Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6

Investigation of X-ray permeability of surgical gloves coated with different contrast agents

Pages
424–427
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate provided the best radiation absorption compared with latex gloves coated with other radiodense contrast agents.Conclusion: Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate may provide protection equivalent to lead gloves.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and radiation protection capability of latex gloves coated with various contrast agents as an alternative to lead gloves.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The following six groups were created to evaluate the permeability of X-ray in this experimental study: lead gloves, two different nonionic contrast media (iopromide 370/100 mg I/mL and iomeprol 400/100 mg I/mL), 10% povidone-iodine (PV-I), 240/240 g/mL barium sulphate and a mixture of equal amounts of all contrast agents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate provided the best radiation absorption compared with latex gloves coated with other radiodense contrast agents.Conclusion: Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate may provide protection equivalent to lead gloves.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and radiation protection capability of latex gloves coated with various contrast agents as an alternative to lead gloves. Methods: The following six groups were created to evaluate the permeability of X-ray in this experimental study: lead gloves, two different nonionic contrast media (iopromide 370/100 mg I/mL and iomeprol 400/100 mg I/mL), 10% povidone-iodine (PV-I), 240/240 g/mL barium sulphate and a mixture of equal amounts of all contrast agents. A radiation dose detector was placed in coated latex gloves for each one. The absorption values of radiation from latex gloves coated with various contrast agents were measured and compared with the absorption of radiation from lead gloves. This study was designed as an 'experimental study'. Results: The mean absorption value of X-ray from lead gloves was 3.0±0.08 ?G/s. The mean absorption values of X-ray from latex gloves coated with various contrast agents were 3.7±0.09 ?G/s (iopromide 370/100 mg I/mL), 3.6±0.09 ?G/s (iomeprol 400/100 mg I/mL), 3.7±0.04 ?G/s (PV-I), 3.1±0.07 ?G/s (barium sulphate) and 3.8±0.05 ?G/s (mixture of all contrast agents). Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate provided the best radiation absorption compared with latex gloves coated with other radiodense contrast agents.Conclusion: Latex gloves coated with barium sulphate may provide protection equivalent to lead gloves.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYAN, M., YAŞAR, S., SAYGIN, M., YILMAZ, Ö., AKTAŞ, A. R., KAYAN, F., TÜRKER, Y., ÇETİNKAYA, G. (2016). Investigation of X-ray permeability of surgical gloves coated with different contrast agents. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6, 424–427. https://ajindex.com/articles/366747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bushong SC. Radiologic Science for Technologist Seventh Edition St. Louis: Mosby; 1998
  2. Terato H, Ide H. Clustered DNA damage induced by heavy ion particles. Biol Sci Space 2004; 18: 206-15
  3. Tokuyama Y, Furusawa Y, Ide H, Yasui A, Terato H. Role of isolated and clustered DNA damage and the post-irradiating repair process in the effects of heavy ion beam irradiation. J Radiat Res 2015 Feb 25. Epub ahead of print
  4. Azzam EI, Jay-Gerin JP, Pain D. Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett 2012; 31: 48-60
  5. Sert C, Çelik MS, Akdağ Z, Ketani MA, Nergiz Y. The radioprotective effect of vitamins C, E and Vitamin E + Glutathione on the small intestine and the thyroid gland in rats irradiated with X-rays. Turk J Med Sci 2000; 30: 417-25
  6. Dorne HL. Use of flexible protective gloves: another viewpoint. Radiology 1990; 176: 287-8
  7. Ullman JM. Increasing the usefulness of disposable lead gloves. Radiology 1990; 174: 581
  8. Kovalchuk O, Ponton A, Filkowski J, Kovalchuk I. Dissimilar genome response to acute and chronic low-dose radiation in male and female mice. Mutat Res 2004; 550: 59-72
  9. Abolfath RM, Carlson DJ, Chen ZJ, Nath R. A molecular dynamics simulation of DNA damage induction by ionizing radiation. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58: 7143-7
  10. Wagner LK, McNeese MD, Marx MV, Siegel EL. Severe skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy: case report and review of the literature. Radiology 1999; 213: 773-6
  11. Obert M, Kohl LM, Graf N, Krombach GA, Verhoff MA. Contrast enhancement using curd and contrast agent mixtures for ex vivo vessel imaging in computed tomography. Rofo 2014; 186: 959-61
  12. Niikura R, Nagata N, Shimbo T, Akiyama J, Uemura N. Colonoscopy can miss diverticula of the left colon identified by barium enema. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 2362-7
  13. Calder PR, Tennent TD, Allen PW. Assessment of the efficacy of Proguard RR-2 radio-protective gloves during forearm manipulation. Injury 2003; 34: 159-61
  14. Von Wrangel A, Cederblad A, Rodriguez-Catarino M. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 490-6
  15. Kelsey CA, Mettler FA Jr. Flexible protective gloves: The emperor's new clothes? Radiology 1990; 174; 275-6.