Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Gender disparities in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction: Results from APOLLON study

Pages
242–252
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study offers a broad perspective for increased awareness about this patient profile in Turkey. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 21: 242-52)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to examine gender-based differences in epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of consecutivepatients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Methods: The APOLLON trial (A comPrehensive, ObservationaL registry of heart faiLure with mid-range and preserved ejection fractiON) is amulticenter, cross-sectional, and observational study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consecutive patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF who were admitted to the cardiology clinicswere included (NCT03026114).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study offers a broad perspective for increased awareness about this patient profile in Turkey. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 21: 242-52)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to examine gender-based differences in epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of consecutivepatients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Methods: The APOLLON trial (A comPrehensive, ObservationaL registry of heart faiLure with mid-range and preserved ejection fractiON) is amulticenter, cross-sectional, and observational study. Consecutive patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF who were admitted to the cardiology clinicswere included (NCT03026114). Herein, we performed a post-hoc analysis of data from the APOLLON trial.Results: The study population included 1065 (mean age of 67.1±10.6 years, 54% women) patients from 11 sites in Turkey. Compared with men,women were older (68 years vs. 67 years, p<0.001), had higher body mass index (29 kg/m2 vs. 27 kg/m2, p<0.001), and had higher heart rate (80 bpmvs. 77.5 bpm, p<0.001). Women were more likely to have HFpEF (82% vs. 70.9%, p<0.001), and they differ from men having a higher prevalence ofhypertension (78.7% vs. 73.2%, p=0.035) and atrial fibrillation (40.7% vs. 29.9%, p<0.001) but lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (29.5%vs. 54.9%, p<0.001). Women had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (691 pg/mL vs. 541 pg/mL, p=0.004), lower hemoglobin (12.7 g/dLvs. 13.8 g/dL, p<0.001), and serum ferritin (51 ng/mL vs. 64 ng/mL, p=0.001) levels, and they had worse diastolic function (E/e'=10 vs. 9, p<0.001).The main cause of heart failure (HF) in women was atrial fibrillation, while it was ischemic heart disease in men.Conclusion: Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and etiological factors are significantly different in female and male patients with HFmrEFand HFpEF. This study offers a broad perspective for increased awareness about this patient profile in Turkey. (Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 21: 242-52)

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZLEK, B., ÖZLEK, E., KAHRAMAN, S., TEKİNALP, M., AĞUŞ, H. Z., ÇELİK, O., ÇİL, C., DOĞAN, V., BAŞARAN, Ö., KAYA, B. C., RENCÜZOĞULLARI, İ., ÖSKEN, A., BEKAR, L., ÇAKIR, M. O., ÇELİK, Y., MERT, K. U., SANCAR, K. M., SEVİNÇ, S., MERT, G. Ö., BİTEK, M. (2019). Gender disparities in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction: Results from APOLLON study. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 242–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/365757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163-96
  2. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Devel oped with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2129-200
  3. Abraham WT, Fonarow GC, Albert NM, Stough WG, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg BH, et al.; OPTIMIZE-HF Investigators and Coordinators. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure: insights from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZEHF). J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 347-56
  4. Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, et al.; ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J 2005; 149: 209-16
  5. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 251-9
  6. Tribouilloy C, Rusinaru D, Mahjoub H, Soulière V, Lévy F, Peltier M, al. Prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a 5 year prospective population-based study. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 339-47
  7. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, Austin PC, Fang J, Haouzi A, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 260-9
  8. Klempfner R, Koifman E, Goldenberg I, Hamdan A, Tofler GH, Kopel E. The Israel Nationwide Heart Failure Survey: Sex differences in early and late mortality for hospitalized heart failure patients. J Card Fail 2014; 20: 193-8
  9. Brandsaeter B, Atar D, Agewall S; Norwegian Heart failure Registry. Gender differences among Norwegian patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2011; 146: 354-8
  10. Deswal A, Bozkurt B. Comparison