Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2021 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Early- and mid-term results of cryoablation of atrial fibrillation concomitant with robotic mitral valve surgery

Pages
266–272
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among the rest, 24 (75%) patients were in SR, 6 (18.75%) in AF, and 2 (6.25%) in paced rhythm at discharge.Conclusion: Robotic cryoablation of AF during MVS is a feasible method with favorable early- and mid-term results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, which is also associated with mitral valve disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to pres-ent our early- and mid-term result of AF cryoablation during robotic MVS.Methods: Between November 2014 and January 2020, total 34 patients who underwent robotic MVS with concomitant AF ablation were ret-rospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among the rest, 24 (75%) patients were in SR, 6 (18.75%) in AF, and 2 (6.25%) in paced rhythm at discharge.Conclusion: Robotic cryoablation of AF during MVS is a feasible method with favorable early- and mid-term results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, which is also associated with mitral valve disease. Surgical ablation is still known to be an important procedure in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) concomitant with mitral valve surgery (MVS). In this study, we aimed to pres-ent our early- and mid-term result of AF cryoablation during robotic MVS.Methods: Between November 2014 and January 2020, total 34 patients who underwent robotic MVS with concomitant AF ablation were ret-rospectively analyzed. Ten patients had a 5 years. The primary end point of the study was postoperative AF recurrence.Results: Total 32 and 2 patients underwent mitral valve replacement and mitral valve repair, respectively. Mean aortic cross-clamp and cardio-pulmonary bypass times were 141.8±32.1 min and 196±25.6 min, respectively. The SR was restored with the removal of cross-clamp and cardiac junctional rhythm was observed in 29 (85.3%) and 5 (14.7%) patients, respectively. Two in-hospital deaths secondary to low cardiac output and hepatorenal failure were recorded. Among the rest, 24 (75%) patients were in SR, 6 (18.75%) in AF, and 2 (6.25%) in paced rhythm at discharge.Conclusion: Robotic cryoablation of AF during MVS is a feasible method with favorable early- and mid-term results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KADAN, M., KUBAT, E., EROL, G., KARABACAK, K., AKYOL, F. B., YILDIRIM, V., BOLCAL, C., DEMİRKILIÇ, U. (2021). Early- and mid-term results of cryoablation of atrial fibrillation concomitant with robotic mitral valve surgery. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 266–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/366632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Seco M, Cao C, Modi P, Bannon PG, Wilson MK, Vallely MP, et al. Systematic review of robotic minimally invasive mitral valve sur-gery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2: 704–16
  2. Mandal K, Alwair H, Nifong WL, Chitwood WR Jr. Robotically as-sisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis 2013; Suppl 6: 03
  3. Ju MH, Huh JH, Lee CH, Kim HJ, Je HG, Kim JB, et al. Robotic-As-sisted Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Combined With Mitral Valve Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 762–8
  4. Türker FS, Erdogan MB, Dogan A. The Factors Affecting Rhythm Control for Cryoablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Mitral Valve Surgery. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 34: 525–34
  5. Ad N, Holmes SD, Massimiano PS, Rongione AJ, Fornaresio LM. Long-term outcome following concomitant mitral valve surgery and Cox maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155: 983–94
  6. Badhwar V, Rankin JS, Damiano RJ Jr, Gillinov AM, Bakaeen FG, Edgerton JR, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103: 329–41
  7. Aydin U, Sen O, Kadirogullari E, Kahraman Z, Onan B. Robotic Mi-tral Valve Surgey Combined with Left Atrial Reduction and Ablation Procedures. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 34: 285–9
  8. Marchetto G, Anselmino M, Rovera C, Mancuso S, Ricci D, Antolini M, et al. Results of Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Concomitant With Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery. Se-min Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 28: 271–80
  9. Bolcal C, Kadan M, Kubat E, Erol G, Doğancı S. Surgical treatment of a left ventricular apical thrombus via robotic surgery. J Card Surg 2019; 34: 216–8
  10. Demirkilic U, Kadan M, Doganci S, Bolcal C, Yildirim V, Alhan C. Un-recognized indication for robot-assisted cardiac surgery: Patients with acute psychotic disorders. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2016; 25: 117–9
  11. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Car-dio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2020: ehaa612
  12. Gillinov AM, Bagiella E, Moskowitz AJ, Raiten JM, Groh MA, Bowdish ME, et al.; CTSN. Rate Control versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibril-lation after Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1911–21
  13. Kim JB, Chong BK, Jung S