SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Unusual complication of carotid artery stenting as the result of a proximal emboli protection device (the Mo.Ma): Iatrogenic common carotid artery dissection

Fatih GÜNGÖREN
Feyzullah BEŞLİ
Zülkif TANRIVERDİ
Özcan KOCATÜRK
Mustafa BEĞENÇ TAŞCANOV
Pages
203–206
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cerebral EPDs reduce the incidence of peri-procedural embolic events in patients undergoing CAS (4)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with the use of emboli protection devices (EPDs) have been demonstrated in the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (CAD) (1).
📊
Key Findings & Data:CAS has even recently become more popular than carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of CAD thanks tonewly developed techniques, including open or closed cell stents and protection devices, as well as special wires and catheters (1-3).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cerebral EPDs reduce the incidence of peri-procedural embolic events in patients undergoing CAS (4)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with the use of emboli protection devices (EPDs) have been demonstrated in the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (CAD) (1). CAS has even recently become more popular than carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of CAD thanks tonewly developed techniques, including open or closed cell stents and protection devices, as well as special wires and catheters (1-3). Cerebral EPDs reduce the incidence of peri-procedural embolic events in patients undergoing CAS (4)

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖREN, F., BEŞLİ, F., TANRIVERDİ, Z., KOCATÜRK, Ö., TAŞCANOV, M. B. (2019). Unusual complication of carotid artery stenting as the result of a proximal emboli protection device (the Mo.Ma): Iatrogenic common carotid artery dissection. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 203–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/366679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, Brückmann H. Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke 2009; 40: 841-6. 2. [No authors listed]. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1729-37. 3. Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR, Coleman TC, Breathitt L. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1589-95. 4. Knappich C, Kuehnl A, Tsantilas P, Schmid S, Breitkreuz T, Kallmayer M, et al. The use of embolic protection devices is associated with a lower stroke and death rate after carotid stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 26: 1257-65. 5. Giri J, Kennedy KF, Weinberg I, Hawkins BM, Press MC, Drachman D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of commonly used devices for carotid artery stenting: an NCDR Analysis (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 171-7. 6. Atkins MD, Bush RL. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: have they made a significant difference in outcomes? Semin Vasc Surg 2007; 20: 244-51. 7. Théron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, Courtheoux F. Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and postsurgical stenosis of carotid arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987; 8: 495-500. 8. Kassavin DS, Clair DG. An update on the role of proximal occlusion devices in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65: 271-5. 9. Giordan E, Lanzino G. Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting and Embolic Protection. Curr Cardiol Rep 2017; 19: 120. 10. Cloft HJ, Jensen ME, Kallmes DF, Dion JE. Arterial dissections complicating cerebral angiography and cerebrovascular interventions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 541-5. 11. Paramasivam S, Leesch W, Fifi J, Ortiz R, Niimi Y, Berenstein A. Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2012; 4: 331-5. 12. Wein T, Lindsay MP, Côté R, Foley N, Berlingieri J, Bhogal S, et al; Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Stroke Best Practice Committees. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Secondary prevention of stroke, sixth edition practice guidelines, update 2017. Int J Stroke 2018; 13: 420-43.