Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 6

Focal atrial tachycardia-the localization differences between men and women: A study of 487 consecutive patients

Pages
405–409
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conventional catheter mapping, electroanatomic contact mapping, and noncontact mapping were used to assess the origin of ectopic atrial tachycardia.Results: Overall, 451 foci were successfully ablated in 436 patients (90%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The preferential sites for focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) are mainly in the right atrium in both sexes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated possible sex differences in the distribution of FAT in a large cohort of patients referred for ablation.Methods: From 2004 to 2019, 487 patients (298 women) were referred to our institution for ablation of FAT.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conventional catheter mapping, electroanatomic contact mapping, and noncontact mapping were used to assess the origin of ectopic atrial tachycardia.Results: Overall, 451 foci were successfully ablated in 436 patients (90%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The preferential sites for focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) are mainly in the right atrium in both sexes. However, a limited number of stud-ies have indicated that sex differences in the localization of FAT. This study investigated possible sex differences in the distribution of FAT in a large cohort of patients referred for ablation.Methods: From 2004 to 2019, 487 patients (298 women) were referred to our institution for ablation of FAT. A standard electrophysiological study was conducted, and isoproterenol or atropine was given when needed. Conventional catheter mapping, electroanatomic contact mapping, and noncontact mapping were used to assess the origin of ectopic atrial tachycardia.Results: Overall, 451 foci were successfully ablated in 436 patients (90%). Although the foci located along the crista terminalis were more com-mon in women than in men (42% vs. 29%; p=0.023), the opposite were found in the foci located along the tricuspid annulus (5% vs. 11%; p=0.032) and the right atrial appendage (RAA) (1% vs. 3%; p=0.032). Other locations were similarly distributed in men and women. In addition, the presence of persistent FAT was more frequent in men than in women (22% vs. 5%; p<0.001). Finally, the difference in the induction pattern of FAT was also remarkable between sexes.Conclusion: The distribution of FAT in women and men is different. In addition, persistent FAT seems more often in men than in women. The different distribution, persistency, and induction pattern of FAT should be considered in the successful management of this type of tachycardia. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 405-9)

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, Y., INSULANDER, P., BASTANI, H., DRCA, N., SALUVEER, O., TAPANAINEN, J., BOURKE, T., KENNEBACK, G., SCHWIELER, J., BRAUNSHWEIG, F., JENSEN-URSTAD, M. (2020). Focal atrial tachycardia-the localization differences between men and women: A study of 487 consecutive patients. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 6, 405–409. https://ajindex.com/articles/366655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Schulze-Bahr E, Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Bertrand J, Breithardt G. Gender differences in cardiac arrhythmias. Herz 2005; 30: 390-400
  2. Bernal O, Moro C. Cardiac arrythmia in women. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 609-18
  3. Kammeraad JA, Balaji S, Oliver RP, Chugh SS, Halperin BD, Kron J, et al. Nonautomatic focal atrial tachycardia: characterization and ablation of a poorly understood arrhythmia in 38 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 736–42
  4. Hu YF, Huang JL, Wu TJ, Higa S, Shih CM, Tai CT, et al. Gender differences of electrophysiological characteristics in focal atrial tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 97-100
  5. Roberts-Thomson KC, Kistler PM, Kalman JM. Focal atrial tachycardia I: clinical features, diagnosis, mechanisms, and anatomic location. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006; 29: 643-52
  6. Porter MJ, Morton JB, Denman R, Lin AC, Tierney S, Santucci PA, et al. Influence of age and gender on the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 2004; 1: 393-6
  7. Morris GM, Segan L, Wong G, Wynn G, Watts T, Heck P, et al. Atrial Tachycardia Arising From the Crista Terminalis, Detailed Electrophysiological Features and Long-Term Ablation Outcomes. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2019; 5: 448-58
  8. Sánchez-Quintana D, Anderson RH, Cabrera JA, Climent V, Martin R, Farré J, et al. The terminal crest: morphological features relevant to electrophysiology. Heart 2002; 88: 406-11
  9. Morton JB, Sanders P, Das A, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Kalman JM. Focal atrial tachycardia arising from the tricuspid annulus: electrophysiologic and electrocardiographic characteristics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12: 653-9
  10. Roberts-Thomson KC, Kistler PM, Haqqani HM, McGavigan AD, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, et al. Focal atrial tachycardias arising from the right atrial appendage: electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007; 18: 367-72
  11. Freixa X, Berruezo A, Mont L, Magnani S, Benito B, Tolosana JM, et al. Characterization of focal right atrial appendage tachycardia. Europace 2008; 10: 105-9
  12. Medi C, Kalman JM, Haqqani H, Vohra JK, Morton JB, Sparks PB, et al. Tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy secondary to focal atrial tachycardia: long-term outcome after catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1791-7
  13. Chung MK, Martin DO, Sprecher D, Wazni O, Kanderian A, Carnes CA, et al. C-reactive protein elevation in patients with atrial arrhythmias: inflammatory mechanism