of the LV myocardium were not statistically different between theIFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c as detected using 2DSTE.Conclusion: The longitudinal deformation of the LV myocardium as detected using 2DSTE in the subjects without significant epicardial coronaryartery stenosis was not statistically significantly different between the IFG subjects with and without increased HbA1c.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKHAVAN-KHALEGHİ, N., HOSSEİNSABET, A. (2018). Evaluation of the longitudinal deformation of the left ventricular myocardium in subjects with impaired fasting glucose with and without increased glycated hemoglobin. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 160–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/366823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Edwards CM, Cusi K. Prediabetes: A Worldwide Epidemic. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2016; 45: 751-64. [CrossRef] Giráldez-García C, Sangrós FJ, Díaz-Redondo A, Franch-Nadal J, Serrano R, Díez J, et al. Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles in Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose and/or Hemoglobin A1c 5.7% to 6.4%: Evidence for a Gradient According to Diagnostic Criteria: The PREDAPS Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e1935. [CrossRef] Braga F, Dolci A, Mosca A, Panteghini M. Biological variability of glycated hemoglobin. Clin Chim Acta 2010; 411: 1606-10. [CrossRef] Barr RG, Nathan DM, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Tests of glycemia for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 263- 72. [CrossRef] Bock G, Dalla Man C, Campioni M, Chittilapilly E, Basu R, Toffolo G, et al. Pathogenesis of pre-diabetes: mechanisms of fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in people with impaired fasting glucose and/ or impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 2006; 55: 3536-49. [CrossRef] Abdul-Ghani MA, Matsuda M, Jani R, Jenkinson CP, Coletta DK, Kaku K, et al. The relationship between fasting hyperglycemia and insulin secretion in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008; 295: E401-6. [CrossRef] Akçay M, Aslan AN, Kasapkara HA, Ayhan H, Durmaz T, Keleş T, et al. Assessment of the left ventricular function in normotensive prediabetics: a tissue Doppler echocardiography study. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2016; 60: 341-7. [CrossRef] Wang Y, Ma R, Ding G, Hou D, Li Z, Yin L, et al. Left ventricular energy loss assessed by vector flow mapping in patients with prediabetes and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 1730-40.
  2. Ceyhan K, Kadı H, Koç F, Çelik A, Öztürk A, Önalan O. Longitudinal left ventricular function in normotensive prediabetics: a tissue Doppler and strain/strain rate echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25: 349-56. [CrossRef] Wang Y, Ma R, Ding G, Hou D, Li Z, Yin L, et al. Left ventricular energy loss assessed by vector flow mapping in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 1730-40.
  3. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29: 277- 314. [CrossRef] Lang RM, Bada