Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10

ReAl-life Multicenter Survey Evaluating Stroke prevention strategies in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (RAMSES study)

Pages
734–741
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although NOACs were preferred over VKAs in daily cardiology practice, there is a need for improved OAC therapies for NVAF patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Data regarding stroke prevention strategies in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are limited to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate real-life stroke prevention strategies for NVAF patients in the era of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).Methods: We established a cross-sectional, multicenter, nationwide registry of NVAF patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although NOACs were preferred over VKAs in daily cardiology practice, there is a need for improved OAC therapies for NVAF patients
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Data regarding stroke prevention strategies in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are limited to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). This study aimed to evaluate real-life stroke prevention strategies for NVAF patients in the era of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs).Methods: We established a cross-sectional, multicenter, nationwide registry of NVAF patients. All consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and without mechanical heart valves or rheumatic mitral stenosis (but including those with any degree of mitral regurgitation) were enrolled in the ReAl-life Multicenter Survey Evaluating Stroke Prevention Strategies (RAMSES Study; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02344901) in Turkey. Baseline demographic data, medical history, and medications prescribed for NVAF treatment were collected. Univariate analyses were performed for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables.Results: In total, 6273 patients from 29 provinces of Turkey were enrolled in the study between February and May 2015, with the contribution of 83 investigators. The mean age was 69.6±10.7 years; 56% of the patients were females, and one-fifth of the patients had at least one comorbid disease, the most common being hypertension (69%). The mean CHADS-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.3±1.6 and 1.6±1.1, respectively. The rate of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy use was 72% (37% NOAC and 35% VKA).Conclusion: The RAMSES study showed a higher prevalence of OAC use among NVAF patients than that reported in previous studies. Although NOACs were preferred over VKAs in daily cardiology practice, there is a need for improved OAC therapies for NVAF patients

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARAN, Ö., BETON, O., DOĞAN, V., TEKİNALP, M., AYKAN, A. Ç., KALAYCIOĞLU, E., BOLAT, İ., TAŞAR, O., ŞAFAK, Ö., KALÇIK, M., YAMAN, M., ALTUN, İ., SOYLU, M. Ö., KIRMA, C., BİTEKER, M. (2016). ReAl-life Multicenter Survey Evaluating Stroke prevention strategies in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (RAMSES study). The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 10, 734–741. https://ajindex.com/articles/365875

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the manage- ment of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2719-47.
  2. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrilla- tion. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-51.
  3. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-91.
  4. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-92.
  5. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Hal- perin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fi- brillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2093-104.
  6. Lip GY, Al-Khatib SM, Cosio FG, Banerjee A, Savelieva I, Ruskin J, et al. Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation: what can clinical registries tell us about stroke prevention and current therapeutic approaches? J Am Heart Assoc 2014 Aug 27. Epub ahead of print. Ertaş F, Kaya H, Kaya Z, Bulur S, Köse N, Gül M, et al. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in Turkey: preliminary results of the multicenter AFTER study. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2013; 41: 99-104.
  7. Nabauer M, Gerth A, Limbourg T, Schneider S, Oeff M, Kirchhof P, et al. The Registry of the German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation: patient characteristics and initial management. Euro- pace 2009; 11: 423-34.
  8. Huisman MV, Lip GY, Diener HC, Dubner SJ, Halperin JL, Ma CS, et al. Design and rationale of Global Registry on Long-Term Oral An- tithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a global registry program on long-term oral antithrombotic treatment in pa- tients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2014; 167: 329-34.
  9. Steinberg B, Blanco RG, Ollis D, Kim S, Holmes DN, Kowey PR, et al. Outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrilla- tion II: Rationale and design of the ORBIT-AF II registry. Am Heart J 2014; 168: 160-7.
  10. Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, Fitzmaurice DA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, et al. International longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD). Am Heart J 2012; 163: 13-9.
  11. Kaya H, Ertaş F, Köroğlu B, Vatan B, Çağlıyan ÇE, Gedik S, et al. Predictors of anticoagulant treatment in patients with nonva