Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 9

Feasibility and clinical benefit of cognitive-behavioral interventionfor preparing patients for transesophageal echocardiography

Pages
684–688
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also results in reduced use of sedatives during the examination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Despite premedication, anxiety in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is prevalent, often causing adverse physiological and psychological effects and contributing to decreased patient compliance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group comprised 49 patients (26 men, 66±8 years old) referred for TEE.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also results in reduced use of sedatives during the examination.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Despite premedication, anxiety in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is prevalent, often causing adverse physiological and psychological effects and contributing to decreased patient compliance. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) in patients undergoing TEE and to assess its impact on the severity of anxiety, patient's and physician's comfort, and administered dose of sedatives.Methods: Our study was designed as a prospective, single-center, single-blinded, case-controlled pilot study. The study group comprised 49 patients (26 men, 66±8 years old) referred for TEE. Before the examination, 26 randomly selected patients underwent CBI. Sedatives were administered, if necessary. After the examination, patient anxiety and patient's and physician's comfort were evaluated using dedicated questionnaires and scores. Intergroup comparison was performed using Student's t-test for independent variables and Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: The mean level of pre-TEE distress and anxiety were significantly lower in patients receiving CBI than in those without intervention (p=0.022). Furthermore, the application of CBI significantly reduced patient's discomfort (p<0.001) and resulted in increased comfort of physician (p<0.001) during TEE. The need of sedative administration (31% vs. 91%, p<0.001) and its mean dose was significantly lower in patients receiving CBI (1.6±0.5 mg vs. 2.7±1.6 mg midazolam, p=0.009).Conclusions: CBI is feasible in patients undergoing TEE. It decreases patient's anxiety and discomfort and increases physician's comfort. It also results in reduced use of sedatives during the examination.

🔖

Cite This Article

MIK, P. W., SOBCZAK, M., MISKOWIEC, D., OKROJEK, K. W., KASPRZAK, D. J., LIPIEC, P. (2016). Feasibility and clinical benefit of cognitive-behavioral interventionfor preparing patients for transesophageal echocardiography. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 9, 684–688. https://ajindex.com/articles/366728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Flachskampf FA, Badano L, Daniel WG, Feneck RO, Fox KF, Fraser AG, et al. Recommendations for transoesophageal echocardiogra- phy: update 2010. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 557-76. de Belder MA, Leech G, Camm AJ. Transesophageal echocardiog- raphy in unsedated outpatients: technique and patient tolerance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 375-9.
  2. Khalid O, Srivastava R, Mulhall A, Paladugu A, Stoddard M, Lippmann S. Conscious sedation: for a TEE, is it always required? Echocardiography 2010; 27: 74-6.
  3. Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, Lutgendorf S, Berbaum ML, Ber- baum KS, et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for in- vasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 1486-90.
  4. Lang EV, Joyce JS, Spiegel D, Hamilton D, Lee KK. Self-hypnotic relaxation during interventional radiological procedures: effects on pain perception and intravenous drug use. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 1996; 44: 106-19.
  5. Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Suther- land GR, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A mul- ticenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation 1991; 83: 817-21. Fischer C. Transesophageal Echocardiography in Comfort and Safety. Rev Bras Ecocardiogr Imagem Cardiovasc 2014;24:11-3.
  6. Eren G, Doğan Y, Demir G, Tulubaş E, Hergünsel O, Tekdoş Y, et al. Hypnosis for sedation in transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison with midazolam. Ann Saudi Med 2015; 35: 58-63.
  7. Schupp CJ, Berbaum K, Berbaum M, Lang EV. Pain and anxiety dur- ing interventional radiologic procedures: effect of patients' state anxiety at baseline and modulation by nonpharmacologic analge- sia adjuncts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16: 1585-92.
  8. Sutaria N, Northridge D, Denvir M. A survey of sedation and moni- toring practices during transoesophageal echocardiography in the UK: are recommended guidelines being followed? Heart 2000; 84: ii19. Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, Lopez R, Trolli P, Dumot JA, et al. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2689-95.
  9. Blondheim DS, Levi D, Marmor AT. Mild sedation before trans- esophageal echo induces significant hemodynamic and respira- tory depression. Echocardiography 2004; 21: 241-5. José GM, Silva CE, Ferreira LD, Novaes YP, Monaco CG, Gil MA, et al. Effective dose of sedation in transesophageal echocardiogra- phy: relation to age, body surface area and left ventricle function. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009; 93: 623-9.
  10. Blondon H, Compan F. Feasibi