Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 12

A review of the fixed dose use of new oral anticoagulants in obese patients: Is it really enough?

Pages
1020–1029
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To address this issue, we analyzed several patients with a body weight of >100 kg or BMI of >30 kg/m participating in NOAC studies and evaluated whether these numbers were sufficient to enable an accurate recommendation of fixed dose use in obese patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Obesity is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and it is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are more frequently used for anticoagulation, are recommended to be used at a fixed dose based on data derived from phase 2 and 3 studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To address this issue, we analyzed several patients with a body weight of >100 kg or BMI of >30 kg/m participating in NOAC studies and evaluated whether these numbers were sufficient to enable an accurate recommendation of fixed dose use in obese patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Obesity is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and it is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. Altered pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drugs in obese patients require dose adjustment according to body weight. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are more frequently used for anticoagulation, are recommended to be used at a fixed dose based on data derived from phase 2 and 3 studies. However, the representation of obese patients [>100 kg or a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m] in subgroups with a small sample size and reports of various emboli cases under drug treatment have raised suspicions about the adequacy of fixed dose use. To address this issue, we analyzed several patients with a body weight of >100 kg or BMI of >30 kg/m participating in NOAC studies and evaluated whether these numbers were sufficient to enable an accurate recommendation of fixed dose use in obese patients

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, E., BABÜR, G. G., DEMİR, G. G., HATİPOĞLU, S. (2015). A review of the fixed dose use of new oral anticoagulants in obese patients: Is it really enough?. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 12, 1020–1029. https://ajindex.com/articles/365628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibril- lation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2719-27. [CrossRef] Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Childhood and Adult Obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311: 806-14. [CrossRef] Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1431-7. [CrossRef] Haslam D, James P. Obesity. Lancet 2005; 366: 1197-209. [CrossRef] Hanley MJ, Abernethy DR, Greenblatt DJ. Effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010; 49: 71-87. [CrossRef] Chagnac A, Weinstein T, Korzets A, Ramadan E, Hirsch J, Gafter U. Glomerular hemodynamics in severe obesity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2000; 278: 817-22.
  2. Green B, Duffull SB. What is the best size descriptor to use for phar- macokinetic studies in the obese? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 58: 119- 33. [CrossRef] Weitz JI. Expanding use of new oral anticoagulants. F1000Prime Rep 2014; 1: 6: 93. Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N, Kurth AA, van Dijk CN, Frostick SP, et al. RE-NOVATE Study Group. Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replace- ment: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007; 15: 370: 949-56. [CrossRef] Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Huo MH, Kurth AA, Hantel S, Hermansson K, et al. Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II). Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 721-9. [CrossRef] Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N, Kurth AA, van Dijk CN, Frostick SP, et al. Dabigatran etexilate vs. enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL Randomized Trial. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 2178-85. [CrossRef] Ginsberg JS, Davidson BL, Comp PC, Francis CW, Friedman RJ, Huo MH, et al. RE-MOBILIZE Writing Committee. Oral thrombin inhibitör dabigatran etexilate vs. North American enoxaparin regimen for pre- vention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 1-9. [CrossRef] Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, Mismetti P, Schellong S, Eriksson H, et al. Dabigatran ver