Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the effects of coronary artery anastomosis training between senior and junior surgeons

Pages
153–159
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, we assessed individual surgical performance of surgeons by using performance rating scores, including different aspects of surgical skills rated on a five-point scale.Results: The post-training scores (overall, junior, senior) were significantly higher than the pre-training scores (overall, junior, and senior).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Many countries are facing a shortage of cardiac surgeons, who are crucial in meeting the demands of growing number of patients in need of coronary artery bypass grafting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiac surgeons are suitable for training in coronary artery anastomosis at an earlier stage in their career.Methods: We divided 12 cardiac surgeons with no prior experience in coronary artery anastomosis into senior and junior groups for training and assessment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, we assessed individual surgical performance of surgeons by using performance rating scores, including different aspects of surgical skills rated on a five-point scale.Results: The post-training scores (overall, junior, senior) were significantly higher than the pre-training scores (overall, junior, and senior).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Many countries are facing a shortage of cardiac surgeons, who are crucial in meeting the demands of growing number of patients in need of coronary artery bypass grafting. This situation poses a serious challenge, especially in China. The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiac surgeons are suitable for training in coronary artery anastomosis at an earlier stage in their career.Methods: We divided 12 cardiac surgeons with no prior experience in coronary artery anastomosis into senior and junior groups for training and assessment. All trainees received training in coronary artery anastomosis for a defined period. We performed in vivo and in vitro examina-tions before and after training, respectively. Additionally, we assessed individual surgical performance of surgeons by using performance rating scores, including different aspects of surgical skills rated on a five-point scale.Results: The post-training scores (overall, junior, senior) were significantly higher than the pre-training scores (overall, junior, and senior). We observed no differences in pre-training and post-training scores between the junior and senior groups.Conclusion: Senior surgeons did not had any significant advantages over junior surgeons with respect to coronary artery anastomosis in the absence of training. Junior surgeons achieved the same results as the senior surgeons after training. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 153-9)

🔖

Cite This Article

ZHANG, D., Lİ, B., LUO, X., Qİ, L., LUO, F., Lİ, B., TANG, Y. (2020). Comparison of the effects of coronary artery anastomosis training between senior and junior surgeons. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 153–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/365698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zhou M, Wang H, Zhu J, Chen W, Wang L, Liu S, et al. Cause-specif-ic mortality for 240 causes in China during 1990-2013: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2016; 387: 251-72
  2. Moran A, Gu D, Zhao D, Coxson P, Wang YC, Chen CS, et al. Future cardiovascular disease in china: markov model and risk factor sce-nario projections from the coronary heart disease policy model-china. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010; 3: 243-52
  3. Alexander JH, Smith PK. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1954-64
  4. Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE. Coro-nary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review. JAMA 2013; 310: 2086-95
  5. Tinica G, Chistol RO, Enache M, Leon Constantin MM, Ciocoiu M, Furnica C. Long-term graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects of morphological and pathophysiological factors. Anatol J Cardiol 2018; 20: 275-82
  6. Williams TE Jr, Sun B, Ross P Jr, Thomas AM. A formidable task: Population analysis predicts a deficit of 2000 cardiothoracic sur-geons by 2030. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 835-40; discus-sion 840-1
  7. Li B, Cui Y, Zhang D, Luo X, Luo F, Li B, et al. The characteristics of a porcine mitral regurgitation model. Exp Anim 2018; 67: 463-77
  8. Fann JI, Feins RH, Hicks GL Jr, Nesbitt JC, Hammon JW, Crawford FA Jr; Senior Tour in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Evaluation of simula-tion training in cardiothoracic surgery: the Senior Tour perspective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 264-72
  9. Bilge M, Ali S, Alsancak Y, Saatçi Yaşar A. Hybrid approach of per-cutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip followed by off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Anatol J Cardiol 2015; 15: 503-5
  10. Blackstone EH, Sabik JF 3rd. Changing the Discussion about On-Pump versus Off-Pump CABG. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 692-3
  11. Liu X, Yang Y, Meng Q, Sun J, Luo F, Cui Y, et al. A Secure and High-Fidelity Live Animal Model for Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery Training. J Surg Educ 2016; 73: 583-8
  12. Hu S, Zheng Z, Yuan X, Wang Y, Normand SL, Ross JS, et al. Coro-nary artery bypass graft: contemporary heart surgery center per-formance in China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012; 5: 214-21
  13. Huo Y. Current status and development of percutaneous coronary intervention in China. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2010; 11: 631-3
  14. Wan YC, Wan YI. Delivering surgical training in t