SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Drought Analysis for 2007-2008 Agricultural Year of Turkey

O. ŞİMŞEK
B. ÇAKMAK
Pages
99–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The drought was evaluated by using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Percent of Normal Index (PNI) and the analyses of precipitation and temperature analysis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:contributions were tried to be made for future production activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:contributions were tried to be made for future production activities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The drought was evaluated by using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Percent of Normal Index (PNI) and the analyses of precipitation and temperature analysis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drought · agricultural year · standardized precipitation index

Abstract

contributions were tried to be made for future production activities. The drought was evaluated by using Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Percent of Normal Index (PNI) and the analyses of precipitation and temperature analysis

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, O., ÇAKMAK, B. (2010). Drought Analysis for 2007-2008 Agricultural Year of Turkey. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 99–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/366551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anonim, 1997 Birlesmis Milletler Collesme İle Mucadele Sozlesmesi. Cevre Bakanligi Yayinlari, Ankara. Anonim, 2001 DSİ Genel Mudurlugu. 1999
  2. Haritalı İstatistik Bulteni, APK Dairesi Bsk, Gn Yn No: 991, Ankara. Anonim, 2008a DMİ Genel Mudurlugu. Meteorolojik Veri. Elektronik ve Bilgi İslem Subesi, DMİGM, Ankara. Anonim, 2008b. Tarimsal Urunlerin Uretim Miktarlari (2008 Yili İkinci Tahminleri). TUİK, Ankara.
  3. Hayes, M. 1998. Drought Indices. National Drought Mitigation Center. Lincoln, Nebraska. Komuşcu, A.U. ve A. Erkan, 2000. Kuraklık ve Collesme Sureci ve Turkiye Acisindan Analiz ve Cozumler. Yayimlanmamis Rapor. Komuşcu, A.U. 1999. Using the SPI to Analyze Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Drought in Turkey. Drought Network News, (11); 7–11.
  4. McKee, T. B., N. J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1993. The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 17-22
  5. January, Anaheim, CA, pp. 179-184.
  6. Simsek, O. 2006. 2005-2006 Tarim Yili’nin Kuraklık Analizi. Doktora Semineri A.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.
  7. Wilhite, D., and M.R. Glantz, 1987. Understanding the Drought Phenomenon -The Role of Definitions, in Wilhite, David, Easterling, William, and Wood, David, eds., Planning for drought: Boulder, Colo., Westview Press, p: 11-27.