Journals / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers

Pages
232–240
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found age, higher levels of triglyceride and family history of coronary artery disease to be risk factors for predicting CN.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: There is still a group of patient that have unpredictable risk for the development of contrast nephropathy (CN).
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is also an effort to find more effficient strategies to prevent CN.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found age, higher levels of triglyceride and family history of coronary artery disease to be risk factors for predicting CN.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: There is still a group of patient that have unpredictable risk for the development of contrast nephropathy (CN). There is also an effort to find more effficient strategies to prevent CN. Carvedilol, metoprolol and nebivolol seem to have theoretical potentials for the prevention of CN. In this study, we aimed to investigate their effects on the prevention of CN. We also aimed to define the risk factors associated with the development of CN in our study group. Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, the patients were divided into four groups according to whether they were taking 25 mg/day carvedilol (n:56), 5 mg/day nebivolol (n:60), 50 mg/day metoprolol (n:68) or none (n:63). We made analysis to determine the agents' efficiency on the prevention of CN. We also performed multiple logistic regression analysis including all groups to define the risk factors associated with CN. Results: The incidents of CN were the lowest in the carvedilol group (4%) while the worst performance occurred in those taking metoprolol (10%). The difference between the groups in terms of the development of CN did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age (p=0.003), higher triglyceride levels (p=0.011) and family history of coronary artery disease (p=0.038) to be the predictors of CN. Conclusion: In this study, we didn t find any relation between the development of CN and carvedilol, metoprolol or nebivolol usage. We found age, higher levels of triglyceride and family history of coronary artery disease to be risk factors for predicting CN.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜLLÜ, Ç., ERYILMAZ, U., GÜNGÖR, H., HUYUT, M. A., ZENCİR, C., HEKİM, T. (2015). A clinical study about contrast nephropathy: Risk factors and the role of beta blockers. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 232–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/365593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Goldfarb S, Mccullough P, Mcdermott J, Gay SB. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: specialty-specific protocols for interventional radiology, diagnostic computed tomography radiology, and interventional cardiology. Mayo Clin Proc 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006
  3. S11-5. [CrossRef] 3. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, Lameire N, Stacul F, et al. CIN Consensus Working Panel. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Gangas G, Lansky AJ, Kent KM, et al. The prognostic implications of further renal function deteriora- tion within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast induced nephropathy after coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Aydoğdu S. Contrast-induced nephropathy. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2013
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Wong PC, Li Z, Guo J, Zhang A. Pathophysiology of contrast- induced nephropathy. Int J Cardiol 2012
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Gami AS, Garovic VD. Contrast nephropathy after coronary angiog- raphy. Mayo Clin Proc 2004
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Oelze M, Daiber A, Brandes RP, Hortmann M, Wenzel P, Hink U, et al. Nebivolol inhibits superoxide formation by NADPH oxidase and endothelial dysfunction in angiotensin II-treated rats. Hypertension 2006
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Jenkins RR, Del Signore CM, Sauer P, Skelly C. The effect of beta blocking drugs on lipid peroxidation in rat heart in vitro. Lipids 1992
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Liu XK, Engelman RM, Agrawal HR, Das DK. Preservation of mem- brane phospholipids by propranolol, pindolol, and metoprolol: a novel mechanism of action of beta-blockers. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1991
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Avcı E, Yeşil M, Bayata S, Postacı N, Arıkan E, Cirit M. The role of nebivolol in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction. Anatol J Cardiol 2011
  13. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Rodrigues MA, Rodrigues JL, Mar