Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 10

Comparison of floating wire and single wire techniques in right coronary ostial lesions in terms of procedural features and one-year clinical follow-up results

Pages
830–835
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The floating wire technique in right coronary ostial lesions provides a significant advantage over the single wire technique according to procedural and clinical follow-up results

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The floating wire technique is a special technique for solving interventional problems in aorta- ostial lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The floating wire technique was performed on 64 patients, and the single wire technique was performed on 62 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The floating wire technique in right coronary ostial lesions provides a significant advantage over the single wire technique according to procedural and clinical follow-up results
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The floating wire technique is a special technique for solving interventional problems in aorta- ostial lesions. There are no long-term data in the literature for the floating wire technique in right aorto-ostial lesions. Methods: One hundred twenty six patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of these patients had a critical right coronary aortoostial lesion. The floating wire technique was performed on 64 patients, and the single wire technique was performed on 62 patients. The two groups were compared with each other in terms of lesional and procedural properties. Additionally, 1-year clinical follow-up results were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in terms of lesion properties between the groups. In the floating wire group, mean stent length, number of stents, mean procedure time, mean contrast volume, and mean fluoroscopy time were significantly lower than in the single wire group. At 1 year, 1 patient from each group had myocardial infarction, and no mortality was observed. In the floating wire group, the number of patients who experienced angina and the target lesion revascularization rate were both significantly lower than in the single wire group. Conclusion: The floating wire technique in right coronary ostial lesions provides a significant advantage over the single wire technique according to procedural and clinical follow-up results

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞTAN, A., ÖZEL, E., ÖZTÜRK, A., UYAR, S., ÖZCAN, E. E., ŞENARSLAN, Ö., TAVLI, T. (2015). Comparison of floating wire and single wire techniques in right coronary ostial lesions in terms of procedural features and one-year clinical follow-up results. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 10, 830–835. https://ajindex.com/articles/366768

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Freeman M, Clark DJ, Andrianopoulos N, Duffy SJ, Lim HS, Brennan A, et al. Melbourne Interventional Group. Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial lesions in the era of drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 763-8. [CrossRef] Stewart JT, Ward DE, Davies MJ, Pepper JR. Isolated coronary ostial stenosis: observations on the pathology. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 917-20. Rissanen V. Occurrence of coronary ostial stenosis in a necropsy series of myocardial infarction, sudden death, and violent death. Br Heart J 1975; 37: 182-91. [CrossRef] Tan KH, Sulke N, Taub N, Sowton E. Percutaneous transluminal coro- nary angioplasty of aorta ostial, non-aorta ostial, and branch ostial stenoses: acute and long-term outcome. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 631-9.
  2. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligönül U, Topol EJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990; 82: 1193-202. [CrossRef] Chin K. An approach to ostial lesion management. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep 2001; 3: 87-9.
  3. Luz A, Hughes C, Magalhães R, Bisceglia T, Descoutures F, Tamamm K, et al. Stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions: long- term follow-up and predictors of outcome. EuroIntervention 2012; 7: 1069-76. [CrossRef] Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Fishman J, Leimgruber P, Myler RK, Stertzer SH, et al. Multicenter study of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for right coronary artery ostial stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 1214-8. [CrossRef] Ko E, Natsuaki M, Toyofuku M, Morimoto T, Matsumura Y, Oi M, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for ostial right coronary artery lesions: five-year outcomes from the j-Cypher registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2014; 29: 200-8. [CrossRef] Zampieri P, Colombo A, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Finci L. Results of coro- nary stenting of ostial lesions. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 901-3. [CrossRef] Szabo S, Abramowitz B, Vaitkus PT. New technique of aorto-ostial stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 212H. Kurbaan AS, Kelly PA, Sigwart U. Cutting balloon angioplasty and stenting for aorto-ostial lesions. Heart 1997; 77: 350-2.
  4. Fischell TA, Malhotra S, Khan S. A new ostial stent positioning system (Ostial Pro) for the accurate placement of stents to treat aorto-ostial lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 353-7. [CrossRef] Latib A, Chieffo A. The Cappella Sidegua