Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2021 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 10

Age, creatinine clearance, and ejection fraction (mACEF) score predicts long-term cardiac mortality in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy treated non-invasively

Pages
691–698
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A mACEF score ≥0.96 could be considered as a sign of poor prognosis in patients with HOCM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Presently, an effective model to predict long-term cardiac mortality in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is lacking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Over a median follow-up period of 41.9 months, 28 cardiac deaths occurred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A mACEF score ≥0.96 could be considered as a sign of poor prognosis in patients with HOCM.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Presently, an effective model to predict long-term cardiac mortality in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the modified Age, Creatinine clearance, and Ejection Fraction (mACEF) score for long-term cardiac mortality in patients with HOCM. Methods: Two hundred and ninety two patients with HOCM treated non-invasively were enrolled in this study, all of whom had intact medical information. Results: Over a median follow-up period of 41.9 months, 28 cardiac deaths occurred. In univariate Cox regression analysis, the mACEF score was associated with long-term cardiac death [hazard ratio (HR)=1.795, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.518–2.124, p<0.001]. Multiple Cox regression analysis identified the mACEF score as an independent risk factor for long-term cardiac death (adjusted HR=1.372, 95% CI 1.076-1.749, p=0.011). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for long-term cardiac death showed that the mACEF score had a considerable predictive value (area under ROC 0.844, sensitivity 89.29%, specificity 75.00%) with an optimum cut-off value of 0.96. The study population was divided into high-risk (mACEF score ≥0.96, n=91) and low-risk (mACEF score <0.96, n=201) groups according to the optimum cut-off value. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and showed a dramatic higher rate of long-term cardiac mortality in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (27.4% vs. 1.7%, p<0.001 by log-rank test). Conclusion: The mACEF score has a considerable predictive value for long-term cardiac mortality in patients with HOCM treated non-invasively. A mACEF score ≥0.96 could be considered as a sign of poor prognosis in patients with HOCM.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAO, J., SHAO, C., WANG, W., MENG, X., ZHANG, K., WANG, J., ZHENG, M., TANG, Y. D. (2021). Age, creatinine clearance, and ejection fraction (mACEF) score predicts long-term cardiac mortality in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy treated non-invasively. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 10, 691–698. https://ajindex.com/articles/366637

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Veselka J, Anavekar NS, Charron P. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2017; 389: 1253-67
  2. Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG, Link MS, Pandian NG, Kuvin JT, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Circulation 2006; 114: 2232-9
  3. Authors/Task Force m, Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2733-79
  4. Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Frigiola A, Pelissero G. Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations: age, creatinine, ejection fraction, and the law of parsimony. Circulation 2009; 119: 3053-61
  5. Garg S, Sarno G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Girasis C, Wykrzykowska J, Dawkins KD, et al.; ARTS-II Investigators. A new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex coronary artery disease: the Clinical SYNTAX Score. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 317-26
  6. Zhang D, Yan R, Gao G, Wang H, Fu R, Li J, et al. Validating the Performance of 5 Risk Scores for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Who Achieved Complete Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35: 1058-68
  7. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Onuma Y, de Vries T, Goedhart D, Morel MA, et al. Value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF score) in assessing risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the ‘All-Comers’ LEADERS trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 47-56
  8. Ranucci M, Pistuddi V, Scolletta S, de Vincentiis C, Menicanti L. The ACEF II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2183-9
  9. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16: 31-41
  10. Capodanno D, Marcantoni C, Ministeri M, Dipasqua F, Zanoli L, Rastelli S, et al. Incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the modification of diet in renal disease equation or the Cockcroft-Gault equations to improve the global accuracy of the Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 396-402
  11. Wei XB, Wang Y, Luo JF, Hong WZ, Su Z, Zhang CX, et al. Utility of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score i