SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 0

Evaluating Mineral Contents of Selected Bread Wheat Landrace Pure Lines Derived from West Anatolia and Marmara Regions and Cultivars by GGE Biplot

ONUR HOCAOĞLU
MEVLÜT AKÇURA
Pages
71–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate notable variability among pure lines and lesser variability for cultivars for all micronutrients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bread wheat landraces are important resources for micronutritent improvement in plant breeding programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research aims to evaluate 9 macro and micronutrient contents (Fe, Zn, B, K, Mn, Cu, Mg, Ca, Mo) of 37 bread wheat pure lines derived from landraces of West Anatolia (Eskişehir and Kütahya) and Thrace (Edirne and Kırklareli) regions and compare with 11 bread wheat cultivars by using GGE Biplot.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicate notable variability among pure lines and lesser variability for cultivars for all micronutrients.
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bread wheat landraces are important resources for micronutritent improvement in plant breeding programs. This research aims to evaluate 9 macro and micronutrient contents (Fe, Zn, B, K, Mn, Cu, Mg, Ca, Mo) of 37 bread wheat pure lines derived from landraces of West Anatolia (Eskişehir and Kütahya) and Thrace (Edirne and Kırklareli) regions and compare with 11 bread wheat cultivars by using GGE Biplot. Field trials are conducted by incomplete block design with two replications in 2011-2012 growing season in Dardanos Agricultural Facility of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. According to the biplot graphics, iron and zinc contents of genotypes were involved into the same section when boron and molibden contents were also highly correlated. Pure line L4 (TR57999/5) were the most prominent genotype for iron and zinc contents when L36 (TR38316/2) were superior by both boron and molibden contents. Copper contents of grains were found negatively correlated with iron and zinc contents. Results indicate notable variability among pure lines and lesser variability for cultivars for all micronutrients. Wheat cultivars had relatively higher Mo content while could be improved by their Fe, Zn, B, K and Ca contents. Possible candidates are introduced to be used in a future study.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOCAOĞLU, O., AKÇURA, M. (2017). Evaluating Mineral Contents of Selected Bread Wheat Landrace Pure Lines Derived from West Anatolia and Marmara Regions and Cultivars by GGE Biplot. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 71–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/366458

References (11)

  1. Akcura, M. 2011. The Relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turk J Agric For, 35 (2) 115-125.
  2. Akcura, M., O. Hocaoglu, H. Kılıc and K. Kokten 2013. Comparing wheat pure lines from Karadeniz region landraces with registered wheat cultivars by elemental content of the grain. 10th Field Crops Congress, 10-13 September 2013, Konya (In Turkish). Akcura, M. and K. Kokten 2017. Variations in grain mineral concentrations of Turkish wheat landraces germplasm. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 2017; 9 (2): 153-159.
  3. Bouis, H.E. and R.M. Welch. 2010. Biofortification: a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Science 50: S-20-S-32. Cavanagh, C.R., S. Chao, S. Wang, B.E. Huang, S. Stephen, S. Kiani and K. Forrest. 2013. Genome-Wide Comparative Diversity Uncovers Multiple Targets of Selection for Improvement in Hexaploid Wheat Landraces and Cultivars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (20): 8057–62.
  4. Fan, M.S., F.J. Zhao, S.J. Fairweather-Tait, P.R. Poulton, S.J. Dunham and S.P. McGrath. 2008. Evidence of decreasing mineral density in wheat grain over the last 160 years. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 22 (4): 315–24.
  5. Ficco, D., C. Riefolo, G. Nicastro, V. De Simone, A.M. Di Gesù, R. Beleggia, C. Platani, L. Cattivelli and P. De Vita. 2009. Phytate and mineral elements concentration in a collection of Italian durum wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research 111 (3): 235–42.
  6. Fu, Y.B. 2015. Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128 (11). Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2131–42.
  7. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58:453-467.
  8. Godfray, H.C.J., J.R. Beddington, I.R. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence, J.F. Muir, J. Pretty, S. Robinson, S.M. Thomas and C. Toulmin. 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327 (5967): 812–18.
  9. Guzman, C., A.S. Medina-Larque, G. Velu, H. Gonzalez-Santoyo, R.P. Singh, J. HuertaEspino, I. Ortiz-Monasterio and R.J. Pena. 2014. Use of wheat genetic resources to develop biofortified wheat with enhanced grain zinc and iron concentrations and desirable processing quality. Journal of Cereal Science 60 (3): 617–22.
  10. Hedden, P. 2003. The genes of green revolution. Trends Genet 2003; 19: 5-9.
  11. Hocaoglu, O. and M. Akcura. 2014. Eva