Nothing, which is seen continuous in history, can avoid it self from the corrosive effect of the change and no change can make the continuity between the past and the present discontinued even though this change is sudden and severe
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:we should think he is right to some extent since the tendencies of history provide “continuity” in history as well.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Basically, this state which is seen contradictory, in fact, is the sign of “mobility” and “dynamism” in history.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nothing, which is seen continuous in history, can avoid it self from the corrosive effect of the change and no change can make the continuity between the past and the present discontinued even though this change is sudden and severe
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
we should think he is right to some extent since the tendencies of history provide “continuity” in history as well. Basically, this state which is seen contradictory, in fact, is the sign of “mobility” and “dynamism” in history. Therefore, history is nothing but the contradiction of change and continuity. Nothing, which is seen continuous in history, can avoid it self from the corrosive effect of the change and no change can make the continuity between the past and the present discontinued even though this change is sudden and severe
🔖
Cite This Article
AKARSLAN, M. (2002). POLITICAL HISTORY: ITS SCOPE AND SIGNIFICANCE. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/3661
BORATAV Ali., (1985), Tarih ve Tarihçi: Annales Okulu Izinde, Istanbul. CARR Edward Hallet., (1980), Tarih Nedir? (Çev.: M. G. Güntürk ), Istanbul. GÖNLÜBOL Mehmet., (1979), Uluslararasi Politika: Ilkeler, Kuramlar, Kavramlar, Ankara. LADUIRE Emmanuel Le Roy., (1979), ‘ The Quantitative Revolution and French Historian; Record of Generation ’ in The Territory of the Historian, Sussex. SANDER Oral., (1992), Siyasi Tarih: IIkçag1ardan 1918’e, Ankara. SMILES Samuel., (1961), Kendine Yardim ( Self – Help ) (Çev.: Sürevya S. Berkem), Istanbul. Socialistische Diplomatie, Berlin Staat verlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik, (1974), p. 9, (Nakleden Hüner Tuncer) (1995),
Eski ve Yeni Diplomasi, Ankara. Ünal Tahsin., (1985), Türk Siyasi Tarihi (1700 – 1958), Ankara.