SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

The patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis

Yongxing Lİ
Li BAOTANG
Caifei Lİ
YunChen YU
Xiaobo LİU
Lei Lİ
Zijun Lİ
Chenxi DUAN
Wenming HOU
Sheng LUO
Pages
235–240
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared with the sequential group, the individual one is statistically significant in the graft patency [risk ratio (RR)=1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI ) 1.01–1.13; p=0.02] and anastomosis patency (RR=1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.12; p=0.005).Conclusion: Our study suggested that the patency of the individual group, in terms of graft and anastomosis patency, is better than that of the sequential one. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 235-43)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods: Our study used the Cochrane Library database, Excerpta Medica database, Web of Science, and PubMed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We used Review Manager and STATA software for statistical analysis.Results: Fifteen cohort studies were analyzed, including 10681 patients, 12957 grafts, and 4341 anastomoses, under sequential and individual CABG.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared with the sequential group, the individual one is statistically significant in the graft patency [risk ratio (RR)=1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI ) 1.01–1.13; p=0.02] and anastomosis patency (RR=1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.12; p=0.005).Conclusion: Our study suggested that the patency of the individual group, in terms of graft and anastomosis patency, is better than that of the sequential one. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 235-43)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To compare the patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods: Our study used the Cochrane Library database, Excerpta Medica database, Web of Science, and PubMed. Studies comparing the outcomes of graft or anastomosis patency were assessed independently by two reviewers to identify the literature of satisfaction. We used Review Manager and STATA software for statistical analysis.Results: Fifteen cohort studies were analyzed, including 10681 patients, 12957 grafts, and 4341 anastomoses, under sequential and individual CABG. Compared with the sequential group, the individual one is statistically significant in the graft patency [risk ratio (RR)=1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI ) 1.01–1.13; p=0.02] and anastomosis patency (RR=1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.12; p=0.005).Conclusion: Our study suggested that the patency of the individual group, in terms of graft and anastomosis patency, is better than that of the sequential one. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 235-43)

🔖

Cite This Article

Lİ, Y., BAOTANG, L., Lİ, C., YU, Y., LİU, X., Lİ, L., Lİ, Z., DUAN, C., HOU, W., LUO, S. (2020). The patency of graft and anastomoses in sequential and individual coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 235–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/366665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Flemma RJ, Johnson WD, Lepley D Jr. Triple aorto-coronary vein bypass as treatment for coronary insufficiency. Arch Surg 1971; 103: 82-3
  2. Walther S, Schuetz GM, Hamm B, Dewey M. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses). Rofo 2011; 183: 1106-10
  3. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysis. Ottawa (CA): Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; c2020 [cited 2020. May. 18]. Available from: URL;
  4. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from: URL;
  5. Wendt D, Schmidt D, Wasserfuhr D, Osswald B, Thielmann M, Tossios P, et al. Comparison of sequential left internal thoracic artery grafting and separate left internal thoracic artery and venous grafting: A 5-year follow-up. Herz 2010; 35: 397-402
  6. Vural KM, Sener E, Taşdemir O. Long-term patency of sequential and individual saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19: 140-4
  7. Schwann TA, Zacharias A, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah AS, Habib RH. Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 31-9
  8. Park SJ, Kim HJ, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Lee JW, et al. Sequential Versus Individual Saphenous Vein Grafting During Coronary Arterial Bypass Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 109: 1165-73
  9. Oz BS, Iyem H, Akay HT, Bolcal C, Yokusoglu M, Kuralay E, et al. Midterm angiographic comparison of sequential and individual anastomosis techniques for diagonal artery. J Cardiac Surg 2006; 21: 471-4
  10. Meurala H, Valle M, Hekali P, Somer K, Frick MH, Harjola PT. Patency of sequential versus single vein grafts in coronary bypass surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 30: 147-51
  11. Kim HJ, Lee TY, Kim JB, Cho WC, Jung SH, Chung CH, et al. The impact of sequential versus single anastomoses on flow characteristics and mid-term patency of saphenous vein grafts in coronary bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 750-4
  12. Gao C, Wang M, Wa